We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Kaag en Braassem
Living in Roelofarendsveen
The population is growing faster than in Kaag en Braassem. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem, and registered crime per resident is lower.
Homes cost less than the Kaag en Braassem average.
The average WOZ value in Roelofarendsveen is €472,000, 3% lower than in Kaag en Braassem (€487,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 89%, against a rise of 82% in Kaag en Braassem. 64% of the homes are owner-occupied, 2 percentage points less than in Kaag en Braassem (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€472,000
▼3% lower than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+89%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+82%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
64%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
74%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 2016 and later
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Built before 1945
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
Average WOZ value
€472,000
▼3% lower than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+89%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+82%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
64%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
74%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 2016 and later
20%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Built before 1945
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Built 1992–2005
9%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 89% between 2014 and 2025, to €472,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€472,000▼ 3% below Kaag en Braassem
+89% since 2014
Kaag en Braassem +82%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€321 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€321/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
130 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €472,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€143NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€35€41
Waste levy€32€27
Sewage levy€31€22
Costs to set aside€178
Maintenance reserve€166–
Buildings insurance€12–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Kaag en Braassem's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 240th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 130 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €472,000.
Levies: Kaag en Braassem's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Roelofarendsveen has the lowest WOZ value of the 5 wijken in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €472,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Roelofarendsveen
472,000
6,232
–
Overig Alkemade
531,000
1,591
–
Woubrugge
489,000
2,348
–
Rijnsaterwoude
514,000
552
–
Leimuiden
489,000
2,064
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 64% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied64%
Social housing29%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
74% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes74%
Multi-family homes26%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 28% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Before 19454.5%
1945-196411.5%
1965-197417.4%
1975-199127.5%
1992-20059%
2006-201510%
2016 and later20.1%
Explanation
Based on 6,301 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Kaag en Braassem average.
In 2025, 21 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Roelofarendsveen, 16% lower than in Kaag en Braassem (25). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 24%, against a fall of 18% in Kaag en Braassem. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼16% lower than Kaag en Braassem (25)
Change since 2021
-24%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼20% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.5)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
21
▼16% lower than Kaag en Braassem (25)
Change since 2021
-24%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.2
▼20% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.5)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Roelofarendsveen registered 21 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 25 in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Roelofarendsveen21
The municipality of Kaag en Braassem25
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Roelofarendsveen is 'Theft and burglary': 5.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 6.6 in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
RoelofarendsveenKaag en Braassem
Theft and burglary5.1
Kaag en Braassem 6.6▼ −23% vs Kaag en Braassem
Fraud and scams4.5
Kaag en Braassem 4.7≈ Kaag en Braassem
Traffic4.1
Kaag en Braassem 6.5▼ −37% vs Kaag en Braassem
Vandalism and public order4.0
Kaag en Braassem 3.1▲ +29% vs Kaag en Braassem
Violence and threats2.4
Kaag en Braassem 2.8▼ −14% vs Kaag en Braassem
Other and withheld0.8
Kaag en Braassem 0.8≈ Kaag en Braassem
Environmental0.2
Kaag en Braassem 0.3≈ Kaag en Braassem
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Roelofarendsveen registered 44 traffic accidents, of which 14 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is above the Kaag en Braassem average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Roelofarendsveen rate their own health as good, about the same as in Kaag en Braassem. Fewer adults are overweight (51% against 52%) and fewer meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 47%), but more report anxiety or depression (44% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Roelofarendsveen, covering 39% of the area, against 73% in Kaag en Braassem. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 5% of the area, 2 percentage points above the 3% in Kaag en Braassem.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (47%)
Overweight
51%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (52%)
Lonely
42%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
39%
▼34 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Built-up, share of the area
28%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Water, share of the area
22%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
5%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (47%)
Overweight
51%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (52%)
Lonely
42%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
39%
▼34 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Built-up, share of the area
28%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Water, share of the area
22%
▲10 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Kaag en Braassem
Good self-rated health
76%
76.4%
Smokes
14.5%
14.5%
Excessive drinking
6.2%
6.5%
Overweight
51.4%
51.9%
Lonely
42.4%
42%
Anxiety or depression feelings
44%
43.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.3%
46.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
5% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Traffic4.6%
Built-up27.8%
Other built-up1.3%
Recreation5.2%
Agriculture39%
Water22.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Kaag en Braassem average.
Roelofarendsveen has 14,435 inhabitants (2026), or 2,203 per km² (4.7 times as high as in Kaag en Braassem). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 25%, against a rise of 14% in Kaag en Braassem. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, VVD had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 14% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+25%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+14%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+29%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+19%)
Aged 25 to 45
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
83%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (45%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population growth since 2014
+25%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+14%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+29%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+19%)
Aged 25 to 45
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
83%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
45%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (45%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population per year
The population grew 25% between 2014 and 2026, to 14,435.
Residents, 2026
14,435
+25% since 2014
Kaag en Braassem +14%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 2,203 residents per km², this wijk is 4.7 times as densely populated as the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Residents per km²2,203
Dwellings per km²951.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 11.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 8.3 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
26% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 152,490
15 to 251,445
25 to 453,765
45 to 653,600
65 to 802,370
80 and over775
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married6,880
Married5,880
Divorced970
Widowed705
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
83% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands11,935
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)890
Outside Europe1,610
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
45% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo12,810
Havo, vwo, mbo2-44,740
Higher professional, university2,980
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kaag en Braassem; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Kaag en Braassem voted. The largest party was VVD with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Kaag en BraassemThe Netherlands
D66
16.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.2%
16.7%
VVD
19.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
7.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Roelofarendsveen has an average of 1.2 cars per household, about the same as in Kaag en Braassem (1.2). 20% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in Kaag en Braassem (21%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (6%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+8 pp
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (+8 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (4%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
26%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€472,000
▲19% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (6%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
20%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+8 pp
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (+8 pp)
Lodging, share of addresses
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (4%)
Industrial, share of addresses
7%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
84%
=about the same as Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
26%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€472,000
▲19% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 495 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij90
Nijverheid en energie300
Handel en horeca290
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie145
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed120
Zakelijke dienstverlening495
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg270
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten210
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
20% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2025).
Petrol80.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 20% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
20%▼ 1 percentage point below Kaag en Braassem (21%)
+8 pp since 2014
Kaag en Braassem +8 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 7,240 passenger cars and 645 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars7,240
Motorcycles645
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
84% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (7%).
Residential84.1%
Retail1.1%
Office1.2%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial7.3%
Lodging3.4%
Education0.1%
Sports0.1%
Other3.3%
Explanation
Based on 7,496 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2,203 residents per km²: 4.1 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²2,203
NL 539▲ +309% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings26%
NL 37%▼ −30% vs NL
Average WOZ value€472,000
NL €398,000▲ +19% vs NL
Single-family dwellings74%
NL 63%▲ +18% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026