The average WOZ value in Schoonouwen is €701,000, 69% higher than in Krimpenerwaard (€414,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 34%, against a rise of 40% in Krimpenerwaard. 88% of the homes are owner-occupied, 21 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€701,000
▲69% higher than Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲21 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
12%
▲5 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
Built 1965–1974
16%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (11%)
Average WOZ value
€701,000
▲69% higher than Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+34%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲21 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
12%
▲5 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
82%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
Built 1965–1974
16%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1945–1964
6%
▼5 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 34% between 2021 and 2025, to €701,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€701,000▲ 69% above Krimpenerwaard
+34% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€540 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€540/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
282 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €701,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€155NL median
Property tax (OZB)€53€62
Water board levy€52–
Waste levy€26€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€385
Maintenance reserve€360–
Buildings insurance€25–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Krimpenerwaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 95th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 282 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €701,000.
Levies: Krimpenerwaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Schoonouwen has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Stolwijk.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €701,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Schoonouwen
701,000
51
–
Stolwijk
408,000
1,633
–
Bovenkerk
641,000
88
–
Benedenkerk
645,000
107
–
Benedenheul
719,000
74
–
Het Beijersche
660,000
121
–
Koolwijk
793,000
33
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 88% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied88%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
82% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes82%
Multi-family homes18%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
43% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 18% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Before 194543.1%
1945-19645.9%
1965-197415.7%
1975-199111.8%
1992-200511.8%
2006-20157.8%
2016 and later3.9%
Explanation
Based on 51 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Schoonouwen has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 1 crimes were registered, against 3 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
1
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
1
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
1 crimes were registered in Schoonouwen in 2025 (3 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
1
down from 3 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Schoonouwen is 'Traffic': 1 in 2025.
Traffic1
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Schoonouwen registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Krimpenerwaard average; green space is below the Krimpenerwaard average.
An estimated 84% of adults in Schoonouwen rate their own health as good, 9 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard. Fewer adults feel lonely (32% against 42%), fewer report anxiety or depression (36% against 44%) and fewer are overweight (49% against 54%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (45% against 42%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Schoonouwen, covering 95% of the area, against 80% in Krimpenerwaard.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
84%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼10 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
95%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Water, share of the area
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
84%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼10 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Overweight
49%
▼5 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
95%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Water, share of the area
4%
▼4 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (8%)
Health
An estimated 84% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Krimpenerwaard
Good self-rated health
84.1%
74.8%
Smokes
13%
15.1%
Excessive drinking
4.7%
5.1%
Overweight
48.6%
54.2%
Lonely
32.1%
41.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
36.2%
43.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.7%
42.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Traffic1.1%
Agriculture95%
Water3.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 2500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,500 m
–
GP practice
2,900 m
–
Primary school
3,100 m
–
Daycare
3,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Krimpenerwaard average.
Schoonouwen has 155 inhabitants (2026), or 42 per km² (89% lower than in Krimpenerwaard). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 16% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲8 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
60%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Married
50%
▲6 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲8 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
60%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (45%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 155.
Residents, 2026
155
+0% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 42 residents per km², this buurt is 89% less densely populated than the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Residents per km²42
Dwellings per km²14
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1530
15 to 2525
25 to 4530
45 to 6545
65 to 8020
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married65
Married75
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands150
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
60% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo140
Havo, vwo, mbo2-460
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Krimpenerwaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Krimpenerwaard voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 16% of the valid votes.
Municipality of KrimpenerwaardThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
14.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.4%
12.8%
CDA
13.8%
11.8%
JA21
8.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.3%
4.5%
BBB
3%
2.6%
Other
19.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Schoonouwen has an average of 1.4 cars per household. 14% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 8 percentage points less than in Krimpenerwaard (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲28 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (5%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (14%)
Cars per household (2024)
1.4
▲17% higher than Krimpenerwaard (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
24%
▲18 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲6 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€701,000
▲76% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲28 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (5%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (14%)
Cars per household (2024)
1.4
▲17% higher than Krimpenerwaard (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
14%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−1 pp
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
24%
▲18 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲6 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
18%
▼19 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€701,000
▲76% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 5 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca0
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
14% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard (2025).
Petrol85.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)14.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 15% to 14% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 70 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars70
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (24%).
Residential94.4%
Industrial24.1%
Other5.6%
Explanation
Based on 54 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
42 residents per km²: 92% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²42
NL 539▼ −92% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings18%
NL 37%▼ −51% vs NL
Average WOZ value€701,000
NL €398,000▲ +76% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings88%
NL 57%▲ +54% vs NL
Single-family dwellings82%
NL 63%▲ +30% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026