Built between 1992 and 2005: 38%, against 11% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Key figures
Built 1992–2005
38%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
Built 1965–1974
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (18%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (9%)
Built 1992–2005
38%
▲27 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (11%)
Built 1965–1974
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (18%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (9%)
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Verspreide huizen Oost has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 6 crimes were registered, against 8 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
6
▼down from 8 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
6
▼down from 8 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
6 crimes were registered in Verspreide huizen Oost in 2025 (8 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
6
down from 8 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Verspreide huizen Oost is 'Traffic': 4 in 2025.
Traffic4
Vandalism and public order1
Environmental1
Theft and burglary0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Verspreide huizen Oost registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Kaag en Braassem average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Verspreide huizen Oost, covering 97% of the area, against 73% in Kaag en Braassem.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Agriculture, share of the area
97%
▲24 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Agriculture, share of the area
97%
▲24 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (73%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Traffic2.1%
Agriculture96.7%
Water1.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 2500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,600 m
–
GP practice
2,500 m
–
Primary school
3,000 m
–
Daycare
3,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Kaag en Braassem average.
Verspreide huizen Oost has 25 inhabitants (2026), or 6 per km² (99% lower than in Kaag en Braassem). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, VVD had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 14% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+25%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 25 to 45
67%
▲43 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
75%
▲29 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population growth since 2021
+25%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 25 to 45
67%
▲43 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (24%)
Never married
75%
▲29 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (46%)
Dutch origin
80%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population per year
The population grew 25% between 2021 and 2026, to 25.
Residents, 2026
25
+25% since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 6 residents per km², this buurt is 99% less densely populated than the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Residents per km²6
Dwellings per km²2.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
67% of residents are between 25 and 45.
25 to 4510
45 to 655
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
75% of residents are never married.
Never married15
Married5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
80% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands20
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kaag en Braassem; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Kaag en Braassem voted. The largest party was VVD with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Kaag en BraassemThe Netherlands
D66
16.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.2%
16.7%
VVD
19.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
7.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
0% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 21 percentage points less than in Kaag en Braassem (21%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
46%
▲39 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
62%
▼22 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
0%
▼21 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
0 pp
▼lower than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
46%
▲39 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Residential, share of addresses
62%
▼22 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
0% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2025).
Petrol100%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 0% to 0% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
0%▼ 21 percentage points below Kaag en Braassem (21%)
+0 pp since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 15 passenger cars and 0 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars15
Motorcycles0
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
62% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (46%).
Residential61.5%
Industrial46.2%
Other15.4%
Explanation
Based on 13 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
6 residents per km²: 99% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²6
NL 539▼ −99% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026