The population is growing faster than in Lopik. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Lopik, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Lopikerkapel is €565,000, 17% higher than in Lopik (€483,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 37%, against a rise of 39% in Lopik. 84% of the homes are owner-occupied, 9 percentage points more than in Lopik (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€565,000
▲17% higher than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
▼lower than Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
5%
▼12 percentage points lower than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
11%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lopik (85%)
Built 1945–1964
21%
▲11 percentage points higher than Lopik (10%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼10 percentage points lower than Lopik (20%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
Average WOZ value
€565,000
▲17% higher than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
▼lower than Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
5%
▼12 percentage points lower than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
11%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lopik (85%)
Built 1945–1964
21%
▲11 percentage points higher than Lopik (10%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼10 percentage points lower than Lopik (20%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 37% between 2021 and 2025, to €565,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€565,000▲ 17% above Lopik
+37% since 2021
Lopik +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€381 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€381/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
160 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €565,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€163NL median
Property tax (OZB)€61€50
Water board levy€48–
Sewage levy€29€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€218
Maintenance reserve€204–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lopik's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 283rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 160 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €565,000.
Levies: Lopik's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Lopikerkapel has the 7th-highest WOZ value of the 14 buurten in Lopik, Benschop en Polsbroek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €565,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Lopikerkapel
565,000
229
–
Lopik-Dorp
400,000
2,356
–
Graaf
606,000
283
–
Uitweg
560,000
234
–
Jaarsveld
432,000
114
–
Wielsekade
604,000
128
–
Cabauw
506,000
317
–
Zevender
703,000
62
–
Lekdijk tussen Jaarsveld en Schoonhoven
708,000
152
–
Langs de Lekdijk Lopikerwaard
330,000
157
–
Benschop-Dorp
448,000
1,029
–
Benschop Boveneind-Benedeneind
726,000
387
–
Polsbroek-Dorp
430,000
257
–
Polsbroek-Noordzijdseweg-Zuidzijdseweg
655,000
249
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 84% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied84%
Social housing5%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 16% in the municipality of Lopik.
Before 194526.4%
1945-196420.8%
1965-197410.4%
1975-199120.3%
1992-20058.7%
2006-20152.6%
2016 and later10.8%
Explanation
Based on 231 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Lopik average.
In 2025, 8 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Lopikerkapel, 58% lower than in Lopik (19). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 8%, against a fall of 31% in Lopik. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
8
▼58% lower than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-8%
▲higher than Lopik (-31%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
8
▼58% lower than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-8%
▲higher than Lopik (-31%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Lopikerkapel registered 8 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 19 in the municipality of Lopik.
Lopikerkapel8
The municipality of Lopik19
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Lopikerkapel is 'Traffic': 3.4 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.0 in the municipality of Lopik.
LopikerkapelLopik
Traffic3.4
Lopik 4.0▼ −15% vs Lopik
Theft and burglary1.7
Lopik 4.7▼ −64% vs Lopik
Violence and threats1.7
Lopik 2.8▼ −39% vs Lopik
Fraud and scams1.7
Lopik 3.7▼ −54% vs Lopik
Vandalism and public order0.0
Lopik 2.4▼ −100% vs Lopik
Environmental0.0
Lopik 0.1≈ Lopik
Other and withheld0.0
Lopik 1.1▼ −100% vs Lopik
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Lopikerkapel registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Lopik average; green space is below the Lopik average.
An estimated 80% of adults in Lopikerkapel rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Lopik. Fewer adults feel lonely (36% against 40%), fewer report anxiety or depression (39% against 43%) and fewer are overweight (50% against 53%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (47% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Lopikerkapel, covering 76% of the area, against 87% in Lopik. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 1% of the area, 1 percentage point below the 2% in Lopik.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (2%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (43%)
Lonely
36%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (43%)
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (53%)
Built-up, share of the area
18%
▲13 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▼11 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (4%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (2%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (43%)
Lonely
36%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (40%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
39%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (43%)
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (53%)
Built-up, share of the area
18%
▲13 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Agriculture, share of the area
76%
▼11 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (4%)
Health
An estimated 80% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Lopik (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Lopik
Good self-rated health
79.8%
76.6%
Smokes
12.9%
14.9%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.2%
Overweight
49.6%
52.6%
Lonely
36.3%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
39.2%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.6%
42.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
1.0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 2% in the municipality of Lopik.
Traffic2.9%
Built-up18.4%
Recreation1%
Agriculture75.7%
Water1.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,600 m
–
GP practice
3,900 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.9
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Lopik average.
Lopikerkapel has 580 inhabitants (2026), or 573 per km² (2.9 times as high as in Lopik). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 5%, against a rise of 2% in Lopik. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lopik was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+5%
▲higher than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▲higher than Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (28%)
Never married
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+5%
▲higher than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▲higher than Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (28%)
Never married
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 5% between 2021 and 2026, to 580.
Residents, 2026
580
+5% since 2021
Lopik +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 573 residents per km², this buurt is 2.9 times as densely populated as the municipality of Lopik.
Residents per km²573
Dwellings per km²226.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.4 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1575
15 to 2565
25 to 45135
45 to 65170
65 to 80100
80 and over35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married265
Married255
Divorced35
Widowed20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
90% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands525
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)15
Outside Europe40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1120
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4210
Higher professional, university120
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lopik; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Lopik voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LopikThe Netherlands
D66
8.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
13.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.5%
12.8%
CDA
16.9%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.7%
4.5%
BBB
4.6%
2.6%
Other
16.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Lopikerkapel has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Lopik (1.4). 25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points more than in Lopik (22%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
5%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lopik (12%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
30%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (25%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+10 pp
▲higher than Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲27 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
5%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lopik (12%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
30%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (25%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+10 pp
▲higher than Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
8%
▼29 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲27 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲29 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 30 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie30
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
25% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lopik (2025).
Petrol74.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 16% to 25% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
25%▲ 3 percentage points above Lopik (22%)
+9 pp since 2021
Lopik +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 315 passenger cars and 20 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars315
Motorcycles20
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (6%).
Residential90.6%
Retail0.4%
Office0.4%
Assembly2%
Healthcare0.4%
Industrial5.9%
Education0.4%
Other2.7%
Explanation
Based on 255 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5% social housing, against 28% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Social housing5%
NL 28%▼ −82% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings84%
NL 57%▲ +47% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Average WOZ value€565,000
NL €398,000▲ +42% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025