The average WOZ value in Peel en Maas is €381,000, 4% lower than in the Netherlands (€398,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 66%, against a rise of 89% in the Netherlands. 73% of the homes are owner-occupied, 16 percentage points more than in the Netherlands (57%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€381,000
▼4% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+66%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+89%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
73%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Social housing
19%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Built before 1945
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (18%)
Built 1965–1974
19%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (15%)
Built 2016 and later
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (9%)
Average WOZ value
€381,000
▼4% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+66%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+89%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
73%
▲16 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Social housing
19%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Built before 1945
10%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (18%)
Built 1965–1974
19%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (15%)
Built 2016 and later
7%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (9%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 66% between 2014 and 2025, to €381,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€381,000▼ 4% below the Netherlands
+66% since 2014
Netherlands +89%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
The market in Noord-Limburg
In the Noord-Limburg region (Q3 2026), half of all homes sold for more than €3,619/m², and 71% sold above the asking price.
Figures from NVM estate agents for Q3 2026
Sale price per m²
€3,619/m²
Of the homes sold in Noord-Limburg in Q3 2026, half went for more than €3,619 per m² of living area and half for less. All dwelling types combined.
Asking vs sale price
+3.3%
The final sale price in Noord-Limburg came in 3.3% above the last asking price. Budget for that.
Sold above asking
71%
71% of the homes sold in Noord-Limburg in Q3 2026 went for more than the asking price.
Sale price per m² by dwelling type
Terraced house
€3,393/m²
End-of-terrace house
€3,486/m²
Semi-detached house
€3,552/m²
Detached house
€3,645/m²
Apartment
€3,942/m²
Figures from NVM estate agents covering existing owner-occupied homes in COROP region Noord-Limburg, Q3 2026. A region spans dozens of municipalities, so this describes the surrounding market, not this street or this house.
Source: NVM Marktoverzicht 2026-Q3
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€330 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€330/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
160 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €381,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€112NL median
Water board levy€42–
Sewage levy€27€22
Property tax (OZB)€24€33
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€218
Maintenance reserve€204–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Peel en Maas's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 29th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 160 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €381,000.
Levies: Peel en Maas's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Peel en Maas has the 5th-highest WOZ value of the 31 gemeenten in the province of Limburg.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €381,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Peel en Maas
381,000
19,196
–
Beek (L.)
319,000
7,581
–
Beekdaelen
327,000
16,915
–
Beesel
324,000
6,218
–
Bergen (L.)
358,000
5,887
–
Brunssum
237,000
14,527
–
Echt-Susteren
330,000
15,141
–
Eijsden-Margraten
408,000
11,727
–
Gennep
381,000
7,832
–
Gulpen-Wittem
357,000
6,936
–
Heerlen
214,000
46,795
–
Horst aan de Maas
368,000
18,910
–
Kerkrade
214,000
24,035
–
Landgraaf
265,000
18,291
–
Leudal
363,000
16,412
–
Maasgouw
348,000
11,323
–
Maastricht
313,000
66,249
–
Meerssen
363,000
8,717
–
Mook en Middelaar
451,000
3,785
–
Nederweert
405,000
7,696
–
Roerdalen
325,000
9,866
–
Roermond
311,000
29,894
–
Simpelveld
274,000
5,162
–
Sittard-Geleen
271,000
47,306
–
Stein (L.)
314,000
11,886
–
Vaals
238,000
5,875
–
Valkenburg aan de Geul
343,000
8,400
–
Venlo
312,000
49,137
–
Venray
362,000
19,995
–
Voerendaal
353,000
5,883
–
Weert
357,000
23,912
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 73% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied73%
Social housing19%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 23% in the Netherlands.
Before 194510.1%
1945-196413.9%
1965-197419.4%
1975-199126.1%
1992-200515.3%
2006-20158%
2016 and later7.3%
Explanation
Based on 19,374 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Dutch average.
In 2025, 26 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Peel en Maas, 42% lower than in the Netherlands (45). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 12%, against a rise of 5% in the Netherlands. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
26
▼42% lower than the Netherlands (45)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
=about the same as the Netherlands (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
26
▼42% lower than the Netherlands (45)
Change since 2021
-12%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
=about the same as the Netherlands (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Peel en Maas registered 26 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 45 in the Netherlands.
