The average WOZ value in Schaapsdrift is €509,000, 16% higher than in Renkum (€440,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 41%, against a rise of 40% in Renkum. 93% of the homes are owner-occupied, 30 percentage points more than in Renkum (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲16% higher than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲30 percentage points higher than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
7%
▼9 percentage points lower than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲21 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Built 1992–2005
16%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (6%)
Built before 1945
24%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (23%)
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲16% higher than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+41%
▲higher than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲30 percentage points higher than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
7%
▼9 percentage points lower than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲21 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1965–1974
7%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Built 1992–2005
16%
▲10 percentage points higher than Renkum (6%)
Built before 1945
24%
▲1 percentage point higher than Renkum (23%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 41% between 2021 and 2025, to €509,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€509,000▲ 16% above Renkum
+41% since 2021
Renkum +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€404 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€404/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
181 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €509,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€157NL median
Property tax (OZB)€65€45
Water board levy€46–
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€247
Maintenance reserve€231–
Buildings insurance€16–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Renkum's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 293rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 181 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €509,000.
Levies: Renkum's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Schaapsdrift has the highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Renkum Noord.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €509,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Schaapsdrift
509,000
45
–
Keijenberg
250,000
7
–
Hogenkamp
373,000
619
–
Bakkershaag
433,000
70
–
Fluitersmaat
369,000
690
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 93% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied93%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
91% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes91%
Multi-family homes9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
49% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 17% in the municipality of Renkum.
Before 194524.4%
1965-19746.7%
1975-199148.9%
1992-200515.6%
2016 and later4.4%
Explanation
Based on 45 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Schaapsdrift has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 2 crimes were registered, against 3 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
2 crimes were registered in Schaapsdrift in 2025 (3 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
2
down from 3 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Schaapsdrift is 'Traffic': 2 in 2025.
Traffic2
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2022, police in Schaapsdrift registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2022
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2022
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Renkum average.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Schaapsdrift, covering 100% of the area, against 19% in Renkum.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲81 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
100%
▲81 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 52% in the municipality of Renkum.
Built-up100%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,400 m
–
GP practice
1,300 m
–
Primary school
500 m
–
Daycare
400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Renkum average.
Schaapsdrift has 105 inhabitants (2026), or 811 per km² (19% higher than in Renkum). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Renkum was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-5%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
36%
▲6 percentage points higher than Renkum (30%)
Married
55%
▲14 percentage points higher than Renkum (41%)
Dutch origin
90%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲67 percentage points higher than Renkum (33%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-5%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
36%
▲6 percentage points higher than Renkum (30%)
Married
55%
▲14 percentage points higher than Renkum (41%)
Dutch origin
90%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
100%
▲67 percentage points higher than Renkum (33%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 5% between 2021 and 2026, to 105.
Residents, 2026
105
-5% since 2021
Renkum +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 811 residents per km², this buurt is 19% more densely populated than the municipality of Renkum.
Residents per km²811
Dwellings per km²346.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
36% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2510
25 to 4515
45 to 6540
65 to 8025
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
55% of residents are married.
Never married35
Married60
Divorced10
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
90% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands90
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
100% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-440
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Renkum; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Renkum voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RenkumThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
10.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
20%
12.8%
CDA
12.2%
11.8%
JA21
4.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.4%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Schaapsdrift has an average of 2.2 cars per household. 35% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Renkum (24%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
40%
▲31 percentage points higher than Renkum (9%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
10%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (22%)
Business services, share of businesses
20%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Cars per household (2021)
2.2
▲2.0 times as high as Renkum (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
35%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
44%
▲43 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
48%
▼41 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Office, share of addresses
12%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Residents per km²
811
▲50% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
40%
▲31 percentage points higher than Renkum (9%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
10%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (22%)
Business services, share of businesses
20%
▼12 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Cars per household (2021)
2.2
▲2.0 times as high as Renkum (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
35%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
44%
▲43 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
48%
▼41 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Office, share of addresses
12%
▲11 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
93%
▲36 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Residents per km²
811
▲50% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie20
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening10
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
35% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Renkum (2025).
Petrol65.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)34.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 27% to 35% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
35%▲ 11 percentage points above Renkum (24%)
+8 pp since 2021
Renkum +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 115 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars115
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
48% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (44%).
Residential48.4%
Retail5.4%
Office11.8%
Assembly4.3%
Healthcare1.1%
Industrial44.1%
Education1.1%
Sports1.1%
Other2.2%
Explanation
Based on 93 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
9% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings93%
NL 57%▲ +63% vs NL
Residents per km²811
NL 539▲ +51% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025