We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Kaag en Braassem
Living in Roelofarendsveen-Noord
The population is growing slower than in Kaag en Braassem. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem, and registered crime per resident is lower.
Homes cost less than the Kaag en Braassem average.
The average WOZ value in Roelofarendsveen-Noord is €416,000, 15% lower than in Kaag en Braassem (€487,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 42%, against a rise of 40% in Kaag en Braassem. 52% of the homes are owner-occupied, 14 percentage points less than in Kaag en Braassem (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€416,000
▼15% lower than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
52%
▼14 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
42%
▲15 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
6%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 2016 and later
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Built 1992–2005
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (9%)
Average WOZ value
€416,000
▼15% lower than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+42%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
52%
▼14 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
42%
▲15 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
6%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
84%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 2016 and later
4%
▼10 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Built 1992–2005
1%
▼10 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
Built 2006–2015
18%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (9%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 42% between 2021 and 2025, to €416,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€416,000▼ 15% below Kaag en Braassem
+42% since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€295 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€295/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
116 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €416,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€137NL median
Water board levy€43–
Waste levy€32€27
Sewage levy€31€22
Property tax (OZB)€31€37
Costs to set aside€158
Maintenance reserve€148–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Kaag en Braassem's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 246th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 116 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €416,000.
Levies: Kaag en Braassem's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Roelofarendsveen-Noord has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Roelofarendsveen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €416,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Roelofarendsveen-Noord
416,000
1,591
–
Roelofarendsveen
524,000
2,282
–
Oude Wetering
452,000
1,234
–
Burgemeesterswijk
335,000
535
–
Tuinbouwgebied
591,000
590
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 52% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied52%
Social housing42%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
84% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes84%
Multi-family homes16%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
40% of dwellings were built between 1965 and 1974, against 18% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
1945-196412.6%
1965-197440.5%
1975-199123.7%
1992-20051.2%
2006-201518%
2016 and later4%
Explanation
Based on 1,593 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Kaag en Braassem average.
In 2025, 24 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Roelofarendsveen-Noord, 4% lower than in Kaag en Braassem (25). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 1%, against a fall of 18% in Kaag en Braassem. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
24
▼4% lower than Kaag en Braassem (25)
Change since 2021
-1%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.6
▼60% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.5)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
24
▼4% lower than Kaag en Braassem (25)
Change since 2021
-1%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (-18%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.6
▼60% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.5)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Roelofarendsveen-Noord registered 24 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 25 in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Roelofarendsveen-Noord24
The municipality of Kaag en Braassem25
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Roelofarendsveen-Noord is 'Vandalism and public order': 6.9 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 3.1 in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Roelofarendsveen-NoordKaag en Braassem
Vandalism and public order6.9
Kaag en Braassem 3.1▲ +123% vs Kaag en Braassem
Fraud and scams5.8
Kaag en Braassem 4.7▲ +23% vs Kaag en Braassem
Theft and burglary4.8
Kaag en Braassem 6.6▼ −27% vs Kaag en Braassem
Violence and threats4.2
Kaag en Braassem 2.8▲ +50% vs Kaag en Braassem
Traffic1.3
Kaag en Braassem 6.5▼ −80% vs Kaag en Braassem
Other and withheld0.8
Kaag en Braassem 0.8≈ Kaag en Braassem
Environmental0.3
Kaag en Braassem 0.3≈ Kaag en Braassem
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Roelofarendsveen-Noord registered 3 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Kaag en Braassem average; green space is above the Kaag en Braassem average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Roelofarendsveen-Noord rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in Kaag en Braassem. More adults are overweight (55% against 52%), more feel lonely (45% against 42%), more report anxiety or depression (46% against 43%) and more smoke (16% against 14%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Roelofarendsveen-Noord, covering 70% of the area, against 8% in Kaag en Braassem. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 23% of the area, 20 percentage points above the 3% in Kaag en Braassem.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
23%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
More figures
Lonely
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Overweight
55%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
2%
▼71 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Built-up, share of the area
70%
▲62 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Recreation, share of the area
23%
▲21 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
23%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
More figures
Lonely
45%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Overweight
55%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
45%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (47%)
Agriculture, share of the area
2%
▼71 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Built-up, share of the area
70%
▲62 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Recreation, share of the area
23%
▲21 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (2%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Kaag en Braassem
Good self-rated health
73.3%
76.4%
Smokes
15.9%
14.5%
Excessive drinking
4.9%
6.5%
Overweight
54.6%
51.9%
Lonely
44.8%
42%
Anxiety or depression feelings
46.1%
43.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.9%
46.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
23% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Traffic3.1%
Built-up70.3%
Recreation23.4%
Agriculture1.6%
Water1.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
500 m
–
Primary school
400 m
–
Daycare
900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1.4
GP practices
–
2.9
Daycares
–
0.7
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Kaag en Braassem average.
Roelofarendsveen-Noord has 3,745 inhabitants (2026), or 5,862 per km² (12.6 times as high as in Kaag en Braassem). Between 2021 and 2026 the population stayed about level, against a rise of 7% in Kaag en Braassem. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, VVD had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 14% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 25 to 45
23%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
47%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (45%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population growth since 2021
+0%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 25 to 45
23%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
47%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
82%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
46%
▲1 percentage point higher than Kaag en Braassem (45%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2021 and 2026, at 3,745.
Residents, 2026
3,745
+0% since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 5,862 residents per km², this buurt is 13 times as densely populated as the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Residents per km²5,862
Dwellings per km²2,485.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; 10.6 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
23% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15670
15 to 25440
25 to 45875
45 to 65870
65 to 80635
80 and over250
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are never married.
Never married1,750
Married1,555
Divorced235
Widowed195
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
82% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,065
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)175
Outside Europe505
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
46% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1830
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,220
Higher professional, university590
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kaag en Braassem; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Kaag en Braassem voted. The largest party was VVD with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Kaag en BraassemThe Netherlands
D66
16.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.2%
16.7%
VVD
19.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
7.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Roelofarendsveen-Noord has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 8% lower than in Kaag en Braassem (1.2). 15% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in Kaag en Braassem (21%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
21%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (13%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
15%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+5 pp
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
16%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
42%
▲14 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
21%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (13%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
1%
▼5 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (6%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (14%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Kaag en Braassem (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
15%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+5 pp
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
▲7 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼7 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Retail, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Kaag en Braassem (1%)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
16%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
42%
▲14 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 85 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie60
Handel en horeca40
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie25
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening85
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg75
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten45
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
15% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2025).
Petrol85.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)14.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 10% to 15% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
15%▼ 6 percentage points below Kaag en Braassem (21%)
+5 pp since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,750 passenger cars and 135 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,750
Motorcycles135
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (2%).
Residential91.4%
Retail0.1%
Office2%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial0.2%
Education0.1%
Sports0.3%
Other5.3%
Explanation
Based on 1,743 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5,862 residents per km²: 11 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²5,862
NL 539▲ +988% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings16%
NL 37%▼ −57% vs NL
Social housing42%
NL 28%▲ +50% vs NL
Single-family dwellings84%
NL 63%▲ +33% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026