We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Berg en Dal
Living in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
The population is growing faster than in Berg en Dal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Berg en Dal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West is €270,000, 32% lower than in Berg en Dal (€395,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 48%, against a rise of 43% in Berg en Dal. 3% of the homes are owner-occupied, 58 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€270,000
▼32% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
3%
▼58 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
59%
▲49 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
8%
▼71 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
1%
▼21 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (21%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Average WOZ value
€270,000
▼32% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
3%
▼58 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
38%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
59%
▲49 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
8%
▼71 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
1%
▼21 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (21%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 48% between 2021 and 2025, to €270,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€270,000▼ 32% below Berg en Dal
+48% since 2021
Berg en Dal +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€244 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€244/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
101 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €270,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€107NL median
Water board levy€39–
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Property tax (OZB)€18€24
Costs to set aside€137
Maintenance reserve€128–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 89th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 101 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €270,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West has the lowest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Groesbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €270,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
270,000
136
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid
353,000
828
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
378,000
1,190
–
Groesbeek Nijerf
404,000
866
–
Groesbeek De Drul-Oost
323,000
877
–
Groesbeek De Drul-West
386,000
539
–
Groesbeek Stekkenberg
361,000
1,169
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West
448,000
20
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
497,000
344
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is private rent, at 59% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied3%
Social housing38%
Private rent59%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes8%
Multi-family homes92%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
90% of dwellings were built between 2006 and 2015, against 11% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 19452.9%
1945-19641.4%
1965-19745.1%
1975-19910.7%
2006-201589.9%
Explanation
Based on 138 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Berg en Dal average.
In 2025, 164 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West, 5.5 times as high as in Berg en Dal (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 33%, against a fall of 5% in Berg en Dal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
164
▲5.5 times as high as Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-33%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
164
▲5.5 times as high as Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-33%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West registered 164 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West164
The municipality of Berg en Dal30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West is 'Violence and threats': 85.9 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.0 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-WestBerg en Dal
Violence and threats85.9
Berg en Dal 4.0▲ +2048% vs Berg en Dal
Vandalism and public order40.6
Berg en Dal 5.2▲ +681% vs Berg en Dal
Theft and burglary23.4
Berg en Dal 11.3▲ +107% vs Berg en Dal
Traffic7.8
Berg en Dal 4.2▲ +86% vs Berg en Dal
Other and withheld4.7
Berg en Dal 0.8▲ +488% vs Berg en Dal
Fraud and scams1.6
Berg en Dal 4.5▼ −64% vs Berg en Dal
Environmental0.0
Berg en Dal 0.1≈ Berg en Dal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West registered 6 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Berg en Dal average; green space is above the Berg en Dal average.
An estimated 62% of adults in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West rate their own health as good, 10 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal. More adults smoke (49% against 15%), more feel lonely (62% against 42%) and more report anxiety or depression (63% against 44%), but fewer are overweight (40% against 54%). Forest and natural land is the largest land use in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West, covering 86% of the area, against 28% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 89% of the area, 57 percentage points above the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
62%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
89%
▲57 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Smokes
49%
▲34 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (15%)
Lonely
62%
▲20 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
63%
▲19 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Overweight
40%
▼14 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
86%
▲58 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
1%
▼47 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
62%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
89%
▲57 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Smokes
49%
▲34 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (15%)
Lonely
62%
▲20 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
63%
▲19 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Overweight
40%
▼14 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
86%
▲58 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
1%
▼47 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Water, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (8%)
Health
An estimated 62% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berg en Dal
Good self-rated health
62%
71.9%
Smokes
49.3%
15.2%
Excessive drinking
7.1%
5.7%
Overweight
40.4%
53.9%
Lonely
62.1%
41.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
62.7%
44.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
52.8%
46.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
89% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic0.5%
Built-up9.3%
Recreation3%
Agriculture0.8%
Forest and nature86.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 2500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,500 m
–
GP practice
3,100 m
–
Primary school
2,500 m
–
Daycare
2,500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Berg en Dal average.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West has 605 inhabitants (2026), or 165 per km² (60% lower than in Berg en Dal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 75%, against a rise of 2% in Berg en Dal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+75%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (21%)
Never married
74%
▲29 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
45%
▼37 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+75%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (21%)
Never married
74%
▲29 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
45%
▼37 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 75% between 2021 and 2026, to 605.
Residents, 2026
605
+75% since 2021
Berg en Dal +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 165 residents per km², this buurt is 60% less densely populated than the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²165
Dwellings per km²37.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 7.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 85.9 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 1550
15 to 25125
25 to 45170
45 to 65100
65 to 8075
80 and over85
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
74% of residents are never married.
Never married445
Married80
Divorced25
Widowed50
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
46% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands275
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)270
Outside Europe60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West has an average of 0.3 cars per household, 75% lower than in Berg en Dal (1.2). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
60%
▲38 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Business services, share of businesses
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.3
▼75% lower than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−2 pp
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Healthcare, share of addresses
66%
▲64 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Education, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (0%)
Single-family dwellings
8%
▼55 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
59%
▲45 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
165
▼69% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
60%
▲38 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Business services, share of businesses
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.3
▼75% lower than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−2 pp
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Healthcare, share of addresses
66%
▲64 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Education, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (0%)
Single-family dwellings
8%
▼55 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
59%
▲45 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
165
▼69% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 15 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca0
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening0
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol82.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)17.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 18% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%▼ 4 percentage points below Berg en Dal (22%)
-2 pp since 2021
Berg en Dal +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 85 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars85
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (66%).
Residential85.7%
Office1.9%
Assembly1.9%
Healthcare65.8%
Lodging0.6%
Education2.5%
Sports0.6%
Other3.7%
Explanation
Based on 161 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% owner-occupied dwellings, against 57% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Owner-occupied dwellings3%
NL 57%▼ −95% vs NL
Single-family dwellings8%
NL 63%▼ −87% vs NL
Private rent59%
NL 14%▲ +321% vs NL
Residents per km²165
NL 539▼ −69% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings92%
NL 37%▲ +149% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025