We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Berg en Dal
Living in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
The population is growing slower than in Berg en Dal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Berg en Dal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord is €378,000, 4% lower than in Berg en Dal (€395,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 48%, against a rise of 43% in Berg en Dal. 45% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€378,000
▼4% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
45%
▼16 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
44%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
59%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built before 1945
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (6%)
Average WOZ value
€378,000
▼4% lower than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
45%
▼16 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
44%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
59%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
10%
▼12 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built before 1945
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (12%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (6%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 48% between 2021 and 2025, to €378,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€378,000▼ 4% below Berg en Dal
+48% since 2021
Berg en Dal +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€288 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€288/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
126 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €378,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€117NL median
Water board levy€42–
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€25€33
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€171
Maintenance reserve€160–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 70th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 126 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €378,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord has the 5th-highest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Groesbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €378,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
378,000
1,190
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid
353,000
828
–
Groesbeek Nijerf
404,000
866
–
Groesbeek De Drul-Oost
323,000
877
–
Groesbeek De Drul-West
386,000
539
–
Groesbeek Stekkenberg
361,000
1,169
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
270,000
136
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West
448,000
20
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
497,000
344
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 45% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied45%
Social housing44%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
59% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes59%
Multi-family homes41%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
25% of dwellings were built between 2006 and 2015, against 11% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 19456.3%
1945-196421%
1965-197420.2%
1975-199110.4%
1992-200517.1%
2006-201525%
2016 and later0.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,178 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Berg en Dal average.
In 2025, 45 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord, 50% higher than in Berg en Dal (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents stayed about level, against a fall of 5% in Berg en Dal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
45
▲50% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-0%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.1
▼48% lower than Berg en Dal (2.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
45
▲50% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-0%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.1
▼48% lower than Berg en Dal (2.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Groesbeek Centrum-Noord registered 45 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord45
The municipality of Berg en Dal30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord is 'Vandalism and public order': 17.7 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.2 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Groesbeek Centrum-NoordBerg en Dal
Vandalism and public order17.7
Berg en Dal 5.2▲ +240% vs Berg en Dal
Theft and burglary16.9
Berg en Dal 11.3▲ +50% vs Berg en Dal
Violence and threats3.5
Berg en Dal 4.0▼ −12% vs Berg en Dal
Traffic3.5
Berg en Dal 4.2▼ −17% vs Berg en Dal
Fraud and scams2.6
Berg en Dal 4.5▼ −42% vs Berg en Dal
Other and withheld0.9
Berg en Dal 0.8≈ Berg en Dal
Environmental0.0
Berg en Dal 0.1≈ Berg en Dal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Berg en Dal average; green space is below the Berg en Dal average.
An estimated 67% of adults in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal. More adults feel lonely (45% against 42%) and more report anxiety or depression (46% against 44%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 46%) and fewer drink excessively (5% against 6%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Groesbeek Centrum-Noord, covering 84% of the area, against 9% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 13% of the area, 19 percentage points below the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
67%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
13%
▼19 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Overweight
55%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (54%)
Built-up, share of the area
84%
▲75 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
2%
▼46 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
67%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
13%
▼19 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (44%)
Overweight
55%
▲1 percentage point higher than Berg en Dal (54%)
Built-up, share of the area
84%
▲75 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (9%)
Agriculture, share of the area
2%
▼46 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Health
An estimated 67% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berg en Dal
Good self-rated health
67.2%
71.9%
Smokes
14.9%
15.2%
Excessive drinking
5.1%
5.7%
Overweight
54.6%
53.9%
Lonely
45.2%
41.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.9%
44.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
43.5%
46.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
13% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic1.6%
Built-up84.1%
Recreation12.7%
Agriculture1.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
500 m
–
GP practice
500 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
3
GP practices
–
2.4
Daycares
–
2.5
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Berg en Dal average.
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord has 2,315 inhabitants (2026), or 3,645 per km² (8.8 times as high as in Berg en Dal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 2% in Berg en Dal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Married
42%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (42%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
36%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Married
42%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (42%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
36%
▲10 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 2,315.
Residents, 2026
2,315
+0% since 2021
Berg en Dal +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,645 residents per km², this buurt is 8.8 times as densely populated as the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²3,645
Dwellings per km²1,859.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 26.0 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
26% of residents are between 65 and 80.
0 to 15195
15 to 25195
25 to 45435
45 to 65555
65 to 80610
80 and over325
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are married.
Never married900
Married970
Divorced170
Widowed280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
80% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,850
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)235
Outside Europe230
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
36% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1580
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4540
Higher professional, university470
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 17% lower than in Berg en Dal (1.2). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
26%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (2%)
Social housing
44%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
45%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (14%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
26%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼17% lower than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
3%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (2%)
Social housing
44%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
45%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 60 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca50
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening50
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg60
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol77.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)22.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 22% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%– about the same as Berg en Dal (22%)
+8 pp since 2021
Berg en Dal +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,145 passenger cars and 65 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,145
Motorcycles65
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (3%).
Residential92%
Retail3%
Office0.5%
Assembly1%
Healthcare1.7%
Industrial0.2%
Lodging0.4%
Education0.2%
Sports0.2%
Other2.3%
Explanation
Based on 1,280 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,645 residents per km²: 6.8 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,645
NL 539▲ +576% vs NL
Social housing44%
NL 28%▲ +57% vs NL
Private rent11%
NL 14%▼ −21% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings45%
NL 57%▼ −21% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings41%
NL 37%▲ +11% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026