We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Peel en Maas
Living in Egchel
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Peel en Maas. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Peel en Maas, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Egchel is €442,000, 16% higher than in Peel en Maas (€381,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 6%, against a rise of 7% in Peel en Maas. 84% of the homes are owner-occupied, 11 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€442,000
▲16% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+6%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲11 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (7%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Average WOZ value
€442,000
▲16% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+6%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲11 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Built 2016 and later
17%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (7%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 6% between 2024 and 2025, to €442,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€442,000▲ 16% above Peel en Maas
+6% since 2024
Peel en Maas +7%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€336 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€336/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
160 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €442,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€118NL median
Water board levy€44–
Property tax (OZB)€28€39
Sewage levy€27€22
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€218
Maintenance reserve€204–
Buildings insurance€14–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Peel en Maas's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 26th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 160 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €442,000.
Levies: Peel en Maas's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Egchel has the highest WOZ value of the 11 wijken in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €442,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Egchel
442,000
528
–
Panningen
347,000
3,723
–
Kessel
371,000
1,491
–
Maasbree
386,000
2,836
–
Baarlo
376,000
2,821
–
Meijel
393,000
2,718
–
Koningslust
405,000
482
–
Kessel-Eik
371,000
331
–
Helden
393,000
2,726
–
Grashoek
396,000
675
–
Beringe
403,000
865
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 84% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied84%
Social housing9%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
21% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Before 194510%
1945-196411.3%
1965-197410%
1975-199121%
1992-200512.4%
2006-201518.5%
2016 and later17%
Explanation
Based on 542 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Peel en Maas average.
In 2025, 21 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Egchel, 19% lower than in Peel en Maas (26). Since 2024 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 43%, against a rise of 3% in Peel en Maas. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼19% lower than Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
+43%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲41% higher than Peel en Maas (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼19% lower than Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
+43%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.8
▲41% higher than Peel en Maas (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Egchel registered 21 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Egchel21
The municipality of Peel en Maas26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Egchel is 'Violence and threats': 8.6 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 3.0 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
EgchelPeel en Maas
Violence and threats8.6
Peel en Maas 3.0▲ +187% vs Peel en Maas
Theft and burglary4.0
Peel en Maas 9.4▼ −57% vs Peel en Maas
Vandalism and public order4.0
Peel en Maas 3.1▲ +29% vs Peel en Maas
Fraud and scams2.7
Peel en Maas 3.8▼ −29% vs Peel en Maas
Traffic0.7
Peel en Maas 4.9▼ −86% vs Peel en Maas
Other and withheld0.7
Peel en Maas 1.4▼ −50% vs Peel en Maas
Environmental0.0
Peel en Maas 0.1≈ Peel en Maas
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Egchel registered 11 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Peel en Maas average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Egchel rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas. Fewer adults are overweight (51% against 53%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 43%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (49% against 47%) and more smoke (15% against 14%).
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (47%)
Smokes
15%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
More figures
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (47%)
Smokes
15%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Peel en Maas
Good self-rated health
77.9%
73.4%
Smokes
15.3%
14.2%
Excessive drinking
6.1%
6.1%
Overweight
50.9%
53.4%
Lonely
43.4%
43%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.2%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.6%
47.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Peel en Maas.
Egchel has 1,485 inhabitants (2026), or 222 per km² (23% lower than in Peel en Maas). Between 2024 and 2026 the population fell 3%, against a rise of 1% in Peel en Maas. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Peel en Maas was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
-3%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
27%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (23%)
Never married
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
Dutch origin
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
-3%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
27%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (23%)
Never married
53%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
Dutch origin
85%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 3% between 2024 and 2026, to 1,485.
Residents, 2026
1,485
-3% since 2024
Peel en Maas +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 222 residents per km², this wijk is 23% less densely populated than the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Residents per km²222
Dwellings per km²78.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15260
15 to 25140
25 to 45400
45 to 65390
65 to 80260
80 and over35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
53% of residents are never married.
Never married790
Married580
Divorced70
Widowed40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
85% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,265
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)170
Outside Europe55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
48% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1260
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4550
Higher professional, university340
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Peel en Maas; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Peel en Maas voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
25.1%
16.7%
VVD
16.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.1%
12.8%
CDA
17.2%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
6.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Egchel has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 8% lower than in Peel en Maas (1.3). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Peel en Maas (20%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
16%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▼8% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+1 pp
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
222
▼59% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
16%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
6%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▼8% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+1 pp
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Social housing
9%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
222
▼59% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 30 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij25
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca20
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening30
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg25
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2025).
Petrol79.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 20% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%– about the same as Peel en Maas (20%)
+1 pp since 2024
Peel en Maas +2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 735 passenger cars and 65 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars735
Motorcycles65
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (7%).
Residential91.2%
Retail0.7%
Office1.2%
Assembly2.2%
Industrial6.7%
Lodging1.9%
Education0.2%
Sports0.3%
Other7.9%
Explanation
Based on 594 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Social housing9%
NL 28%▼ −68% vs NL
Residents per km²222
NL 539▼ −59% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025