The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lopik. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Lopik, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Cabauw is €506,000, 5% higher than in Lopik (€483,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 38%, against a rise of 39% in Lopik. 76% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point more than in Lopik (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€506,000
▲5% higher than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
=about the same as Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
15%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
9%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (85%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (8%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (22%)
Average WOZ value
€506,000
▲5% higher than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
=about the same as Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
15%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
9%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (85%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (8%)
Built 1975–1991
19%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (22%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 38% between 2021 and 2025, to €506,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€506,000▲ 5% above Lopik
+38% since 2021
Lopik +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€355 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€355/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
147 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €506,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€155NL median
Property tax (OZB)€55€44
Water board levy€46–
Sewage levy€29€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€200
Maintenance reserve€187–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lopik's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 282nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 147 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €506,000.
Levies: Lopik's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Cabauw has the 6th-lowest WOZ value of the 14 buurten in Lopik, Benschop en Polsbroek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €506,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Cabauw
506,000
317
–
Lopik-Dorp
400,000
2,356
–
Graaf
606,000
283
–
Uitweg
560,000
234
–
Lopikerkapel
565,000
229
–
Jaarsveld
432,000
114
–
Wielsekade
604,000
128
–
Zevender
703,000
62
–
Lekdijk tussen Jaarsveld en Schoonhoven
708,000
152
–
Langs de Lekdijk Lopikerwaard
330,000
157
–
Benschop-Dorp
448,000
1,029
–
Benschop Boveneind-Benedeneind
726,000
387
–
Polsbroek-Dorp
430,000
257
–
Polsbroek-Noordzijdseweg-Zuidzijdseweg
655,000
249
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 76% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied76%
Social housing15%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
21% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 20% in the municipality of Lopik.
Before 194517.2%
1945-196412.9%
1965-197421.3%
1975-199119.1%
1992-200510%
2006-201511.6%
2016 and later7.8%
Explanation
Based on 319 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Lopik average.
In 2025, 17 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Cabauw, 11% lower than in Lopik (19). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 6%, against a fall of 31% in Lopik. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
17
▼11% lower than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-6%
▲higher than Lopik (-31%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.1
▲24% higher than Lopik (1.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
17
▼11% lower than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-6%
▲higher than Lopik (-31%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.1
▲24% higher than Lopik (1.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Cabauw registered 17 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 19 in the municipality of Lopik.
Cabauw17
The municipality of Lopik19
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Cabauw is 'Theft and burglary': 5.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.7 in the municipality of Lopik.
CabauwLopik
Theft and burglary5.2
Lopik 4.7▲ +11% vs Lopik
Fraud and scams5.2
Lopik 3.7▲ +41% vs Lopik
Violence and threats3.9
Lopik 2.8▲ +39% vs Lopik
Vandalism and public order1.3
Lopik 2.4▼ −46% vs Lopik
Traffic1.3
Lopik 4.0▼ −68% vs Lopik
Environmental0.0
Lopik 0.1≈ Lopik
Other and withheld0.0
Lopik 1.1▼ −100% vs Lopik
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2022, police in Cabauw registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2022
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is below the Lopik average.
An estimated 77% of adults in Cabauw rate their own health as good, about the same as in Lopik. Fewer adults are overweight (50% against 53%), fewer feel lonely (37% against 40%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 43%), but more drink excessively (6% against 5%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Cabauw, covering 72% of the area, against 87% in Lopik.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
=about the same as Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (40%)
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (53%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
43%
=about the same as Lopik (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
22%
▲17 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Agriculture, share of the area
72%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Traffic, share of the area
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
=about the same as Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (40%)
Overweight
50%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (53%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
43%
=about the same as Lopik (43%)
Built-up, share of the area
22%
▲17 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Agriculture, share of the area
72%
▼15 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Traffic, share of the area
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (2%)
Health
An estimated 77% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Lopik (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Lopik
Good self-rated health
77.2%
76.6%
Smokes
14.9%
14.9%
Excessive drinking
5.9%
5.2%
Overweight
50.3%
52.6%
Lonely
36.7%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.9%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
43.4%
42.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 2% in the municipality of Lopik.
Traffic3.4%
Built-up21.6%
Agriculture71.6%
Water3.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
4,100 m
–
GP practice
3,900 m
–
Primary school
300 m
–
Daycare
300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lopik.
Cabauw has 760 inhabitants (2026), or 893 per km² (4.6 times as high as in Lopik). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 3%, against a rise of 2% in Lopik. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lopik was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (28%)
Never married
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (28%)
Never married
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
92%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 760.
Residents, 2026
760
-3% since 2021
Lopik +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 893 residents per km², this buurt is 4.6 times as densely populated as the municipality of Lopik.
Residents per km²893
Dwellings per km²372.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 6.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15115
15 to 2590
25 to 45150
45 to 65230
65 to 80145
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
49% of residents are never married.
Never married375
Married325
Divorced35
Widowed30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
92% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands705
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)30
Outside Europe30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
41% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1200
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4240
Higher professional, university150
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lopik; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Lopik voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LopikThe Netherlands
D66
8.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
13.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.5%
12.8%
CDA
16.9%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.7%
4.5%
BBB
4.6%
2.6%
Other
16.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Cabauw has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Lopik (1.4). 28% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points more than in Lopik (22%).
Key figures
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lopik (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (12%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
96%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (3%)
Social housing
15%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
893
▲66% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
12%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lopik (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
8%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (12%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
96%
▲9 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
2%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (3%)
Social housing
15%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
893
▲66% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 30 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie30
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg15
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
28% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lopik (2025).
Petrol72.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)27.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 28% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
28%▲ 6 percentage points above Lopik (22%)
+8 pp since 2021
Lopik +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 395 passenger cars and 40 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars395
Motorcycles40
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
96% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (2%).
Residential95.5%
Office0.6%
Assembly1.5%
Industrial1.8%
Education0.3%
Other2.4%
Explanation
Based on 334 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
12% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings12%
NL 37%▼ −68% vs NL
Social housing15%
NL 28%▼ −46% vs NL
Residents per km²893
NL 539▲ +66% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Single-family dwellings88%
NL 63%▲ +40% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025