We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Berg en Dal
Living in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
The population is growing faster than in Berg en Dal. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Berg en Dal, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord is €497,000, 26% higher than in Berg en Dal (€395,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 44%, against a rise of 43% in Berg en Dal. 77% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€497,000
▲26% higher than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
13%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
10%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
2%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built 2016 and later
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
Average WOZ value
€497,000
▲26% higher than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+44%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
13%
▼15 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
10%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1975–1991
2%
▼20 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Built 2016 and later
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 44% between 2021 and 2025, to €497,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€497,000▲ 26% above Berg en Dal
+44% since 2021
Berg en Dal +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€355 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€355/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
166 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €497,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€128NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€32€44
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€227
Maintenance reserve€212–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 59th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 166 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €497,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord has the highest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Groesbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €497,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
497,000
344
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid
353,000
828
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
378,000
1,190
–
Groesbeek Nijerf
404,000
866
–
Groesbeek De Drul-Oost
323,000
877
–
Groesbeek De Drul-West
386,000
539
–
Groesbeek Stekkenberg
361,000
1,169
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
270,000
136
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West
448,000
20
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 77% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied77%
Social housing13%
Private rent10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
86% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes86%
Multi-family homes14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
31% of dwellings were built between 2006 and 2015, against 11% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 194512.4%
1945-196423.8%
1965-19744.4%
1975-19911.6%
1992-20053.6%
2006-201531.1%
2016 and later23.1%
Explanation
Based on 386 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Berg en Dal average.
In 2025, 46 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord, 53% higher than in Berg en Dal (30). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 21%, against a fall of 5% in Berg en Dal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▲53% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-21%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
8.7
▲4.1 times as high as Berg en Dal (2.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▲53% higher than Berg en Dal (30)
Change since 2021
-21%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
8.7
▲4.1 times as high as Berg en Dal (2.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord registered 46 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 30 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord46
The municipality of Berg en Dal30
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord is 'Theft and burglary': 25.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 11.3 in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-NoordBerg en Dal
Theft and burglary25.1
Berg en Dal 11.3▲ +122% vs Berg en Dal
Traffic9.0
Berg en Dal 4.2▲ +114% vs Berg en Dal
Violence and threats6.0
Berg en Dal 4.0▲ +50% vs Berg en Dal
Vandalism and public order4.0
Berg en Dal 5.2▼ −23% vs Berg en Dal
Fraud and scams2.0
Berg en Dal 4.5▼ −56% vs Berg en Dal
Environmental0.0
Berg en Dal 0.1≈ Berg en Dal
Other and withheld0.0
Berg en Dal 0.8≈ Berg en Dal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord registered 15 traffic accidents, of which 4 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Berg en Dal average; green space is below the Berg en Dal average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points more than in Berg en Dal. Fewer adults feel lonely (36% against 42%), fewer are overweight (49% against 54%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 44%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (52% against 46%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord, covering 66% of the area, against 48% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 30% of the area, 2 percentage points below the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
30%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (42%)
Meets physical activity guideline
52%
▲6 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (46%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (54%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
66%
▲18 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
15%
▼13 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Recreation, share of the area
16%
▲12 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (72%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
30%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (32%)
More figures
Lonely
36%
▼6 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (42%)
Meets physical activity guideline
52%
▲6 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (46%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (54%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
66%
▲18 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
15%
▼13 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Recreation, share of the area
16%
▲12 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (4%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 72% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Berg en Dal
Good self-rated health
78.9%
71.9%
Smokes
13.7%
15.2%
Excessive drinking
5.1%
5.7%
Overweight
48.7%
53.9%
Lonely
36.2%
41.8%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
44.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
51.8%
46.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
30% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic1.6%
Built-up1.2%
Other built-up0.6%
Recreation15.7%
Agriculture66.1%
Forest and nature14.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 1100 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,600 m
–
GP practice
1,700 m
–
Primary school
1,300 m
–
Daycare
1,100 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.8
GP practices
–
0.3
Daycares
–
0.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Berg en Dal average.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord has 1,045 inhabitants (2026), or 107 per km² (74% lower than in Berg en Dal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 14%, against a rise of 2% in Berg en Dal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (21%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+14%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (21%)
Never married
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (45%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲7 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 14% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,045.
Residents, 2026
1,045
+14% since 2021
Berg en Dal +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 107 residents per km², this buurt is 74% less densely populated than the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²107
Dwellings per km²35.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.1 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15220
15 to 2590
25 to 45315
45 to 65255
65 to 80140
80 and over25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
54% of residents are never married.
Never married565
Married405
Divorced50
Widowed25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
86% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands900
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)95
Outside Europe50
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
48% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1140
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4340
Higher professional, university230
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord has an average of 1.7 cars per household, 42% higher than in Berg en Dal (1.2). 25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points more than in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
9%
▼13 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.7
▲42% higher than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
26%
▲24 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
67%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Multi-family dwellings
14%
▼23 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
13%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
9%
▼13 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.7
▲42% higher than Berg en Dal (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
26%
▲24 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
67%
▼24 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Multi-family dwellings
14%
▼23 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
13%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 40 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening40
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
25% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol74.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 25% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
25%▲ 3 percentage points above Berg en Dal (22%)
+6 pp since 2021
Berg en Dal +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 675 passenger cars and 70 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars675
Motorcycles70
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
67% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (26%).
Residential67.4%
Retail0.5%
Office0.3%
Assembly1.4%
Healthcare2.4%
Industrial5.6%
Lodging26.2%
Education0.3%
Sports0.9%
Other2.1%
Explanation
Based on 573 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
107 residents per km²: 80% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²107
NL 539▼ −80% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings14%
NL 37%▼ −62% vs NL
Social housing13%
NL 28%▼ −54% vs NL
Private rent10%
NL 14%▼ −29% vs NL
Single-family dwellings86%
NL 63%▲ +37% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026