Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Quadenoord has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 3 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
0
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
0 crimes were registered in Quadenoord in 2025 (3 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
0
down from 3 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
In 2024, police in Quadenoord registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is above the Renkum average.
Forest and natural land is the largest land use in Quadenoord, covering 89% of the area, against 45% in Renkum. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 91% of the area, 39 percentage points above the 52% in Renkum.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
91%
▲39 percentage points higher than Renkum (52%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
89%
▲44 percentage points higher than Renkum (45%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
8%
▼16 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
91%
▲39 percentage points higher than Renkum (52%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
89%
▲44 percentage points higher than Renkum (45%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Renkum (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
8%
▼16 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Land use
91% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 52% in the municipality of Renkum.
Traffic0.8%
Recreation2.5%
Agriculture7.8%
Forest and nature88.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 2000 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,900 m
–
GP practice
2,900 m
–
Primary school
2,200 m
–
Daycare
2,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking slower than the Renkum average.
Quadenoord has 15 inhabitants (2026), or 4 per km² (99% lower than in Renkum). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Renkum was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-25%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Renkum (18%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲19 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-25%
▼lower than Renkum (-0%)
Turnout, municipality of Renkum
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Renkum (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
33%
▲15 percentage points higher than Renkum (18%)
Never married
50%
▲7 percentage points higher than Renkum (43%)
Dutch origin
100%
▲19 percentage points higher than Renkum (81%)
D66, share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 25% between 2021 and 2026, to 15.
Residents, 2026
15
-25% since 2021
Renkum +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4 residents per km², this buurt is 99% less densely populated than the municipality of Renkum.
Residents per km²4
Dwellings per km²1.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 25 and 45.
25 to 455
45 to 655
65 to 805
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married5
Married5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
100% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Renkum; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Renkum voted. The largest party was D66 with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RenkumThe Netherlands
D66
21.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
10.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
20%
12.8%
CDA
12.2%
11.8%
JA21
4.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.5%
4.5%
BBB
1.4%
2.6%
Other
11.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
0% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 24 percentage points less than in Renkum (24%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−33 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
71%
▼18 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Assembly, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Renkum (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−33 pp
▼lower than Renkum (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
71%
▼18 percentage points lower than Renkum (89%)
Assembly, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲13 percentage points higher than Renkum (1%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
0% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Renkum (2025).
Petrol100%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 33% to 0% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
0%▼ 24 percentage points below Renkum (24%)
-33 pp since 2021
Renkum +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 15 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars15
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
71% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (14%).
Residential71.4%
Assembly14.3%
Industrial14.3%
Other14.3%
Explanation
Based on 7 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4 residents per km²: 99% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4
NL 539▼ −99% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026