The average WOZ value in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West is €448,000. Between 2023 and 2024 the average WOZ value rose 10%, against a rise of 6% in Berg en Dal. 90% of the homes are owner-occupied, 29 percentage points more than in Berg en Dal (61%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€448,000
▲13% higher than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2023
+10%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
90%
▲29 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
10%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1945–1964
10%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (21%)
Built 2016 and later
10%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (12%)
Average WOZ value
€448,000
▲13% higher than Berg en Dal (€395,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2023
+10%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+6%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
90%
▲29 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (61%)
Social housing
0%
▼28 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (28%)
Private rent
10%
=about the same as Berg en Dal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲16 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (79%)
Built 1945–1964
10%
▼11 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (21%)
Built 2016 and later
10%
▲4 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (6%)
Built 1992–2005
14%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 10% between 2023 and 2024, to €448,000.
Average WOZ value, 2024
€448,000▲ 21% above Berg en Dal
+10% since 2023
Berg en Dal +6%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€307 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€307/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
135 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €448,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€123NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€29€39
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€184
Maintenance reserve€172–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Berg en Dal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 64th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 135 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €448,000.
Levies: Berg en Dal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 9 buurten in Groesbeek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €448,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West
448,000
20
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Zuid
353,000
828
–
Groesbeek Centrum-Noord
378,000
1,190
–
Groesbeek Nijerf
404,000
866
–
Groesbeek De Drul-Oost
323,000
877
–
Groesbeek De Drul-West
386,000
539
–
Groesbeek Stekkenberg
361,000
1,169
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord-West
270,000
136
–
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Noord
497,000
344
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 90% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied90%
Private rent10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
43% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Before 194542.9%
1945-19649.5%
1975-199123.8%
1992-200514.3%
2016 and later9.5%
Explanation
Based on 21 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 14 crimes were registered, against 10 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
14
▲up from 10 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
14
▲up from 10 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
14 crimes were registered in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West in 2025 (10 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
14
up from 10 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West is 'Theft and burglary': 6 in 2025.
Theft and burglary6
Traffic5
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats1
Fraud and scams1
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is above the Berg en Dal average.
Forest and natural land is the largest land use in Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West, covering 59% of the area, against 28% in Berg en Dal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 59% of the area, 27 percentage points above the 32% in Berg en Dal.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
59%
▲27 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
59%
▲31 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
39%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (9%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
59%
▲27 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (32%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
59%
▲31 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Agriculture, share of the area
39%
▼9 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (48%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼8 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (9%)
Land use
59% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Traffic1.4%
Built-up0.7%
Recreation0.2%
Agriculture38.7%
Forest and nature59%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 1300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,300 m
–
GP practice
1,500 m
–
Primary school
1,400 m
–
Daycare
1,400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1.1
GP practices
–
0.5
Daycares
–
0.5
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Berg en Dal average.
Buitengebied Groesbeek-Zuid-West has 50 inhabitants (2026), or 11 per km² (97% lower than in Berg en Dal). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Berg en Dal was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+11%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Married
67%
▲25 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+11%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Berg en Dal
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▲higher than Berg en Dal (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲5 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (28%)
Married
67%
▲25 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (42%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (82%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 11% between 2021 and 2026, to 50.
Residents, 2026
50
+11% since 2021
Berg en Dal +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 11 residents per km², this buurt is 97% less densely populated than the municipality of Berg en Dal.
Residents per km²11
Dwellings per km²4.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 155
15 to 255
25 to 4510
45 to 6515
65 to 805
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
67% of residents are married.
Never married15
Married30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
80% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands40
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Berg en Dal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Berg en Dal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Berg en DalThe Netherlands
D66
18.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
14.8%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.6%
12.8%
CDA
10.5%
11.8%
JA21
6.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.3%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
9.3%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Berg en Dal (22%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
31%
▲28 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
81%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
90%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼2 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+3 pp
▼lower than Berg en Dal (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
31%
▲28 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
81%
▼10 percentage points lower than Berg en Dal (91%)
Lodging, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Berg en Dal (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
90%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Berg en Dal (2025).
Petrol80%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 17% to 20% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 2 percentage points below Berg en Dal (22%)
+3 pp since 2021
Berg en Dal +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 25 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars25
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
81% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (31%).
Residential80.8%
Industrial30.8%
Lodging3.8%
Other7.7%
Explanation
Based on 26 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
11 residents per km²: 98% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²11
NL 539▼ −98% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings90%
NL 57%▲ +58% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Private rent10%
NL 14%▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026