We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Meppel
Living in Hesselingen
The population is growing slower than in Meppel. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Meppel, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Hesselingen is €247,000, 20% lower than in Meppel (€310,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 37%, the same as in Meppel. 50% of the homes are owner-occupied, 8 percentage points less than in Meppel (58%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€247,000
▼20% lower than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
=about the same as Meppel (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
50%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
36%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲11 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1965–1974
49%
▲33 percentage points higher than Meppel (16%)
Built before 1945
2%
▼14 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Average WOZ value
€247,000
▼20% lower than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+37%
=about the same as Meppel (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
50%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
36%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲11 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1965–1974
49%
▲33 percentage points higher than Meppel (16%)
Built before 1945
2%
▼14 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 37% between 2021 and 2025, to €247,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€247,000▼ 20% below Meppel
+37% since 2021
Meppel +37%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€255 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€255/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
114 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €247,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€100NL median
Water board levy€39–
Property tax (OZB)€24€22
Waste levy€20€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€155
Maintenance reserve€145–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Meppel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 33rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 114 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €247,000.
Levies: Meppel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Hesselingen has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Koedijkslanden.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €247,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Hesselingen
247,000
916
–
Koeberg
218,000
945
–
Reestlanden
328,000
320
–
Schildersbuurt
308,000
979
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 50% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied50%
Social housing36%
Private rent15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
84% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes84%
Multi-family homes16%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
49% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 19% in the municipality of Meppel.
Before 19451.7%
1965-197448.9%
1975-199149.3%
Explanation
Based on 916 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Meppel average.
In 2025, 15 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Hesselingen, 53% lower than in Meppel (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 45%, against a rise of 11% in Meppel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼53% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-45%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.9
▲21% higher than Meppel (2.4)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼53% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
-45%
▼lower than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.9
▲21% higher than Meppel (2.4)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Hesselingen registered 15 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Meppel.
Hesselingen15
The municipality of Meppel32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Hesselingen is 'Theft and burglary': 5.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 11.9 in the municipality of Meppel.
HesselingenMeppel
Theft and burglary5.0
Meppel 11.9▼ −58% vs Meppel
Fraud and scams3.5
Meppel 4.5▼ −22% vs Meppel
Violence and threats2.5
Meppel 4.5▼ −44% vs Meppel
Traffic1.5
Meppel 5.8▼ −74% vs Meppel
Other and withheld1.5
Meppel 1.5≈ Meppel
Vandalism and public order1.0
Meppel 4.1▼ −76% vs Meppel
Environmental0.0
Meppel 0.1≈ Meppel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Hesselingen registered 5 traffic accidents, of which 4 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Meppel average; green space is above the Meppel average.
An estimated 71% of adults in Hesselingen rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Meppel. More adults are overweight (59% against 53%), more feel lonely (49% against 46%) and more smoke (18% against 17%), but fewer drink excessively (5% against 6%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Hesselingen, covering 52% of the area, against 17% in Meppel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 46% of the area, 40 percentage points above the 6% in Meppel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
46%
▲40 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
59%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (44%)
Smokes
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼69 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Recreation, share of the area
46%
▲43 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Built-up, share of the area
52%
▲35 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
46%
▲40 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Overweight
59%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (53%)
Lonely
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (44%)
Smokes
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼69 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Recreation, share of the area
46%
▲43 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Built-up, share of the area
52%
▲35 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Health
An estimated 71% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Meppel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Meppel
Good self-rated health
70.7%
74%
Smokes
18.1%
17%
Excessive drinking
5.1%
6%
Overweight
58.8%
53.4%
Lonely
48.8%
45.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
44.7%
43.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
48.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
46% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Meppel.
Traffic1.8%
Built-up51.8%
Recreation46.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
900 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1.8
GP practices
–
0.9
Daycares
–
1.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Meppel average.
Hesselingen has 1,985 inhabitants (2026), or 3,580 per km² (5.4 times as high as in Meppel). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 1%, against a rise of 6% in Meppel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Meppel was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Meppel (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Meppel (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
24%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (25%)
Never married
41%
▼7 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+1%
▼lower than Meppel (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Meppel (+4%)
Aged 25 to 45
24%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (25%)
Never married
41%
▼7 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼3 percentage points lower than Meppel (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (43%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 1% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,985.
Residents, 2026
1,985
+1% since 2021
Meppel +6%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,580 residents per km², this buurt is 5.4 times as densely populated as the municipality of Meppel.
Residents per km²3,580
Dwellings per km²1,665.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 5.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 22.7 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
24% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15335
15 to 25215
25 to 45470
45 to 65465
65 to 80325
80 and over170
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
41% of residents are never married.
Never married820
Married815
Divorced190
Widowed160
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
80% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,585
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)95
Outside Europe305
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
49% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1400
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4660
Higher professional, university290
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Meppel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Meppel voted. The largest party was D66 with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MeppelThe Netherlands
D66
16.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.2%
16.7%
VVD
14.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.8%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.8%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
12.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Hesselingen has an average of 1.1 cars per household, about the same as in Meppel (1.1). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in Meppel (26%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
26%
▲7 percentage points higher than Meppel (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Meppel (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
=about the same as Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Meppel (+1 pp)
Healthcare, share of addresses
12%
▲9 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (88%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
16%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€247,000
▼38% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲21 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
26%
▲7 percentage points higher than Meppel (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▲4 percentage points higher than Meppel (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
=about the same as Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼6 percentage points lower than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Meppel (+1 pp)
Healthcare, share of addresses
12%
▲9 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (88%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
16%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€247,000
▼38% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲21 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 40 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening30
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg40
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Meppel (2025).
Petrol79.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 21% to 20% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 6 percentage points below Meppel (26%)
-1 pp since 2021
Meppel +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 865 passenger cars and 50 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars865
Motorcycles50
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (12%).
Residential89%
Assembly0.5%
Healthcare11.6%
Sports0.3%
Other9.4%
Explanation
Based on 1,029 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,580 residents per km²: 6.6 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,580
NL 539▲ +564% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings16%
NL 37%▼ −57% vs NL
Average WOZ value€247,000
NL €398,000▼ −38% vs NL
Single-family dwellings84%
NL 63%▲ +33% vs NL
Social housing36%
NL 28%▲ +29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026