We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Address and locationPDOK Locatieserver
Building and year builtKadaster BAG
WOZ valueWOZ-waardeloket
Energy labelEP-Online (RVO)
Neighbourhood and residentsCBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Schools and amenitiesDUO · OpenStreetMap
Climate and environmentRIVM · Klimaateffectatlas
Putting the report togetherScores and comparisons
Westerdijk 4-0415, Utrecht for sale: check the price
Photo via Funda
Listed on Funda since 15 Sept 2026
Westerdijk 4-0415
3513EW Utrecht · Pijlsweerd-Zuid
Asking price
€250,000
€8,621 per m²
Our estimate
€279,382
Likely €244k – €320k
WOZ value 2025
€258,000
+126% since 2014
The asking price is €250,000. Our estimate is €279,382, likely between €244,034 and €319,849.
€244k€320k
asking price
our estimate
likely range (4 in 5 similar homes)
Within the range. The asking price falls within our modelled value band for this address. 76% of the homes sold in Utrecht in Q3 2026 went for more than the asking price.
Each theme scores from 0 to 100, with a letter from A to E. Higher is always better for the buyer — so on Costs, a low score means expensive. The overall figure is the average of the theme scores, not a ranking.
Total monthly costs (excluding mortgage) € 258 — ± € 258 / month, made up of: OZB, sewerage, waste collection, water authority charges, energy, maintenance reserve, buildings insurance. · Costs
GP practice 252 m — Very close · Amenities & schools
Average income per inhabitant € 48,300 — Very high average income · Residents
Property tax (OZB) — € 20 / month · Costs
Supermarket 242 m — Close · Amenities & schools
Water authority charges — € 39 / month · Costs
Flood probability — Does not flood · Environment
Secondary school 522 m — Close · Amenities & schools
Daycare centre 215 m — Close · Amenities & schools
Build year 2013 — Built under the Bouwbesluit (EPC era) · House
Air quality: particulate matter (PM10) 17.0 µg/m³ — Clean air · Environment
Air quality: nitrogen dioxide (NO2) 20.0 µg/m³ — Clean air · Environment
!What to look into· 11
Cooling down outdoors in hot weather 29.0% — Higher than 1% of neighbourhoods · Environment
Cooling down indoors in hot weather 32.7% — Higher than 1% of neighbourhoods · Environment
Satisfied with the green nearby 59.0% — Higher than 1% of neighbourhoods · Amenities & schools
Floor area 30 m² — Very low · House
Serious noise annoyance from road traffic 11.4% — Higher than 90% of neighbourhoods · Environment
Satisfied with their home 85.1% — Higher than 16% of neighbourhoods · Residents
Crimes per 1,000 residents 66.6 per 1,000 — Higher than 81% of neighbourhoods · Crime
Satisfied with their surroundings 86.0% — Higher than 21% of neighbourhoods · Residents
Serious noise annoyance from neighbours 6.2% — Higher than 79% of neighbourhoods · Residents
Road traffic noise (Lden) 61 dB — Noisy · Environment
All-source noise (Lden) 61 dB — Noisy · Environment
00Compare
Next to another address.
Put this address beside where you live now, or another house you're considering, and see item by item what differs.
Add your current address, or another house you're considering, to see what differs.
00Price
What this address is worth.
The municipality's WOZ value and a modelled estimate of the market value, with how that WOZ value has moved over the years. A WOZ value is not a market price.
Estimated market value
Estimated market value
A statistical estimate, not a valuation. The model starts from this dwelling's official WOZ value and corrects it with CBS figures: the gap between WOZ values and actual sale prices in this municipality, how the housing market has moved since, and how this dwelling compares per m² with what is typical for this neighbourhood. Each of those steps carries its own uncertainty, and the model carries it through — which is why the figure comes with a range rather than a single hard number. Condition, renovations and interior quality appear in no source, and so are not in this estimate either.
4 out of 5 homes like this one sell within this range.
Asking price
€250,000
Within the range
The asking price falls within our modelled value band for this address.
The market in Utrecht
Figures from NVM estate agents for Q3 2026
Sale price per m²
€5,614/m²
Of the homes sold in Utrecht in Q3 2026, half went for more than €5,614 per m² of living area and half for less. All dwelling types combined.
Asking vs sale price
+6.1%
The final sale price in Utrecht came in 6.1% above the last asking price. Budget for that.
Sold above asking
76%
76% of the homes sold in Utrecht in Q3 2026 went for more than the asking price.
