The average WOZ value in Benedenheul is €719,000, 74% higher than in Krimpenerwaard (€414,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 33%, against a rise of 40% in Krimpenerwaard. 89% of the homes are owner-occupied, 22 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€719,000
▲74% higher than Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲22 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲7 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼18 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
Built 1992–2005
15%
▲5 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (10%)
Average WOZ value
€719,000
▲74% higher than Krimpenerwaard (€414,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲22 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (67%)
Social housing
0%
▼26 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Private rent
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Single-family dwellings
86%
▲7 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (79%)
Built 1965–1974
5%
▼18 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (23%)
Built 1975–1991
9%
▼11 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (20%)
Built 1992–2005
15%
▲5 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 33% between 2021 and 2025, to €719,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€719,000▲ 74% above Krimpenerwaard
+33% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€478 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€478/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
235 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €719,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€157NL median
Property tax (OZB)€55€63
Water board levy€52–
Waste levy€26€27
Sewage levy€24€22
Costs to set aside€321
Maintenance reserve€300–
Buildings insurance€21–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Krimpenerwaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 94th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 235 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €719,000.
Levies: Krimpenerwaard's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Benedenheul has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Stolwijk.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €719,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Benedenheul
719,000
74
–
Stolwijk
408,000
1,633
–
Bovenkerk
641,000
88
–
Benedenkerk
645,000
107
–
Het Beijersche
660,000
121
–
Koolwijk
793,000
33
–
Schoonouwen
701,000
51
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 89% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied89%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
86% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes86%
Multi-family homes14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
45% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 18% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Before 194544.6%
1945-19648.1%
1965-19745.4%
1975-19919.5%
1992-200514.9%
2006-201513.5%
2016 and later4.1%
Explanation
Based on 74 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Benedenheul has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 2 crimes were registered, against 3 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
2
▼down from 3 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
2 crimes were registered in Benedenheul in 2025 (3 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
2
down from 3 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Benedenheul is 'Fraud and scams': 1 in 2025.
Fraud and scams1
Other and withheld1
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2022, police in Benedenheul registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2022
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2022
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Krimpenerwaard average; green space is below the Krimpenerwaard average.
An estimated 83% of adults in Benedenheul rate their own health as good, 8 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard. Fewer adults feel lonely (32% against 42%), fewer report anxiety or depression (35% against 44%), fewer are overweight (46% against 54%) and fewer smoke (11% against 15%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Benedenheul, covering 92% of the area, against 80% in Krimpenerwaard.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
83%
▲8 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼10 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼9 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Overweight
46%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲4 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
92%
▲12 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
83%
▲8 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (3%)
More figures
Lonely
32%
▼10 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
▼9 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Overweight
46%
▼8 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (54%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▲4 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
92%
▲12 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (80%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (7%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (2%)
Health
An estimated 83% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Krimpenerwaard
Good self-rated health
83.4%
74.8%
Smokes
11.3%
15.1%
Excessive drinking
4.7%
5.1%
Overweight
46.4%
54.2%
Lonely
32.2%
41.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
35%
43.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.5%
42.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Traffic0.4%
Agriculture92.3%
Water7.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 2600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,100 m
–
GP practice
3,600 m
–
Primary school
2,600 m
–
Daycare
2,600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Krimpenerwaard.
Benedenheul has 195 inhabitants (2026), or 46 per km² (88% lower than in Krimpenerwaard). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard was 84%, 6 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 16% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-7%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+3%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Married
53%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲11 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-7%
▼lower than Krimpenerwaard (+2%)
Turnout, municipality of Krimpenerwaard
84%
▲6 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+3%
=about the same as Krimpenerwaard (+3%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (26%)
Married
53%
▲9 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (44%)
Dutch origin
97%
▲11 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (86%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 7% between 2021 and 2026, to 195.
Residents, 2026
195
-7% since 2021
Krimpenerwaard +2%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 46 residents per km², this buurt is 88% less densely populated than the municipality of Krimpenerwaard.
Residents per km²46
Dwellings per km²17.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 23.8 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1530
15 to 2530
25 to 4525
45 to 6555
65 to 8040
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
53% of residents are married.
Never married80
Married100
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
97% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands185
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Krimpenerwaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 84% of eligible voters in Krimpenerwaard voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 16% of the valid votes.
Municipality of KrimpenerwaardThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
14.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.4%
12.8%
CDA
13.8%
11.8%
JA21
8.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.3%
4.5%
BBB
3%
2.6%
Other
19.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Benedenheul has an average of 1.3 cars per household, 8% higher than in Krimpenerwaard (1.2). 37% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 15 percentage points more than in Krimpenerwaard (22%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
25%
▲20 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
12%
▼12 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲8% higher than Krimpenerwaard (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
37%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+15 pp
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲16 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
14%
▼23 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€719,000
▲81% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
25%
▲20 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (5%)
Business services, share of businesses
12%
▼12 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than Krimpenerwaard (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.3
▲8% higher than Krimpenerwaard (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
37%
▲15 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (22%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+15 pp
▲higher than Krimpenerwaard (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
22%
▲16 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (6%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Krimpenerwaard (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲1 percentage point higher than Krimpenerwaard (88%)
Multi-family dwellings
14%
▼23 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€719,000
▲81% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
37% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 22% in the municipality of Krimpenerwaard (2025).
Petrol63.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)36.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 22% to 37% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 95 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars95
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (22%).
Residential89.2%
Industrial21.7%
Lodging2.4%
Other8.4%
Explanation
Based on 83 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
46 residents per km²: 91% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²46
NL 539▼ −91% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings14%
NL 37%▼ −62% vs NL
Average WOZ value€719,000
NL €398,000▲ +81% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings89%
NL 57%▲ +56% vs NL
Single-family dwellings86%
NL 63%▲ +37% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026