The population is growing slower than in Meppel. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Meppel, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Koedijkslanden is €265,000, 15% lower than in Meppel (€310,000). Between 2016 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 68%, against a rise of 70% in Meppel. 47% of the homes are owner-occupied, 11 percentage points less than in Meppel (58%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€265,000
▼15% lower than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2016
+68%
▼lower than Meppel (+70%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
47%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
43%
▲12 percentage points higher than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
10%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
68%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (73%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼12 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
Average WOZ value
€265,000
▼15% lower than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2016
+68%
▼lower than Meppel (+70%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
47%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
43%
▲12 percentage points higher than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
10%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
68%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (73%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1992–2005
4%
▼12 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 68% between 2016 and 2025, to €265,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€265,000▼ 15% below Meppel
+68% since 2016
Meppel +70%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€262 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€262/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
117 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €265,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€102NL median
Water board levy€39–
Property tax (OZB)€26€23
Waste levy€20€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€160
Maintenance reserve€149–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Meppel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 38th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 117 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €265,000.
Levies: Meppel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Koedijkslanden has the 4th-lowest WOZ value of the 13 wijken in the municipality of Meppel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €265,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Koedijkslanden
265,000
3,160
–
Centrum
283,000
3,699
–
Watertoren
234,000
203
–
Haveltermade
217,000
2,182
–
Berggierslanden
504,000
1,197
–
Ezinge
219,000
393
–
Oosterboer
328,000
3,220
–
Nieuwveenselanden
375,000
817
–
Blankenstein
481,000
23
–
Industrie Oevers
390,000
47
–
Verspreid gebied Meppel
547,000
48
–
Nijeveen
375,000
1,657
–
Rogat
486,000
128
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 47% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied47%
Social housing43%
Private rent10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
68% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes68%
Multi-family homes32%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
64% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 16% in the municipality of Meppel.
Before 19452.8%
1945-19641.3%
1965-197464.2%
1975-199120.3%
1992-20053.5%
2006-20152.3%
2016 and later5.8%
Explanation
Based on 3,194 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Meppel average.
In 2025, 22 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Koedijkslanden, 31% lower than in Meppel (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 20%, against a rise of 11% in Meppel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
22
▼31% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-20%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.4
=about the same as Meppel (2.4)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
22
▼31% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-20%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.4
=about the same as Meppel (2.4)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Koedijkslanden registered 22 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Meppel.
Koedijkslanden22
The municipality of Meppel32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Koedijkslanden is 'Theft and burglary': 7.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 11.9 in the municipality of Meppel.
KoedijkslandenMeppel
Theft and burglary7.1
Meppel 11.9▼ −40% vs Meppel
Violence and threats5.7
Meppel 4.5▲ +27% vs Meppel
Traffic3.2
Meppel 5.8▼ −45% vs Meppel
Fraud and scams3.1
Meppel 4.5▼ −31% vs Meppel
Vandalism and public order1.9
Meppel 4.1▼ −54% vs Meppel
Other and withheld1.2
Meppel 1.5▼ −20% vs Meppel
Environmental0.2
Meppel 0.1≈ Meppel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Koedijkslanden registered 26 traffic accidents, of which 8 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Meppel average; green space is above the Meppel average.
An estimated 70% of adults in Koedijkslanden rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points less than in Meppel. More adults are overweight (58% against 53%), more feel lonely (49% against 46%) and more smoke (18% against 17%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (47% against 49%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Koedijkslanden, covering 63% of the area, against 17% in Meppel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 23% of the area, 17 percentage points above the 6% in Meppel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼4 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼63 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
63%
▲46 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Recreation, share of the area
18%
▲15 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
70%
▼4 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
58%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Meets physical activity guideline
47%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (49%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼63 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
63%
▲46 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Recreation, share of the area
18%
▲15 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Health
An estimated 70% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Meppel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Meppel
Good self-rated health
69.7%
74%
Smokes
17.5%
17%
Excessive drinking
5.1%
6%
Overweight
57.5%
53.4%
Lonely
48.8%
45.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.2%
43.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.8%
48.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
23% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Meppel.
Traffic6.8%
Built-up63.2%
Other built-up0.5%
Recreation17.9%
Agriculture5.8%
Forest and nature4.7%
Water1.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Meppel average.
Koedijkslanden has 6,490 inhabitants (2026), or 3,466 per km² (5.3 times as high as in Meppel). Between 2016 and 2026 the population rose 5%, against a rise of 12% in Meppel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Meppel was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2016
+5%
▼lower than Meppel (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Never married
43%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
81%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2016
+5%
▼lower than Meppel (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Never married
43%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
81%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 5% between 2016 and 2026, to 6,490.
Residents, 2026
6,490
+5% since 2016
Meppel +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,466 residents per km², this wijk is 5.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Meppel.
Residents per km²3,466
Dwellings per km²1,689.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 8.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 17.0 died per 1,000.
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
24% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15965
15 to 25750
25 to 451,460
45 to 651,530
65 to 801,200
80 and over590
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
43% of residents are never married.
Never married2,775
Married2,575
Divorced650
Widowed480
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
81% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands5,260
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)315
Outside Europe915
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
49% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,260
Havo, vwo, mbo2-42,190
Higher professional, university1,060
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Meppel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Meppel voted. The largest party was D66 with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MeppelThe Netherlands
D66
16.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.2%
16.7%
VVD
14.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.8%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.8%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
12.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Koedijkslanden has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 9% lower than in Meppel (1.1). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in Meppel (26%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (19%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (20%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
+1 pp
=about the same as Meppel (0 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (5%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (2%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Average WOZ value
€265,000
▼33% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (19%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (20%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
+1 pp
=about the same as Meppel (0 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (5%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (2%)
Social housing
43%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Average WOZ value
€265,000
▼33% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Private rent
10%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 125 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie75
Handel en horeca85
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie25
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening110
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg125
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Meppel (2025).
Petrol79.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 20% between 2016 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 6 percentage points below Meppel (26%)
+0 pp since 2016
Meppel +0 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 3,000 passenger cars and 260 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars3,000
Motorcycles260
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (5%).
Residential88.2%
Retail0.5%
Office0.1%
Assembly0.3%
Healthcare5.5%
Industrial0.1%
Education0.3%
Sports0.1%
Other9.9%
Explanation
Based on 3,623 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,466 residents per km²: 6.4 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,466
NL 539▲ +543% vs NL
Social housing43%
NL 28%▲ +54% vs NL
Average WOZ value€265,000
NL €398,000▼ −33% vs NL
Private rent10%
NL 14%▼ −29% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings47%
NL 57%▼ −17% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026