Sale price per m² by dwelling type
Terraced house
€5,049/m²
End-of-terrace house
€5,194/m²
Semi-detached house
€5,524/m²
Detached house
€6,192/m²
Apartment
€6,135/m²
Figures from NVM estate agents covering existing owner-occupied homes in COROP region Utrecht, Q3 2026. A region spans dozens of municipalities, so this describes the surrounding market, not this street or this house.
WOZ value, 2014 – 2025
From €114,000 to €258,000
€100k
€150k
€200k
€250k
€300k
€258,000
20142025
WOZ value by reference date
Reference date
WOZ value
1 January 2014
€114,000
1 January 2015
€113,000
1 January 2016
€127,000
1 January 2017
€136,000
1 January 2018
€150,000
1 January 2019
€159,000
1 January 2020
€195,000
1 January 2021
€228,000
1 January 2022
€265,000
1 January 2023
€260,000
1 January 2024
€243,000
1 January 2025
€258,000
00House
The building and its condition.
C
44/100
Floor area
30 m²
Attention
Floor area
The usable floor area of the dwelling, as registered in the BAG.
The building's construction year, as registered in the BAG. The bands follow the building requirements in force at the time: no insulation requirements (before 1976), the first insulation requirements (1976-1991), the Bouwbesluit with EPC (1992-2020) and BENG (2021 onwards). So it says what was required then — not how this building performs now, which may have been improved since.
For a dwelling built in 2013, this build-year overview has no known points of attention — this is not a substitute for a building survey.
Build-year points of attention
An overview of build-year-related points to raise during the building survey — not a finding of defects in this specific dwelling, and not a substitute for a survey.
Original value
For a dwelling built in 2013, this build-year overview has no known points of attention — this is not a substitute for a building survey.
Source
HuisWeter-bouwjaar-checklist (Milieu Centraal, RIVM, Instituut Asbestslachtoffers, vakliteratuur bouwkundige keuring)
Retrieved on 8 September 2026 · No open licence (source cited for context)
This dwelling's officially registered energy label, from A++++ (very efficient) to G (very inefficient). See the rows below for its validity and whether it is based on an assessment of this specific dwelling.
Original value
A
Sits at the 40.9th percentile.
Method
Officially registered energy label (EP-Online, RVO). A periodic certificate, not a live measurement of actual current energy use — see the rows below for this label's basis and validity.
The energy label's registration and expiry date. An expired label is still informative about the dwelling, but may no longer reflect its current situation.
The dwelling's own monthly costs: municipal levies, water authority charges, energy, maintenance and insurance. No mortgage.
A
88/100
Total monthly costs (excluding mortgage)
€ 258± € 258 / month, made up of: OZB, sewerage, waste collection, water authority charges, energy, maintenance reserve, buildings insurance.
Plus
Total monthly costs (excluding mortgage)
The sum of the house-intrinsic monthly costs above: municipal levies, water authority charges, energy, maintenance reserve and buildings insurance. NO mortgage: that depends on the buyer (deposit, rate, term), not the house, and is deliberately excluded here.
Original value
€ 258
Higher than 0% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Source
HuisWeter-model: som van de woninggebonden maandlasten
Retrieved on 8 September 2026 · No open licence (source cited for context)
The municipal property tax for owners, estimated as an average effective rate for this gemeente (total OZB revenue from dwellings divided by the total WOZ value of the housing stock) applied to this dwelling's own WOZ value.
The municipal sewerage charge, estimated as the average amount per household in this gemeente (total sewerage revenue divided by the number of households).
The municipal waste collection charge, estimated as the average amount per household in this gemeente (total revenue divided by the number of households).
The water authority charges (watersysteemheffing and zuiveringsheffing). This product does not know this specific address's own water authority, so this is the NATIONAL AVERAGE rate across all 21 Dutch water authorities, not your own authority's actual rate.
Estimated energy use: the average gas and electricity use of this type of dwelling (flat, terraced, end-of-terrace, semi-detached or detached) in this gemeente, according to CBS, at current national-average energy tariffs. The type comes from the energy label; without one it is the average over every dwelling in the gemeente. An average, not a bill.
Original value
€ 104 / month
Method
Average use of a flat in Utrecht in 2025 (CBS 81528NED), at the national-average tariff of August 2026 (CBS 85592NED). Gas 340 m³ = € 830/year. Electricity 1,770 kWh, after the fixed tax reduction = € 419/year.
An average for this type of dwelling, not a bill: household size, a heat pump or an electric car make a big difference.