Peel en Maas26
The Netherlands45
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Peel en Maas is 'Theft and burglary': 9.4 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 19.8 in the Netherlands.
Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
Theft and burglary9.4
NL 19.8▼ −53% vs NL
Traffic4.9
NL 7.6▼ −36% vs NL
Fraud and scams3.8
NL 5.1▼ −25% vs NL
Vandalism and public order3.1
NL 5.1▼ −39% vs NL
Violence and threats3.0
NL 4.8▼ −38% vs NL
Other and withheld1.4
NL 2.1▼ −33% vs NL
Environmental0.1
NL 0.2≈ NL
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Peel en Maas registered 307 traffic accidents, of which 27 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is above the Dutch average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Peel en Maas rate their own health as good, about the same as in the Netherlands. Fewer adults feel lonely (43% against 47%), fewer report anxiety or depression (43% against 47%) and fewer smoke (14% against 17%), but more are overweight (53% against 52%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Peel en Maas, covering 69% of the area, against 52% in the Netherlands. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 19% of the area, 3 percentage points above the 16% in the Netherlands.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
=about the same as the Netherlands (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (16%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Lonely
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Overweight
53%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
69%
▲17 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (13%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
=about the same as the Netherlands (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (16%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Lonely
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Overweight
53%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
69%
▲17 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (13%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the Netherlands (2024).
This areaThe Netherlands
Good self-rated health
73.4%
72.8%
Smokes
14.2%
17.2%
Excessive drinking
6.1%
5.8%
Overweight
53.4%
51.6%
Lonely
43%
47.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.9%
47.3%
Meets physical activity guideline
47.3%
48.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
19% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 16% in the Netherlands.
Traffic2.8%
Built-up8%
Other built-up0.3%
Recreation2.5%
Agriculture69%
Forest and nature16.1%
Water1.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Dutch average.
Peel en Maas has 45,816 inhabitants (2026), or 288 per km² (47% lower than in the Netherlands). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 6%, against a rise of 8% in the Netherlands. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in Peel en Maas was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+6%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+8%)
Turnout
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (26%)
Never married
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (50%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (71%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+6%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+8%)
Turnout
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+8%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (26%)
Never married
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (50%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲13 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (71%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 6% between 2014 and 2026, to 45,816.
Residents, 2026
45,816
+6% since 2014
Netherlands +8%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
Residents per km²: 288.
Residents per km²288
Dwellings per km²120.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.7 children were born per 1,000 residents; 9.8 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 156,194
15 to 254,951
25 to 4510,604
45 to 6512,434
65 to 808,735
80 and over2,898
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married21,162
Married19,314
Divorced2,737
Widowed2,603
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands38,547
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)4,206
Outside Europe3,063
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
46% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo19,740
Havo, vwo, mbo2-415,770
Higher professional, university8,920
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Peel en Maas voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
25.1%
16.7%
VVD
16.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.1%
12.8%
CDA
17.2%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
6.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Peel en Maas has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 18% higher than in the Netherlands (1.1). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in the Netherlands (26%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
10%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (3%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (25%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (8%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than the Netherlands (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+2 pp
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (87%)
Residents per km²
288
▼47% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
19%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
10%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (3%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (25%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
5%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (8%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than the Netherlands (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+2 pp
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (87%)
Residents per km²
288
▼47% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
19%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 1,070 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij570
Nijverheid en energie840
Handel en horeca1,055
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie265
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed305
Zakelijke dienstverlening1,070
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg815
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten570
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the Netherlands (2025).
Petrol80.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 18% to 20% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 6 percentage points below the Netherlands (26%)
+2 pp since 2014
Netherlands +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 25,930 passenger cars and 2,355 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars25,930
Motorcycles2,355
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (5%).
Residential86.3%
Retail1.8%
Office1.5%
Assembly1.2%
Healthcare1%
Industrial5.1%
Lodging5.2%
Education0.1%
Sports0.2%
Other2.2%
Explanation
Based on 22,456 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
15% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Residents per km²288
NL 539▼ −47% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Social housing19%
NL 28%▼ −32% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025