We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Lingewaard
Living in Bemmel
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lingewaard. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Lingewaard, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Bemmel is €429,000, 3% higher than in Lingewaard (€415,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 72%, against a rise of 80% in Lingewaard. 75% of the homes are owner-occupied, 2 percentage points more than in Lingewaard (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€429,000
▲3% higher than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
17%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
8%
=about the same as Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
83%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (8%)
Built 2006–2015
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (10%)
Built 1975–1991
24%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (26%)
Average WOZ value
€429,000
▲3% higher than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
75%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
17%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
8%
=about the same as Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
83%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼5 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (8%)
Built 2006–2015
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (10%)
Built 1975–1991
24%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (26%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 72% between 2014 and 2025, to €429,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€429,000▲ 3% above Lingewaard
+72% since 2014
Lingewaard +80%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€327 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€327/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
136 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €429,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€142NL median
Property tax (OZB)€50€38
Water board levy€44–
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€21€22
Costs to set aside€185
Maintenance reserve€173–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lingewaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 263rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 136 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €429,000.
Levies: Lingewaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Bemmel has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 7 wijken in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €429,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Bemmel
429,000
5,277
–
Gendt
388,000
3,237
–
Huissen
414,000
8,834
–
Angeren
427,000
1,176
–
Doornenburg
422,000
1,157
–
Haalderen
396,000
840
–
Ressen
732,000
46
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 75% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied75%
Social housing17%
Private rent8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
83% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes83%
Multi-family homes17%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
34% of dwellings were built between 1992 and 2005, against 19% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Before 19454.9%
1945-196412.4%
1965-197414.9%
1975-199124.3%
1992-200534.1%
2006-20156%
2016 and later3.4%
Explanation
Based on 5,293 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Lingewaard average.
In 2025, 21 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Bemmel, 5% lower than in Lingewaard (22). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 38%, against a fall of 10% in Lingewaard. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼5% lower than Lingewaard (22)
Change since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Lingewaard (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
▲35% higher than Lingewaard (2.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼5% lower than Lingewaard (22)
Change since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Lingewaard (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.7
▲35% higher than Lingewaard (2.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Bemmel registered 21 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 22 in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Bemmel21
The municipality of Lingewaard22
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Bemmel is 'Theft and burglary': 8.6 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 8.1 in the municipality of Lingewaard.
BemmelLingewaard
Theft and burglary8.6
Lingewaard 8.1▲ +6% vs Lingewaard
Fraud and scams3.3
Lingewaard 4.4▼ −25% vs Lingewaard
Traffic3.2
Lingewaard 3.6▼ −11% vs Lingewaard
Vandalism and public order2.9
Lingewaard 2.6▲ +12% vs Lingewaard
Violence and threats2.0
Lingewaard 2.2▼ −9% vs Lingewaard
Other and withheld0.6
Lingewaard 0.7≈ Lingewaard
Environmental0.0
Lingewaard 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Bemmel registered 46 traffic accidents, of which 5 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Lingewaard average; green space is below the Lingewaard average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Bemmel rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point more than in Lingewaard. Fewer adults smoke (12% against 14%), fewer are overweight (52% against 54%), fewer feel lonely (39% against 40%) and fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Bemmel, covering 51% of the area, against 50% in Lingewaard. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 11% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 18% in Lingewaard.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
11%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (18%)
More figures
Overweight
52%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (54%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (14%)
Lonely
39%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Built-up, share of the area
22%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (50%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
11%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (18%)
More figures
Overweight
52%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (54%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (14%)
Lonely
39%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (40%)
Meets physical activity guideline
49%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (48%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Built-up, share of the area
22%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Agriculture, share of the area
51%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (50%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Lingewaard (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Lingewaard
Good self-rated health
75.8%
74.7%
Smokes
12.4%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
5%
5.1%
Overweight
51.5%
53.5%
Lonely
38.9%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
42.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.9%
48%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
11% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Traffic3.6%
Built-up21.9%
Other built-up2.2%
Recreation2.5%
Agriculture51.1%
Forest and nature8.3%
Water10.4%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Lingewaard.
Bemmel has 12,290 inhabitants (2026), or 864 per km² (12% higher than in Lingewaard). Between 2014 and 2026 the population fell 39%, against a rise of 4% in Lingewaard. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lingewaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
-39%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-34%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (43%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (44%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
-39%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-34%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (43%)
Dutch origin
87%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
41%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (44%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 39% between 2014 and 2026, to 12,290.
Residents, 2026
12,290
-39% since 2014
Lingewaard +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 864 residents per km², this wijk is 12% more densely populated than the municipality of Lingewaard.
Residents per km²864
Dwellings per km²370.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.9 children were born per 1,000 residents; 13.5 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,705
15 to 251,500
25 to 452,305
45 to 653,610
65 to 802,395
80 and over775
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married5,325
Married5,420
Divorced825
Widowed720
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
87% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands10,705
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)720
Outside Europe865
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
41% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo12,300
Havo, vwo, mbo2-43,710
Higher professional, university3,080
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lingewaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Lingewaard voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LingewaardThe Netherlands
D66
19.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.5%
16.7%
VVD
19.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
7.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.8%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Bemmel has an average of 1.3 cars per household, about the same as in Lingewaard (1.3). 23% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Lingewaard (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Lingewaard (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
=about the same as Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
=about the same as Lingewaard (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Lingewaard (1%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
864
▲60% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (15%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
17%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (16%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Lingewaard (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
23%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+6 pp
=about the same as Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
4%
=about the same as Lingewaard (4%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Lingewaard (1%)
Private rent
8%
▼6 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
864
▲60% higher than the Netherlands (539)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 360 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij45
Nijverheid en energie180
Handel en horeca250
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie80
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed95
Zakelijke dienstverlening360
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg325
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten145
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
23% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lingewaard (2025).
Petrol76.9%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)23.1%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 17% to 23% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
23%▲ 1 percentage point above Lingewaard (22%)
+6 pp since 2014
Lingewaard +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 6,710 passenger cars and 610 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars6,710
Motorcycles610
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (4%).
Residential87.9%
Retail1.7%
Office0.8%
Assembly0.7%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial4.2%
Lodging0.2%
Education0.2%
Sports0.2%
Other4.9%
Explanation
Based on 6,021 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
17% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings17%
NL 37%▼ −54% vs NL
Private rent8%
NL 14%▼ −43% vs NL
Social housing17%
NL 28%▼ −39% vs NL
Residents per km²864
NL 539▲ +60% vs NL
Single-family dwellings83%
NL 63%▲ +32% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025