The average WOZ value in Maasgouw is €348,000, 13% lower than in the Netherlands (€398,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 72%, against a rise of 89% in the Netherlands. 75% of the homes are owner-occupied, 18 percentage points more than in the Netherlands (57%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€348,000
▼13% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+89%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Built before 1945
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (18%)
Built 1965–1974
21%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (15%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (13%)
Average WOZ value
€348,000
▼13% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+89%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲18 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Built before 1945
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (18%)
Built 1965–1974
21%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (15%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 72% between 2014 and 2025, to €348,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€348,000▼ 13% below the Netherlands
+72% since 2014
Netherlands +89%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
The market in Midden-Limburg
In the Midden-Limburg region (Q3 2026), half of all homes sold for more than €3,518/m², and 60% sold above the asking price.
Figures from NVM estate agents for Q3 2026
Sale price per m²
€3,518/m²
Of the homes sold in Midden-Limburg in Q3 2026, half went for more than €3,518 per m² of living area and half for less. All dwelling types combined.
Asking vs sale price
+1.8%
The final sale price in Midden-Limburg came in 1.8% above the last asking price. Budget for that.
Sold above asking
60%
60% of the homes sold in Midden-Limburg in Q3 2026 went for more than the asking price.
Sale price per m² by dwelling type
Terraced house
€3,433/m²
End-of-terrace house
€3,350/m²
Semi-detached house
€3,410/m²
Detached house
€3,488/m²
Apartment
€3,932/m²
Figures from NVM estate agents covering existing owner-occupied homes in COROP region Midden-Limburg, Q3 2026. A region spans dozens of municipalities, so this describes the surrounding market, not this street or this house.
Source: NVM Marktoverzicht 2026-Q3
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€353 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€353/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
165 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €348,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€128NL median
Water board levy€42–
Property tax (OZB)€32€31
Sewage levy€29€22
Waste levy€25€27
Costs to set aside€225
Maintenance reserve€210–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Maasgouw's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 232nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 165 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €348,000.
Levies: Maasgouw's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Maasgouw has the 14th-highest WOZ value of the 31 gemeenten in the province of Limburg.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €348,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Maasgouw
348,000
11,323
–
Beek (L.)
319,000
7,581
–
Beekdaelen
327,000
16,915
–
Beesel
324,000
6,218
–
Bergen (L.)
358,000
5,887
–
Brunssum
237,000
14,527
–
Echt-Susteren
330,000
15,141
–
Eijsden-Margraten
408,000
11,727
–
Gennep
381,000
7,832
–
Gulpen-Wittem
357,000
6,936
–
Heerlen
214,000
46,795
–
Horst aan de Maas
368,000
18,910
–
Kerkrade
214,000
24,035
–
Landgraaf
265,000
18,291
–
Leudal
363,000
16,412
–
Maastricht
313,000
66,249
–
Meerssen
363,000
8,717
–
Mook en Middelaar
451,000
3,785
–
Nederweert
405,000
7,696
–
Peel en Maas
381,000
19,196
–
Roerdalen
325,000
9,866
–
Roermond
311,000
29,894
–
Simpelveld
274,000
5,162
–
Sittard-Geleen
271,000
47,306
–
Stein (L.)
314,000
11,886
–
Vaals
238,000
5,875
–
Valkenburg aan de Geul
343,000
8,400
–
Venlo
312,000
49,137
–
Venray
362,000
19,995
–
Voerendaal
353,000
5,883
–
Weert
357,000
23,912
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 75% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied75%
Social housing16%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
87% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes87%
Multi-family homes13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
26% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 23% in the Netherlands.
Before 194512.1%
1945-196418.7%
1965-197421.1%
1975-199125.6%
1992-200512.6%
2006-20152.9%
2016 and later7.1%
Explanation
Based on 11,446 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Dutch average.
In 2025, 27 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Maasgouw, 40% lower than in the Netherlands (45). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 22%, against a rise of 5% in the Netherlands. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼40% lower than the Netherlands (45)
Change since 2021
-22%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼41% lower than the Netherlands (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
27
▼40% lower than the Netherlands (45)
Change since 2021
-22%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.6
▼41% lower than the Netherlands (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Maasgouw registered 27 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 45 in the Netherlands.
Maasgouw27
The Netherlands45
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Maasgouw is 'Theft and burglary': 7.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 19.8 in the Netherlands.
