The population is growing about as fast as in Lingewaard. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Lingewaard, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Gendt is €388,000, 7% lower than in Lingewaard (€415,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 72%, against a rise of 80% in Lingewaard. 67% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points less than in Lingewaard (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€388,000
▼7% lower than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
67%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
26%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Built 1945–1964
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (14%)
Built 2006–2015
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (10%)
Average WOZ value
€388,000
▼7% lower than Lingewaard (€415,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+72%
▼lower than Lingewaard (+80%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
67%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (73%)
Social housing
26%
▲7 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (8%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (82%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Built 1945–1964
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (14%)
Built 2006–2015
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 72% between 2014 and 2025, to €388,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€388,000▼ 7% below Lingewaard
+72% since 2014
Lingewaard +80%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€321 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€321/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
136 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €388,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€136NL median
Property tax (OZB)€45€34
Water board levy€43–
Waste levy€27€27
Sewage levy€21€22
Costs to set aside€185
Maintenance reserve€173–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Lingewaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 259th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 136 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €388,000.
Levies: Lingewaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Gendt has the lowest WOZ value of the 7 wijken in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €388,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Gendt
388,000
3,237
–
Bemmel
429,000
5,277
–
Huissen
414,000
8,834
–
Angeren
427,000
1,176
–
Doornenburg
422,000
1,157
–
Haalderen
396,000
840
–
Ressen
732,000
46
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 67% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied67%
Social housing26%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
85% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes85%
Multi-family homes15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
23% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Before 19459.1%
1945-196419.7%
1965-197419%
1975-199123%
1992-200512%
2006-20156.5%
2016 and later10.8%
Explanation
Based on 3,276 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Lingewaard average.
In 2025, 14 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Gendt, 36% lower than in Lingewaard (22). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 27%, against a fall of 10% in Lingewaard. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼36% lower than Lingewaard (22)
Change since 2021
-27%
▼lower than Lingewaard (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼40% lower than Lingewaard (2.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
14
▼36% lower than Lingewaard (22)
Change since 2021
-27%
▼lower than Lingewaard (-10%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼40% lower than Lingewaard (2.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Gendt registered 14 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 22 in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Gendt14
The municipality of Lingewaard22
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Gendt is 'Fraud and scams': 4.9 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.4 in the municipality of Lingewaard.
GendtLingewaard
Fraud and scams4.9
Lingewaard 4.4▲ +11% vs Lingewaard
Theft and burglary3.9
Lingewaard 8.1▼ −52% vs Lingewaard
Traffic2.4
Lingewaard 3.6▼ −33% vs Lingewaard
Violence and threats1.5
Lingewaard 2.2▼ −32% vs Lingewaard
Vandalism and public order0.9
Lingewaard 2.6▼ −65% vs Lingewaard
Other and withheld0.8
Lingewaard 0.7≈ Lingewaard
Environmental0.0
Lingewaard 0.0
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Gendt registered 16 traffic accidents, of which 7 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Lingewaard average; green space is above the Lingewaard average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Gendt rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points less than in Lingewaard. Fewer adults meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 48%), but more are overweight (55% against 54%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Gendt, covering 48% of the area, against 50% in Lingewaard. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 19% of the area, 1 percentage point above the 18% in Lingewaard.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (18%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (48%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
=about the same as Lingewaard (43%)
Excessive drinking
5%
=about the same as Lingewaard (5%)
Water, share of the area
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (16%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (18%)
More figures
Overweight
55%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼2 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (48%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
43%
=about the same as Lingewaard (43%)
Excessive drinking
5%
=about the same as Lingewaard (5%)
Water, share of the area
15%
▲4 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (11%)
Built-up, share of the area
13%
▼3 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (16%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
18%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Lingewaard (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Lingewaard
Good self-rated health
73%
74.7%
Smokes
14%
13.8%
Excessive drinking
5.3%
5.1%
Overweight
55.3%
53.5%
Lonely
40.3%
40.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
43.3%
42.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.3%
48%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
19% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Lingewaard.
Traffic2.5%
Built-up12.7%
Other built-up2.5%
Recreation1.4%
Agriculture47.9%
Forest and nature17.9%
Water15.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Lingewaard average.
Gendt has 7,495 inhabitants (2026), or 624 per km² (19% lower than in Lingewaard). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 4%, the same as in Lingewaard. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Lingewaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+4%
=about the same as Lingewaard (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
=about the same as Lingewaard (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Lingewaard (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (44%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+4%
=about the same as Lingewaard (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of Lingewaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
=about the same as Lingewaard (+9%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
=about the same as Lingewaard (28%)
Married
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (43%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (44%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 4% between 2014 and 2026, to 7,495.
Residents, 2026
7,495
+4% since 2014
Lingewaard +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 624 residents per km², this wijk is 19% less densely populated than the municipality of Lingewaard.
Residents per km²624
Dwellings per km²269.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 12.6 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,015
15 to 25905
25 to 451,510
45 to 652,135
65 to 801,460
80 and over475
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
44% of residents are married.
Never married3,265
Married3,275
Divorced490
Widowed465
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands6,615
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)420
Outside Europe465
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,720
Havo, vwo, mbo2-42,590
Higher professional, university1,250
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Lingewaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Lingewaard voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of LingewaardThe Netherlands
D66
19.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.5%
16.7%
VVD
19.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
7.2%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.8%
4.5%
BBB
2.3%
2.6%
Other
7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Gendt has an average of 1.3 cars per household, about the same as in Lingewaard (1.3). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Lingewaard (22%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
13%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
18%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Lingewaard (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
=about the same as Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Lingewaard (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
67%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
13%
▼6 percentage points lower than Lingewaard (19%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
18%
▲3 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (15%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Lingewaard (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
=about the same as Lingewaard (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
=about the same as Lingewaard (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
5%
▲1 percentage point higher than Lingewaard (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▼1 percentage point lower than Lingewaard (90%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
=about the same as Lingewaard (1%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Single-family dwellings
85%
▲22 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
67%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 205 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij50
Nijverheid en energie155
Handel en horeca130
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie50
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed70
Zakelijke dienstverlening205
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg115
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten95
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Lingewaard (2025).
Petrol78.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 16% to 21% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▼ 1 percentage point below Lingewaard (22%)
+5 pp since 2014
Lingewaard +6 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 4,200 passenger cars and 415 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars4,200
Motorcycles415
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (5%).
Residential89.2%
Retail1.7%
Office0.5%
Assembly0.7%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial5.4%
Lodging0.1%
Education0.1%
Sports0.2%
Other3.4%
Explanation
Based on 3,673 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
15% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings15%
NL 37%▼ −59% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Single-family dwellings85%
NL 63%▲ +35% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings67%
NL 57%▲ +18% vs NL
Residents per km²624
NL 539▲ +16% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025