The population is growing faster than in Berg en Dal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Berg en Dal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid is €353,000, 11% lower than in Berg en Dal (€395,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 45%, against a rise of 43% in Berg en Dal. 52% of the homes are owner-occupied, 9 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€353,000
▼11% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
52%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼31 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
Average WOZ value
€353,000
▼11% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
52%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼31 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Built 2016 and later
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 45% between 2021 and 2025, to €353,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€353,000▼ 11% below Berg en Dal
+45% since 2021
Berg en Dal +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€271 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€271/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
115 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €353,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€115NL median
Water board levy€42–
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Property tax (OZB)€23€31
Costs to set aside€156
Maintenance reserve€146–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 72nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 115 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €353,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid has the 3rd-lowest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Groesbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €353,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid
353,000
828
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
378,000
1,190
–
Groesbeek Nijerf
404,000
866
–
Groesbeek De Drul-Oost
323,000
877
–
Groesbeek De Drul-West
386,000
539
–
Groesbeek Stekkenberg
361,000
1,169
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
270,000
136
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West
448,000
20
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
497,000
344
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 52% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied52%
Social housing30%
Private rent18%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
52% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes48%
Multi-family homes52%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
24% of dwellings were built between 2006 and 2015, against 11% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 194516.2%
1945-196416.6%
1965-19744%
1975-199120.8%
1992-20054.2%
2006-201524.1%
2016 and later14.2%
Explanation
Based on 819 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Berg en Dal average.
In 2025, 71 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid, 2.4 times as high as in Berg en Dal (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 51%, against a fall of 5% in Berg en Dal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
71
▲2.4 times as high as Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
+51%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
71
▲2.4 times as high as Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
+51%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid registered 71 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid71
The municipality of Berg en Dal30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid is 'Theft and burglary': 29.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 11.3 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Groesbeek Centrum-ZuidBerg en Dal
Theft and burglary29.1
Berg en Dal 11.3▲ +158% vs Berg en Dal
Traffic14.9
Berg en Dal 4.2▲ +255% vs Berg en Dal
Vandalism and public order14.2
Berg en Dal 5.2▲ +173% vs Berg en Dal
Fraud and scams7.1
Berg en Dal 4.5▲ +58% vs Berg en Dal
Violence and threats3.2
Berg en Dal 4.0▼ −20% vs Berg en Dal
Other and withheld1.9
Berg en Dal 0.8▲ +137% vs Berg en Dal
Environmental0.0
Berg en Dal 0.1≈ Berg en Dal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Berg en Dal average; green space is below the Berg en Dal average.
An estimated 70% of adults in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal. More adults feel lonely (44% against 42%) and more report anxiety or depression (46% against 44%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 46%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid, covering 89% of the area, against 9% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 30 percentage points below the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼30 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (46%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Excessive drinking
6%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
89%
▲80 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
4%
▼44 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼30 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (46%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Excessive drinking
6%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
89%
▲80 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
4%
▼44 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Health
An estimated 70% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berg en Dal
Good self-rated health
70%
71.9%
Smokes
15.1%
15.2%
Excessive drinking
6.5%
5.7%
Overweight
53.6%
53.9%
Lonely
43.6%
41.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.9%
44.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.2%
46.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic1.9%
Built-up88.9%
Other built-up3.7%
Recreation1.9%
Agriculture3.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
400 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
4.1
GP practices
–
2.6
Daycares
–
2.7
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Berg en Dal average.
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid has 1,495 inhabitants (2026), or 2,756 per km² (6.6 times as high as in Berg en Dal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 6%, against a rise of 2% in Berg en Dal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+6%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Never married
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+6%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+12%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Never married
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
40%
▼1 percentage point lower than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 6% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,495.
Residents, 2026
1,495
+6% since 2021
Berg en Dal +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 2,756 residents per km², this buurt is 6.6 times as densely populated as the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²2,756
Dwellings per km²1,533.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 16.2 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15115
15 to 25120
25 to 45315
45 to 65400
65 to 80375
80 and over165
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are never married.
Never married625
Married610
Divorced105
Widowed150
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,250
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)145
Outside Europe95
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
40% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1300
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4460
Higher professional, university380
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Berg en Dal (1.2). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
27%
▲13 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Business services, share of businesses
16%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (24%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
15%
▼7 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
52%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
18%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
27%
▲13 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Business services, share of businesses
16%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (24%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
15%
▼7 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+7 pp
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
4%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
52%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
48%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
18%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 75 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie50
Handel en horeca75
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening45
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg40
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
23% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol77.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)22.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 15% to 23% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
23%▲ 1 percentage point above Berg en Dal (22%)
+8 pp since 2021
Berg en Dal +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 945 passenger cars and 70 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars945
Motorcycles70
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
82% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (7%).
Residential82.5%
Retail3.7%
Office2.8%
Assembly2%
Healthcare2.3%
Industrial6.8%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.7%
Sports0.3%
Other1.5%
Explanation
Based on 993 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2,756 residents per km²: 5.1 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²2,756
NL 539▲ +411% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings52%
NL 37%▲ +41% vs NL
Single-family dwellings48%
NL 63%▼ −24% vs NL
Private rent18%
NL 14%▲ +29% vs NL
Average WOZ value€353,000
NL €398,000▼ −11% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026