MaasgouwThe Netherlands
Theft and burglary7.8
NL 19.8▼ −61% vs NL
Traffic5.3
NL 7.6▼ −30% vs NL
Fraud and scams3.9
NL 5.1▼ −24% vs NL
Vandalism and public order3.5
NL 5.1▼ −31% vs NL
Violence and threats3.1
NL 4.8▼ −35% vs NL
Other and withheld2.8
NL 2.1▲ +33% vs NL
Environmental0.2
NL 0.2≈ NL
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Maasgouw registered 115 traffic accidents, of which 14 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Dutch average; green space is above the Dutch average.
An estimated 72% of adults in Maasgouw rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point less than in the Netherlands. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (43% against 47%), fewer meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 48%) and fewer smoke (14% against 17%), but more are overweight (54% against 52%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Maasgouw, covering 40% of the area, against 52% in the Netherlands. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 18% of the area, 2 percentage points above the 16% in the Netherlands.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (16%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (48%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Overweight
54%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Agriculture, share of the area
40%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
16%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (9%)
Recreation, share of the area
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (16%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (47%)
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (48%)
Smokes
14%
▼3 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Overweight
54%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (52%)
Agriculture, share of the area
40%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
16%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (9%)
Recreation, share of the area
6%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (3%)
Health
An estimated 72% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the Netherlands (2024).
This areaThe Netherlands
Good self-rated health
72%
72.8%
Smokes
14.1%
17.2%
Excessive drinking
5.1%
5.8%
Overweight
54.4%
51.6%
Lonely
46%
47.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.9%
47.3%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.5%
48.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
18% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 16% in the Netherlands.
Traffic2.9%
Built-up16.3%
Other built-up1%
Recreation6.5%
Agriculture40.3%
Forest and nature11.7%
Water21.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Dutch average.
Maasgouw has 24,377 inhabitants (2026), or 533 per km² (1% lower than in the Netherlands). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 2%, against a rise of 8% in the Netherlands. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in Maasgouw was 76%, 2 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 27% of the vote, against 17% nationally.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+2%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+8%)
Turnout
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (26%)
Married
43%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Dutch origin
82%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (71%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+2%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+8%)
Turnout
76%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+7%
▼lower than the Netherlands (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (26%)
Married
43%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Dutch origin
82%
▲11 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (71%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (41%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 2% between 2014 and 2026, to 24,377.
Residents, 2026
24,377
+2% since 2014
Netherlands +8%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
Residents per km²: 533.
Residents per km²533
Dwellings per km²247.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 13.7 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 152,966
15 to 252,082
25 to 455,285
45 to 656,721
65 to 805,499
80 and over1,824
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
43% of residents are married.
Never married10,278
Married10,527
Divorced1,897
Widowed1,675
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
82% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands19,953
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)2,888
Outside Europe1,536
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
42% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo15,040
Havo, vwo, mbo2-47,590
Higher professional, university5,530
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 76% of eligible voters in Maasgouw voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 27% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MaasgouwThe Netherlands
D66
13.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
26.6%
16.7%
VVD
16.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.7%
12.8%
CDA
14.7%
11.8%
JA21
6.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.2%
4.5%
BBB
2.4%
2.6%
Other
7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Maasgouw has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 18% higher than in the Netherlands (1.1). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in the Netherlands (26%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
21%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (25%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (8%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
12%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than the Netherlands (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
8%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (4%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business services, share of businesses
21%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (25%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (8%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
12%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (11%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲18% higher than the Netherlands (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+4 pp
▼lower than the Netherlands (+5 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
8%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
85%
▼2 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (87%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (4%)
Social housing
16%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 655 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij75
Nijverheid en energie420
Handel en horeca545
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie370
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed160
Zakelijke dienstverlening655
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg545
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten380
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the Netherlands (2025).
Petrol78.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 18% to 22% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%▼ 4 percentage points below the Netherlands (26%)
+4 pp since 2014
Netherlands +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 14,895 passenger cars and 1,350 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars14,895
Motorcycles1,350
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
85% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is lodging (8%).
Residential84.7%
Retail1.7%
Office1.6%
Assembly1.7%
Healthcare1.3%
Industrial2.7%
Lodging7.9%
Education0.2%
Sports0.3%
Other2%
Explanation
Based on 13,520 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
13% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Social housing16%
NL 28%▼ −43% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Single-family dwellings87%
NL 63%▲ +38% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings75%
NL 57%▲ +32% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025