The population is growing faster than in Meppel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Meppel, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Blankenstein is €481,000, 55% higher than in Meppel (€310,000). Between 2019 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 100%, against a rise of 55% in Meppel. 91% of the homes are owner-occupied, 33 percentage points more than in Meppel (58%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€481,000
▲55% higher than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+100%
▲higher than Meppel (+55%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲33 percentage points higher than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲27 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
Average WOZ value
€481,000
▲55% higher than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+100%
▲higher than Meppel (+55%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲33 percentage points higher than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
0%
▼31 percentage points lower than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲27 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼10 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Built 2016 and later
5%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 100% between 2019 and 2025, to €481,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€481,000▲ 55% above Meppel
+100% since 2019
Meppel +55%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€289 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€289/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
117 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €481,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€129NL median
Property tax (OZB)€47€42
Water board levy€45–
Waste levy€20€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€160
Maintenance reserve€149–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Meppel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 72nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 117 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €481,000.
Levies: Meppel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Blankenstein has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 13 wijken in the municipality of Meppel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €481,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Blankenstein
481,000
23
–
Centrum
283,000
3,699
–
Watertoren
234,000
203
–
Haveltermade
217,000
2,182
–
Koedijkslanden
265,000
3,160
–
Berggierslanden
504,000
1,197
–
Ezinge
219,000
393
–
Oosterboer
328,000
3,220
–
Nieuwveenselanden
375,000
817
–
Industrie Oevers
390,000
47
–
Verspreid gebied Meppel
547,000
48
–
Nijeveen
375,000
1,657
–
Rogat
486,000
128
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 91% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied91%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
82% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 16% in the municipality of Meppel.
Before 194581.8%
1975-19919.1%
1992-20054.5%
2016 and later4.5%
Explanation
Based on 22 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Meppel average.
In 2025, 81 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Blankenstein, 2.5 times as high as in Meppel (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 50%, against a rise of 11% in Meppel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
81
▲2.5 times as high as Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-50%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
81
▲2.5 times as high as Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-50%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Blankenstein registered 81 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Meppel.
Blankenstein81
The municipality of Meppel32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Blankenstein is 'Traffic': 23.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.8 in the municipality of Meppel.
BlankensteinMeppel
Traffic23.1
Meppel 5.8▲ +298% vs Meppel
Theft and burglary15.4
Meppel 11.9▲ +29% vs Meppel
Vandalism and public order15.4
Meppel 4.1▲ +276% vs Meppel
Violence and threats15.4
Meppel 4.5▲ +242% vs Meppel
Other and withheld7.7
Meppel 1.5▲ +413% vs Meppel
Fraud and scams3.8
Meppel 4.5▼ −16% vs Meppel
Environmental0.0
Meppel 0.1≈ Meppel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Blankenstein registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Meppel average; green space is above the Meppel average.
An estimated 71% of adults in Blankenstein rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Meppel. Fewer adults are overweight (24% against 53%), but more feel lonely (66% against 46%), more report anxiety or depression (62% against 44%) and more meet the physical activity guideline (67% against 49%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Blankenstein, covering 68% of the area, against 17% in Meppel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 15% of the area, 9 percentage points above the 6% in Meppel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▲9 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
24%
▼29 percentage points lower than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
66%
▲20 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
62%
▲18 percentage points higher than Meppel (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
67%
▲18 percentage points higher than Meppel (49%)
Agriculture, share of the area
5%
▼64 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
68%
▲51 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Recreation, share of the area
15%
▲12 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
15%
▲9 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
24%
▼29 percentage points lower than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
66%
▲20 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
62%
▲18 percentage points higher than Meppel (44%)
Meets physical activity guideline
67%
▲18 percentage points higher than Meppel (49%)
Agriculture, share of the area
5%
▼64 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
68%
▲51 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Recreation, share of the area
15%
▲12 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Health
An estimated 71% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Meppel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Meppel
Good self-rated health
71.2%
74%
Smokes
21.1%
17%
Excessive drinking
13.8%
6%
Overweight
23.8%
53.4%
Lonely
66.5%
45.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
62.5%
43.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
67.4%
48.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
15% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Meppel.
Traffic7.5%
Built-up67.5%
Other built-up5%
Recreation15%
Agriculture5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Meppel average.
Blankenstein has 255 inhabitants (2026), or 653 per km² (1% lower than in Meppel). Between 2016 and 2026 the population rose 410%, against a rise of 12% in Meppel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Meppel was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2016
+410%
▲higher than Meppel (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+10%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Aged 15 to 25
71%
▲58 percentage points higher than Meppel (13%)
Never married
87%
▲39 percentage points higher than Meppel (48%)
European origin (not Dutch)
49%
▲43 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2016
+410%
▲higher than Meppel (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+10%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Aged 15 to 25
71%
▲58 percentage points higher than Meppel (13%)
Never married
87%
▲39 percentage points higher than Meppel (48%)
European origin (not Dutch)
49%
▲43 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 410% between 2016 and 2026, to 255.
Residents, 2026
255
+410% since 2016
Meppel +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 653 residents per km², this wijk is 1% less densely populated than the municipality of Meppel.
Residents per km²653
Dwellings per km²59
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
71% of residents are between 15 and 25.
0 to 1510
15 to 25180
25 to 4535
45 to 6520
65 to 8010
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
86% of residents are never married.
Never married225
Married25
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
49% of residents have European origin (outside the Netherlands).
Netherlands80
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)125
Outside Europe50
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Meppel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Meppel voted. The largest party was D66 with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MeppelThe Netherlands
D66
16.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.2%
16.7%
VVD
14.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.8%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.8%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
12.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Blankenstein has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 9% lower than in Meppel (1.1). 56% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 30 percentage points more than in Meppel (26%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
32%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (24%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
3%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
56%
▲30 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
−2 pp
▼lower than Meppel (0 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
13%
▼75 percentage points lower than Meppel (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
42%
▲37 percentage points higher than Meppel (5%)
Office, share of addresses
28%
▲27 percentage points higher than Meppel (1%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
653
▲21% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Business services, share of businesses
32%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (24%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
3%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (11%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼9% lower than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
56%
▲30 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2016
−2 pp
▼lower than Meppel (0 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
13%
▼75 percentage points lower than Meppel (88%)
Industrial, share of addresses
42%
▲37 percentage points higher than Meppel (5%)
Office, share of addresses
28%
▲27 percentage points higher than Meppel (1%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Residents per km²
653
▲21% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie20
Handel en horeca40
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie15
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg20
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
56% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Meppel (2025).
Petrol44.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)55.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 57% to 56% between 2016 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
56%▲ 30 percentage points above Meppel (26%)
-1 pp since 2016
Meppel +0 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 225 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars225
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
13% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (42%).
Residential13.4%
Retail14%
Office28%
Assembly0.6%
Industrial42.1%
Lodging1.2%
Sports1.2%
Other1.2%
Explanation
Based on 164 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
91% owner-occupied dwellings, against 57% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Owner-occupied dwellings91%
NL 57%▲ +60% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Residents per km²653
NL 539▲ +21% vs NL
Average WOZ value€481,000
NL €398,000▲ +21% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025