The population is growing, while it shrinks in Renkum. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Renkum, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Hogenkamp is €373,000, 15% lower than in Renkum (€440,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 47%, against a rise of 40% in Renkum. 62% of the homes are owner-occupied, 1 percentage point less than in Renkum (63%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€373,000
▼15% lower than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+47%
▲higher than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
62%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
8%
▼8 percentage points lower than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲17 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1975–1991
39%
▲22 percentage points higher than Renkum (17%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼22 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
Built before 1945
17%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (23%)
Average WOZ value
€373,000
▼15% lower than Renkum (€440,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+47%
▲higher than Renkum (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
62%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (63%)
Social housing
30%
▲9 percentage points higher than Renkum (21%)
Private rent
8%
▼8 percentage points lower than Renkum (16%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲17 percentage points higher than Renkum (70%)
Built 1975–1991
39%
▲22 percentage points higher than Renkum (17%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼22 percentage points lower than Renkum (25%)
Built before 1945
17%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (23%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 47% between 2021 and 2025, to €373,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€373,000▼ 15% below Renkum
+47% since 2021
Renkum +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€297 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€297/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
119 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €373,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€135NL median
Property tax (OZB)€47€33
Water board levy€42–
Waste levy€23€27
Sewage levy€23€22
Costs to set aside€162
Maintenance reserve€151–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Renkum's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 276th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 119 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €373,000.
Levies: Renkum's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Hogenkamp has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Renkum Noord.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €373,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Hogenkamp
373,000
619
–
Keijenberg
250,000
7
–
Bakkershaag
433,000
70
–
Schaapsdrift
509,000
45
–
Fluitersmaat
369,000
690
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 62% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied62%
Social housing30%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
87% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes87%
Multi-family homes13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
40% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 19% in the municipality of Renkum.
Before 194517.4%
1945-19643.2%
1965-197440%
1975-199139%
1992-20050.2%
2016 and later0.2%
Explanation
Based on 620 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Renkum average.
In 2025, 16 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Hogenkamp, 48% lower than in Renkum (31). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 16%, against a fall of 5% in Renkum. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼48% lower than Renkum (31)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Renkum (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▼3% lower than Renkum (3.9)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
16
▼48% lower than Renkum (31)
Change since 2021
-16%
▼lower than Renkum (-5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▼3% lower than Renkum (3.9)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Hogenkamp registered 16 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 31 in the municipality of Renkum.
Hogenkamp16
The municipality of Renkum31
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Hogenkamp is 'Fraud and scams': 8.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.7 in the municipality of Renkum.
HogenkampRenkum
Fraud and scams8.3
Renkum 5.7▲ +46% vs Renkum
Theft and burglary3.0
Renkum 10.9▼ −72% vs Renkum
Vandalism and public order1.5
Renkum 4.0▼ −62% vs Renkum
Violence and threats1.5
Renkum 3.6▼ −58% vs Renkum
Traffic1.5
Renkum 5.9▼ −75% vs Renkum
Environmental0.0
Renkum 0.1≈ Renkum
Other and withheld0.0
Renkum 1.2▼ −100% vs Renkum
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2023, police in Hogenkamp registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2023
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2023
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Renkum average; green space is below the Renkum average.
An estimated 72% of adults in Hogenkamp rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points less than in Renkum. More adults are overweight (54% against 50%), more feel lonely (44% against 42%) and more smoke (15% against 14%), but fewer drink excessively (5% against 6%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Hogenkamp, covering 96% of the area, against 19% in Renkum.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Overweight
54%
▲4 percentage points higher than Renkum (50%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (42%)
Excessive drinking
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (6%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
=about the same as Renkum (44%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲77 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼52 percentage points lower than Renkum (52%)
More figures
Overweight
54%
▲4 percentage points higher than Renkum (50%)
Lonely
44%
▲2 percentage points higher than Renkum (42%)
Excessive drinking
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (6%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
=about the same as Renkum (44%)
Built-up, share of the area
96%
▲77 percentage points higher than Renkum (19%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼45 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Health
An estimated 72% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Renkum (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Renkum
Good self-rated health
72.5%
74.1%
Smokes
15%
14.4%
Excessive drinking
4.7%
5.5%
Overweight
54.4%
49.5%
Lonely
43.8%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
44.5%
43.7%
Meets physical activity guideline
49.8%
49.5%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 52% in the municipality of Renkum.
Traffic4.2%
Built-up95.8%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,300 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
400 m
–
Daycare
400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
1.3
Daycares
–
2.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing, while it shrinks in Renkum.
Hogenkamp has 1,330 inhabitants (2026), or 5,679 per km² (8.3 times as high as in Renkum). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, the same as in Renkum. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Renkum was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
=about the same as Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (30%)
Married
44%
▲3 percentage points higher than Renkum (41%)
Dutch origin
79%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (81%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
39%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
=about the same as Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (30%)
Married
44%
▲3 percentage points higher than Renkum (41%)
Dutch origin
79%
▼2 percentage points lower than Renkum (81%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
39%
▼6 percentage points lower than Renkum (45%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 1,330.
Residents, 2026
1,330
+0% since 2021
Renkum +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 5,679 residents per km², this buurt is 8.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Renkum.
Residents per km²5,679
Dwellings per km²2,691.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 3.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15185
15 to 25120
25 to 45265
45 to 65370
65 to 80315
80 and over80
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married540
Married590
Divorced120
Widowed80
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
79% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,055
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)95
Outside Europe185
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
39% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1230
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4370
Higher professional, university390
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Renkum; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Renkum voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RenkumThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
10.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
20%
12.8%
CDA
12.2%
11.8%
JA21
4.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.4%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Hogenkamp has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 8% lower than in Renkum (1.2). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Renkum (24%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (9%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Renkum (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
=about the same as Renkum (89%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
22%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (9%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼10 percentage points lower than Renkum (32%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
17%
▼5 percentage points lower than Renkum (22%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Renkum (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+6 pp
=about the same as Renkum (+6 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Renkum (1%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
=about the same as Renkum (89%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 25 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca15
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg20
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
23% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Renkum (2025).
Petrol76.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)23.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 17% to 23% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
23%▼ 1 percentage point below Renkum (24%)
+6 pp since 2021
Renkum +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 715 passenger cars and 60 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars715
Motorcycles60
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (0.1%).
Residential89.1%
Industrial0.1%
Other10.9%
Explanation
Based on 696 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5,679 residents per km²: 11 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²5,679
NL 539▲ +954% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Single-family dwellings87%
NL 63%▲ +38% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings62%
NL 57%▲ +9% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026