Loading area…
Area page in progress
We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Albrandswaard. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Albrandswaard.
45 residents,
Get a full report on value, costs, energy and surroundings.
Compared with the municipality of Albrandswaard · newest year available
© Kadaster / PDOK, CBS
The average WOZ value in Poortugaal is €578,000, 27% higher than in Albrandswaard (€456,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 39%, against a rise of 37% in Albrandswaard. 96% of the homes are owner-occupied, 26 percentage points more than in Albrandswaard (70%).
The average WOZ value rose 39% between 2021 and 2025, to €578,000.
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€336 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Albrandswaard's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 256th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Poortugaal has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Poortugaal-Noord.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Here: €578,000 average WOZ value.
| Value | Dwellings | Aged 65+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poortugaal | 578,000 | 24 | – |
| Valckesteyn | 480,000 | 914 | – |
| Zwaardijk-Kruisdijk | 388,000 | 47 | – |
| Buitengebied Poortugaal | 658,000 | 54 | – |
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 96% of dwellings.
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
67% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 7% in the municipality of Albrandswaard.
Based on 24 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Poortugaal has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 0 crimes were registered, against 1 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
0 crimes were registered in Poortugaal in 2025 (1 in 2021).
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
Source: CBS/Politie geregistreerde misdrijven (47018NED) 2025
Built-up land is the largest land use in Poortugaal, covering 40% of the area, against 22% in Albrandswaard. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 20% of the area, 2 percentage points above the 18% in Albrandswaard.
20% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 18% in the municipality of Albrandswaard.
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 600 m.
| Distance | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Large supermarket | 1,600 m | – |
| GP practice | 1,200 m | – |
| Primary school | 800 m | – |
| Daycare | 600 m | – |
| Large supermarkets | – | 0 |
| GP practices | – | 0 |
| Daycares | – | 1 |
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
Poortugaal has 45 inhabitants (2026), or 1,280 per km² (4% higher than in Albrandswaard). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Albrandswaard was 80%, 2 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, VVD had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 14% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
The population shrank 10% between 2021 and 2026, to 45.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
With 1,280 residents per km², this buurt is 4% more densely populated than the municipality of Albrandswaard.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
44% of residents are between 45 and 65.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
60% of residents are married.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
90% of residents have Dutch origin.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
These figures are for the whole municipality of Albrandswaard; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 80% of eligible voters in Albrandswaard voted. The largest party was VVD with 19% of the valid votes.
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
17% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points less than in Albrandswaard (26%).
17% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Albrandswaard (2025).
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 17% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
In 2025, 30 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
96% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (8%).
Based on 25 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
4% private rent, against 14% nationally.
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
| Buitengebied Poortugaal | 115 | €658,000 | – |
| Valckesteyn | 2,390 | €480,000 | 16 |
| Zwaardijk-Kruisdijk | 100 | €388,000 | – |