Homes cost more than the Kaag en Braassem average.
The average WOZ value in Bilderdam is €662,000, 36% higher than in Kaag en Braassem (€487,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 48%, against a rise of 40% in Kaag en Braassem. 80% of the homes are owner-occupied, 14 percentage points more than in Kaag en Braassem (66%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€662,000
▲36% higher than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲14 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
8%
▼19 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼16 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (28%)
Built before 1945
22%
▲15 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼14 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (18%)
Average WOZ value
€662,000
▲36% higher than Kaag en Braassem (€487,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+48%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+40%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲14 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (66%)
Social housing
8%
▼19 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (8%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲20 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (80%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼16 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (28%)
Built before 1945
22%
▲15 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼14 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (18%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 48% between 2021 and 2025, to €662,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€662,000▲ 36% above Kaag en Braassem
+48% since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +40%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€401 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€401/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
175 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €662,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€162NL median
Water board levy€50–
Property tax (OZB)€49€58
Waste levy€32€27
Sewage levy€31€22
Costs to set aside€239
Maintenance reserve€223–
Buildings insurance€16–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Kaag en Braassem's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 205th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 175 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €662,000.
Levies: Kaag en Braassem's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Bilderdam has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Leimuiden.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €662,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Bilderdam
662,000
50
–
Leimuiden
475,000
532
–
Vriezekoop
744,000
58
–
Uitbreiding West
426,000
594
–
Verspreide huizen Vriezekoopse polder
508,000
24
–
Verspreide huizen West
516,000
798
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 80% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied80%
Social housing8%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1945 and 1964, against 13% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Before 194522%
1945-196428%
1965-19744%
1975-199112%
1992-200512%
2006-20154%
2016 and later18%
Explanation
Based on 50 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Bilderdam has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 2 crimes were registered, against 2 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
2
=about the same as 2 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
2
=about the same as 2 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
2 crimes were registered in Bilderdam in 2025 (2 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
2
same as 2 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Bilderdam is 'Fraud and scams': 2 in 2025.
Fraud and scams2
Theft and burglary0
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Traffic0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Bilderdam registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Kaag en Braassem average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Bilderdam, covering 73% of the area, against 73% in Kaag en Braassem.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Traffic, share of the area
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Water, share of the area
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (2%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Traffic, share of the area
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (3%)
Water, share of the area
9%
▼3 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (12%)
Recreation, share of the area
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Kaag en Braassem (2%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 3% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Traffic9.1%
Built-up9.1%
Agriculture72.7%
Water9.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 2200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,700 m
–
GP practice
2,200 m
–
Primary school
2,600 m
–
Daycare
3,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Kaag en Braassem average.
Bilderdam has 115 inhabitants (2026), or 578 per km² (24% higher than in Kaag en Braassem). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, VVD had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 14% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+21%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Married
50%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Dutch origin
91%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population growth since 2021
+21%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Turnout, municipality of Kaag en Braassem
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+14%
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7%)
Aged 45 to 65
30%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (27%)
Married
50%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (42%)
Dutch origin
91%
▲8 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (83%)
VVD, share of the vote
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Population per year
The population grew 21% between 2021 and 2026, to 115.
Residents, 2026
115
+21% since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 578 residents per km², this buurt is 24% more densely populated than the municipality of Kaag en Braassem.
Residents per km²578
Dwellings per km²250
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 45.5 children were born per 1,000 residents; 45.5 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2515
25 to 4515
45 to 6535
65 to 8025
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married45
Married60
Divorced10
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
91% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands100
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Kaag en Braassem; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Kaag en Braassem voted. The largest party was VVD with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Kaag en BraassemThe Netherlands
D66
16.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.2%
16.7%
VVD
19.5%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
7.1%
12.8%
CDA
14.4%
11.8%
JA21
8.8%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
7.7%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points more than in Kaag en Braassem (21%).
Key figures
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+18 pp
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
16%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
7%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Average WOZ value
€662,000
▲66% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲4 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+18 pp
▲higher than Kaag en Braassem (+7 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
16%
▲9 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (7%)
Lodging, share of addresses
7%
▲3 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
▲2 percentage points higher than Kaag en Braassem (84%)
Average WOZ value
€662,000
▲66% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Passenger cars by fuel type
25% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Kaag en Braassem (2025).
Petrol75%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 7% to 25% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
25%▲ 4 percentage points above Kaag en Braassem (21%)
+18 pp since 2021
Kaag en Braassem +7 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 80 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars80
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (16%).
Residential86.2%
Office3.4%
Industrial15.5%
Lodging6.9%
Other1.7%
Explanation
Based on 58 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
8% social housing, against 28% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Social housing8%
NL 28%▼ −71% vs NL
Average WOZ value€662,000
NL €398,000▲ +66% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings80%
NL 57%▲ +40% vs NL
Private rent12%
NL 14%▼ −14% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025