The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lopik. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Lopik, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Lopik-Dorp is €400,000, 17% lower than in Lopik (€483,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 41%, against a rise of 39% in Lopik. 69% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points less than in Lopik (75%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€400,000
▼17% lower than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
69%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (85%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
Built 1992–2005
24%
▲8 percentage points higher than Lopik (16%)
Built 1965–1974
25%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (20%)
Average WOZ value
€400,000
▼17% lower than Lopik (€483,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Lopik (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
69%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (75%)
Social housing
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than Lopik (17%)
Private rent
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (8%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (85%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Lopik (16%)
Built 1992–2005
24%
▲8 percentage points higher than Lopik (16%)
Built 1965–1974
25%
▲5 percentage points higher than Lopik (20%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 41% between 2021 and 2025, to €400,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€400,000▼ 17% below Lopik
+41% since 2021
Lopik +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€297 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€297/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
115 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €400,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€140NL median
Property tax (OZB)€43€35
Water board levy€43–
Sewage levy€29€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€157
Maintenance reserve€147–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lopik's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 283rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 115 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €400,000.
Levies: Lopik's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Lopik-Dorp has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 14 buurten in Lopik, Benschop en Polsbroek.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €400,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Lopik-Dorp
400,000
2,356
–
Graaf
606,000
283
–
Uitweg
560,000
234
–
Lopikerkapel
565,000
229
–
Jaarsveld
432,000
114
–
Wielsekade
604,000
128
–
Cabauw
506,000
317
–
Zevender
703,000
62
–
Lekdijk tussen Jaarsveld en Schoonhoven
708,000
152
–
Langs de Lekdijk Lopikerwaard
330,000
157
–
Benschop-Dorp
448,000
1,029
–
Benschop Boveneind-Benedeneind
726,000
387
–
Polsbroek-Dorp
430,000
257
–
Polsbroek-Noordzijdseweg-Zuidzijdseweg
655,000
249
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 69% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied69%
Social housing27%
Private rent5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
81% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes81%
Multi-family homes19%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 22% in the municipality of Lopik.
Before 19453.4%
1945-19647.6%
1965-197425.1%
1975-199128.3%
1992-200523.8%
2006-20158.6%
2016 and later3.2%
Explanation
Based on 2,378 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Lopik average.
In 2025, 20 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Lopik-Dorp, 5% higher than in Lopik (19). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 45%, against a fall of 31% in Lopik. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
20
▲5% higher than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-45%
▼lower than Lopik (-31%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.8
▲6% higher than Lopik (1.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
20
▲5% higher than Lopik (19)
Change since 2021
-45%
▼lower than Lopik (-31%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.8
▲6% higher than Lopik (1.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Lopik-Dorp registered 20 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 19 in the municipality of Lopik.
Lopik-Dorp20
The municipality of Lopik19
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Lopik-Dorp is 'Theft and burglary': 4.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.7 in the municipality of Lopik.
Lopik-DorpLopik
Theft and burglary4.8
Lopik 4.7≈ Lopik
Traffic4.1
Lopik 4.0≈ Lopik
Vandalism and public order3.9
Lopik 2.4▲ +62% vs Lopik
Violence and threats3.0
Lopik 2.8▲ +7% vs Lopik
Fraud and scams2.9
Lopik 3.7▼ −22% vs Lopik
Other and withheld0.9
Lopik 1.1▼ −18% vs Lopik
Environmental0.0
Lopik 0.1≈ Lopik
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Lopik-Dorp registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Lopik average; green space is about the Lopik average.
An estimated 74% of adults in Lopik-Dorp rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Lopik. More adults feel lonely (44% against 40%), more are overweight (56% against 53%) and more report anxiety or depression (45% against 43%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (40% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Lopik-Dorp, covering 58% of the area, against 5% in Lopik. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, in line with the 2% in Lopik.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
=about the same as Lopik (2%)
More figures
Lonely
44%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (40%)
Overweight
56%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (53%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
33%
▼54 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Built-up, share of the area
58%
▲53 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Traffic, share of the area
5%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
74%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (77%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
=about the same as Lopik (2%)
More figures
Lonely
44%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (40%)
Overweight
56%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (53%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lopik (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
40%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lopik (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
33%
▼54 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Built-up, share of the area
58%
▲53 percentage points higher than Lopik (5%)
Traffic, share of the area
5%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lopik (2%)
Health
An estimated 74% of adults rate their own health as good, against 77% in the municipality of Lopik (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Lopik
Good self-rated health
74.1%
76.6%
Smokes
15.9%
14.9%
Excessive drinking
5%
5.2%
Overweight
55.8%
52.6%
Lonely
44%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.1%
42.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
40.3%
42.6%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 2% in the municipality of Lopik.
Traffic5%
Built-up58.2%
Other built-up0.7%
Recreation2.1%
Agriculture32.6%
Water1.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.7
GP practices
–
1.7
Daycares
–
3.1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lopik.
Lopik-Dorp has 5,540 inhabitants (2026), or 3,986 per km² (20.4 times as high as in Lopik). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 2% in Lopik. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lopik was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 21% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-0%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (28%)
Never married
48%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-0%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Lopik
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Lopik (+2%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lopik (28%)
Never married
48%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (47%)
Dutch origin
83%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (87%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lopik (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 5,540.
Residents, 2026
5,540
+0% since 2021
Lopik +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,986 residents per km², this buurt is 20 times as densely populated as the municipality of Lopik.
Residents per km²3,986
Dwellings per km²1,695
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.2 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15890
15 to 25680
25 to 451,385
45 to 651,475
65 to 80845
80 and over275
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married2,650
Married2,250
Divorced355
Widowed280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands4,585
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)255
Outside Europe695
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
46% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,490
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,910
Higher professional, university760
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lopik; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Lopik voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 21% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LopikThe Netherlands
D66
8.6%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
20.8%
16.7%
VVD
13.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
4.5%
12.8%
CDA
16.9%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
6.7%
4.5%
BBB
4.6%
2.6%
Other
16.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Lopik-Dorp has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 7% lower than in Lopik (1.4). 18% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Lopik (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
3%
▼8 percentage points lower than Lopik (11%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (7%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
19%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
3%
▼8 percentage points lower than Lopik (11%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (7%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lopik (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▼7% lower than Lopik (1.4)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
18%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lopik (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Lopik (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lopik (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lopik (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lopik (2%)
Private rent
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
19%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
81%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 145 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie145
Handel en horeca75
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie40
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed25
Zakelijke dienstverlening105
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg80
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
18% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lopik (2025).
Petrol81.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)18.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 18% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
18%▼ 4 percentage points below Lopik (22%)
+4 pp since 2021
Lopik +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 2,900 passenger cars and 280 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars2,900
Motorcycles280
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (3%).
Residential94%
Retail1.2%
Office0.6%
Assembly0.6%
Healthcare3.4%
Industrial0.5%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.2%
Sports0.1%
Other3.4%
Explanation
Based on 2,530 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,986 residents per km²: 7.4 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,986
NL 539▲ +640% vs NL
Private rent5%
NL 14%▼ −64% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings19%
NL 37%▼ −49% vs NL
Single-family dwellings81%
NL 63%▲ +29% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings69%
NL 57%▲ +21% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026