The population is growing about as fast as in Berg en Dal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Berg en Dal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Groesbeek is €373,000, 6% lower than in Berg en Dal (€395,000). Between 2016 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 83%, the same as in Berg en Dal. 56% of the homes are owner-occupied, 5 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€373,000
▼6% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2016
+83%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+83%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
56%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
75%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (11%)
Built 1965–1974
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Built before 1945
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
Average WOZ value
€373,000
▼6% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2016
+83%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+83%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
56%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
75%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (11%)
Built 1965–1974
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Built before 1945
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 83% between 2016 and 2025, to €373,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€373,000▼ 6% below Berg en Dal
+83% since 2016
Berg en Dal +83%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€300 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€300/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
135 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €373,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€116NL median
Water board levy€42–
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€24€33
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€184
Maintenance reserve€172–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 70th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 135 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €373,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Groesbeek has the 5th-lowest WOZ value of the 13 wijken in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €373,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Groesbeek
373,000
6,003
–
Beek
465,000
1,778
–
Berg en Dal
460,000
1,318
–
Breedeweg
380,000
1,125
–
De Horst
437,000
539
–
Erlecom
430,000
70
–
Heilig Landstichting
886,000
339
–
Kekerdom
361,000
246
–
Leuth
334,000
797
–
Millingen aan de Rijn
315,000
2,678
–
Ooij
383,000
1,160
–
Persingen
567,000
39
–
Ubbergen
328,000
253
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 56% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied56%
Social housing33%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
75% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes75%
Multi-family homes25%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 19457.5%
1945-196417.1%
1965-19748.6%
1975-199128.1%
1992-200514.8%
2006-201518.3%
2016 and later5.6%
Explanation
Based on 6,052 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Berg en Dal average.
In 2025, 41 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Groesbeek, 37% higher than in Berg en Dal (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 1%, against a fall of 5% in Berg en Dal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
41
▲37% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
+1%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.8
▼14% lower than Berg en Dal (2.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
41
▲37% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
+1%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.8
▼14% lower than Berg en Dal (2.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Groesbeek registered 41 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Groesbeek41
The municipality of Berg en Dal30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Groesbeek is 'Theft and burglary': 15.4 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 11.3 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
GroesbeekBerg en Dal
Theft and burglary15.4
Berg en Dal 11.3▲ +36% vs Berg en Dal
Vandalism and public order8.8
Berg en Dal 5.2▲ +69% vs Berg en Dal
Violence and threats7.1
Berg en Dal 4.0▲ +77% vs Berg en Dal
Traffic5.2
Berg en Dal 4.2▲ +24% vs Berg en Dal
Fraud and scams3.2
Berg en Dal 4.5▼ −29% vs Berg en Dal
Other and withheld1.2
Berg en Dal 0.8▲ +50% vs Berg en Dal
Environmental0.0
Berg en Dal 0.1≈ Berg en Dal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Groesbeek registered 42 traffic accidents, of which 14 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Berg en Dal average; green space is above the Berg en Dal average.
An estimated 70% of adults in Groesbeek rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal. More adults report anxiety or depression (46% against 44%), more smoke (16% against 15%) and more feel lonely (43% against 42%), but fewer drink excessively (5% against 6%). Forest and natural land is the largest land use in Groesbeek, covering 40% of the area, against 28% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 48% of the area, 16 percentage points above the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
48%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (15%)
Overweight
54%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
36%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
40%
▲12 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
48%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
43%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Smokes
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (15%)
Overweight
54%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (54%)
Agriculture, share of the area
36%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
40%
▲12 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (8%)
Health
An estimated 70% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berg en Dal
Good self-rated health
70.3%
71.9%
Smokes
16.1%
15.2%
Excessive drinking
5.4%
5.7%
Overweight
54.2%
53.9%
Lonely
43.2%
41.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.7%
44.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.1%
46.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
48% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic1.5%
Built-up13.9%
Other built-up0.5%
Recreation8.3%
Agriculture36.2%
Forest and nature39.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Berg en Dal average.
Groesbeek has 13,260 inhabitants (2026), or 560 per km² (35% higher than in Berg en Dal). Between 2016 and 2026 the population rose 4%, against a rise of 3% in Berg en Dal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2016
+4%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Never married
45%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
82%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2016
+4%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+3%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+6%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Never married
45%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
82%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 4% between 2016 and 2026, to 13,260.
Residents, 2026
13,260
+4% since 2016
Berg en Dal +3%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 560 residents per km², this wijk is 35% more densely populated than the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²560
Dwellings per km²253.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; 15.4 died per 1,000.
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,620
15 to 251,345
25 to 452,955
45 to 653,575
65 to 802,760
80 and over1,000
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married5,945
Married5,400
Divorced965
Widowed945
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
82% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands10,865
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)1,310
Outside Europe1,085
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
40% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo13,070
Havo, vwo, mbo2-43,940
Higher professional, university2,860
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Groesbeek has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Berg en Dal (1.2). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
+7 pp
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Private rent
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
75%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Social housing
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
+7 pp
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Retail, share of addresses
2%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Private rent
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
75%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Social housing
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 320 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij30
Nijverheid en energie310
Handel en horeca250
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie55
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed90
Zakelijke dienstverlening320
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg260
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten175
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol79.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 21% between 2016 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▼ 1 percentage point below Berg en Dal (22%)
+7 pp since 2016
Berg en Dal +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 7,125 passenger cars and 525 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars7,125
Motorcycles525
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (4%).
Residential87.8%
Retail1.5%
Office0.9%
Assembly0.9%
Healthcare2.5%
Industrial3.4%
Lodging3.9%
Education0.3%
Sports0.2%
Other2%
Explanation
Based on 6,895 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
25% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings25%
NL 37%▼ −32% vs NL
Private rent11%
NL 14%▼ −21% vs NL
Single-family dwellings75%
NL 63%▲ +19% vs NL
Social housing33%
NL 28%▲ +18% vs NL
Average WOZ value€373,000
NL €398,000▼ −6% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025