The average WOZ value in Sint Annen is €395,000, 26% higher than in Groningen (€313,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 46%, against a rise of 39% in Groningen. 86% of the homes are owner-occupied, 45 percentage points more than in Groningen (41%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€395,000
▲26% higher than Groningen (€313,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+46%
▲higher than Groningen (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
86%
▲45 percentage points higher than Groningen (41%)
Social housing
3%
▼28 percentage points lower than Groningen (31%)
Private rent
12%
▼16 percentage points lower than Groningen (28%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲58 percentage points higher than Groningen (39%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼11 percentage points lower than Groningen (19%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼10 percentage points lower than Groningen (13%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Groningen (10%)
Average WOZ value
€395,000
▲26% higher than Groningen (€313,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+46%
▲higher than Groningen (+39%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
86%
▲45 percentage points higher than Groningen (41%)
Social housing
3%
▼28 percentage points lower than Groningen (31%)
Private rent
12%
▼16 percentage points lower than Groningen (28%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲58 percentage points higher than Groningen (39%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼11 percentage points lower than Groningen (19%)
Built 1945–1964
3%
▼10 percentage points lower than Groningen (13%)
Built 2016 and later
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Groningen (10%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 46% between 2021 and 2025, to €395,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€395,000▲ 26% above Groningen
+46% since 2021
Groningen +39%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€491 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€491/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
262 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €395,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€133NL median
Property tax (OZB)€54€35
Water board levy€43–
Waste levy€22€27
Sewage levy€14€22
Costs to set aside€358
Maintenance reserve€334–
Buildings insurance€24–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Groningen's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 225th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 262 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €395,000.
Levies: Groningen's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Sint Annen has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Ten Boer e.o..
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €395,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Sint Annen
395,000
77
–
Ten Boer Dorp
281,000
2,009
–
Buitengebied Ten Boer-Zuid
435,000
36
–
Garmerwolde
363,000
228
–
Thesinge
369,000
230
–
Buitengebied Ten Boer-Noord
200,000
39
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 86% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied86%
Social housing3%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
65% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 28% in the municipality of Groningen.
Before 194564.9%
1945-19642.6%
1965-19747.8%
1975-19917.8%
1992-20059.1%
2006-20155.2%
2016 and later2.6%
Explanation
Based on 77 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Sint Annen has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 3 crimes were registered, against 2 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
3
▲up from 2 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
3 crimes were registered in Sint Annen in 2025 (2 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
3
up from 2 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Sint Annen is 'Theft and burglary': 2 in 2025.
Theft and burglary2
Traffic1
Vandalism and public order0
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Sint Annen registered 7 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Groningen average; green space is below the Groningen average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Sint Annen rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points more than in Groningen. Fewer adults feel lonely (40% against 50%), fewer report anxiety or depression (42% against 50%) and fewer smoke (14% against 21%), but more are overweight (47% against 41%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Sint Annen, covering 96% of the area, against 52% in Groningen.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲4 percentage points higher than Groningen (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Groningen (14%)
More figures
Lonely
40%
▼10 percentage points lower than Groningen (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼8 percentage points lower than Groningen (50%)
Smokes
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Groningen (21%)
Overweight
47%
▲6 percentage points higher than Groningen (41%)
Agriculture, share of the area
96%
▲44 percentage points higher than Groningen (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼20 percentage points lower than Groningen (21%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Groningen (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲4 percentage points higher than Groningen (75%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Groningen (14%)
More figures
Lonely
40%
▼10 percentage points lower than Groningen (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼8 percentage points lower than Groningen (50%)
Smokes
14%
▼7 percentage points lower than Groningen (21%)
Overweight
47%
▲6 percentage points higher than Groningen (41%)
Agriculture, share of the area
96%
▲44 percentage points higher than Groningen (52%)
Built-up, share of the area
1%
▼20 percentage points lower than Groningen (21%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Groningen (8%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 75% in the municipality of Groningen (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Groningen
Good self-rated health
79.2%
74.7%
Smokes
14.5%
21.4%
Excessive drinking
5.4%
7.5%
Overweight
47.2%
41.2%
Lonely
40.3%
49.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.3%
50.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
52.2%
57.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 14% in the municipality of Groningen.
Traffic2.8%
Built-up1.3%
Agriculture95.7%
Water0.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 3100 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,300 m
–
GP practice
3,500 m
–
Primary school
3,100 m
–
Daycare
3,900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Groningen.
Sint Annen has 165 inhabitants (2026), or 36 per km² (97% lower than in Groningen). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Groningen was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 24% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-11%
▼lower than Groningen (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Groningen
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Groningen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲13 percentage points higher than Groningen (20%)
Married
48%
▲25 percentage points higher than Groningen (23%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲24 percentage points higher than Groningen (70%)
D66, share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-11%
▼lower than Groningen (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Groningen
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
▼lower than Groningen (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲13 percentage points higher than Groningen (20%)
Married
48%
▲25 percentage points higher than Groningen (23%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲24 percentage points higher than Groningen (70%)
D66, share of the vote
24%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 11% between 2021 and 2026, to 165.
Residents, 2026
165
-11% since 2021
Groningen +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 36 residents per km², this buurt is 97% less densely populated than the municipality of Groningen.
Residents per km²36
Dwellings per km²16.7
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2525
25 to 4525
45 to 6555
65 to 8035
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are married.
Never married65
Married80
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands155
Outside Europe10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Groningen; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Groningen voted. The largest party was D66 with 24% of the valid votes.
Municipality of GroningenThe Netherlands
D66
24.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
8.4%
16.7%
VVD
10.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
24%
12.8%
CDA
8.6%
11.8%
JA21
3.5%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3%
4.5%
BBB
1.2%
2.6%
Other
16.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Sint Annen has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 71% higher than in Groningen (0.7). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points less than in Groningen (29%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
29%
▲28 percentage points higher than Groningen (1%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Groningen (15%)
Business services, share of businesses
14%
▼13 percentage points lower than Groningen (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲71% higher than Groningen (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▼1 percentage point lower than Groningen (29%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Groningen (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲12 percentage points higher than Groningen (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲3 percentage points higher than Groningen (89%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Groningen (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
3%
▼34 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
29%
▲28 percentage points higher than Groningen (1%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼15 percentage points lower than Groningen (15%)
Business services, share of businesses
14%
▼13 percentage points lower than Groningen (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲71% higher than Groningen (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▼1 percentage point lower than Groningen (29%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
▲higher than Groningen (+5 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
14%
▲12 percentage points higher than Groningen (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
92%
▲3 percentage points higher than Groningen (89%)
Lodging, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Groningen (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
3%
▼34 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
3%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
28% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 29% in the municipality of Groningen (2025).
Petrol72.2%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)27.8%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 20% to 28% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
28%▼ 1 percentage point below Groningen (29%)
+8 pp since 2021
Groningen +5 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 95 passenger cars and 20 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars95
Motorcycles20
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
92% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (14%).
Residential91.7%
Assembly2.4%
Industrial14.3%
Lodging2.4%
Other3.6%
Explanation
Based on 84 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
36 residents per km²: 93% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²36
NL 539▼ −93% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Social housing3%
NL 28%▼ −89% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings86%
NL 57%▲ +51% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026