Maintenance reserve
€ 38 / month
Plus
Maintenance reserve
A recommended monthly maintenance reserve, estimated as 0.85%/year of the rebuild value (floor area x an assumed rebuild cost per m²). This is a rule-of-thumb figure, not a measured one.
Original value
€ 38 / month
Higher than 0% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Source
HuisWeter-model: onderhoudsreserve (0,85%/jaar van aangenomen herbouwwaarde)
Retrieved on 8 September 2026 · No open licence (source cited for context)
The verdict on water authority charges follows directly from the WOZ value; the ranking is the WOZ value's, not separate evidence. The verdict on maintenance reserve and buildings insurance follows directly from the floor area; the ranking is the floor area's, not separate evidence.
00Residents
Who lives around here.
D
38/100
Average income per inhabitant
€ 48,300
25%
higher than in Utrecht
€ 38,500
38%
higher than in the Netherlands
€ 34,900
Plus
Average income per inhabitant
The average personal income per inhabitant in this neighbourhood, calculated over the entire population in private households (including residents without their own income). A characteristic of the neighbourhood, not of this specific dwelling or the people who live there now.
Figures from 2024 · Ranked among neighbourhoods of 2,500+ residents; CBS does not publish this figure for smaller ones.
Population density
15,326 / km²
×3.8
as high as in Utrecht
4,018 / km²
×29
as high as in the Netherlands
536 / km²
Population density
The number of residents per square kilometre of land area in this neighbourhood. This reflects how urban or rural the surroundings feel — not a quality judgement, more a matter of taste.
The average number of addresses per square kilometre within a 1 km radius of each address in the neighbourhood — the measure CBS uses to classify urbanity. Like population density, this is informational, not a quality judgement.
The average number of people per household in this neighbourhood, as CBS publishes it. A low figure points to many single people or couples, a higher one to more families. A characteristic of the area, not a quality judgement.
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who say they are satisfied with their own home. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole, not a verdict on this dwelling and not a count of residents.
Why does it matter?
How satisfied residents are with their homes says something about how well the housing in the area fits what people are looking for.
Original value
85.1%
Higher than 16.5% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Satisfied with their surroundings
86.0%
1.4 pp
higher than in Utrecht
84.6%
0.9 pp
similar to the Netherlands
86.9%
Attention
Satisfied with their surroundings
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who say they are satisfied with their surroundings. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole, not a count of residents.
Why does it matter?
This is how residents themselves experience the area: atmosphere, amenities and quiet together. It complements the measured figures with the view of the people who live there.
Original value
86.0%
Higher than 20.7% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Serious noise annoyance from neighbours
6.2%
0.0 pp
similar to Utrecht
6.2%
0.7 pp
similar to the Netherlands
5.5%
Attention
Serious noise annoyance from neighbours
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are seriously annoyed by noise from neighbours. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole, not a count of residents.
Why does it matter?
Noise from neighbours depends mostly on construction (sound insulation between homes) and how closely people live together. We cannot measure it at the address itself.
Original value
6.2%
Higher than 79.2% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
5.4% sleep badly because of it (Utrecht 4.7%, the Netherlands 3.6%) · RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Gets support from others
94.9%
1.8 pp
higher than in Utrecht
93.1%
2.0 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
92.9%
18–64
95.1%
1.9 pp higher than in Utrecht 93.2%
65+
92.0%
0.6 pp similar to Utrecht 92.6%
Gets support from others
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who get support from others when needed. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Support from others shows how strong the social ties in a neighbourhood are.
Original value
94.9%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Struggles to make ends meet
18.9%
0.5 pp
similar to Utrecht
18.4%
3.6 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
15.3%
18–64
19.3%
0.3 pp similar to Utrecht 19.6%
65+
14.0%
3.6 pp higher than in Utrecht 10.4%
Struggles to make ends meet
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who struggle to make ends meet. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It describes the financial position of residents and gives context to the costs and prices in the area.
Original value
18.9%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Informal carer
6.9%
3.4 pp
lower than in Utrecht
10.3%
6.8 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
13.7%
18–64
6.4%
3.2 pp lower than in Utrecht 9.6%
65+
13.8%
1.6 pp lower than in Utrecht 15.4%
Informal carer
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who provide informal care. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Informal care shows how many residents look after someone else besides their own lives.
Original value
6.9%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Volunteering
19.3%
3.2 pp
lower than in Utrecht
22.5%
5.4 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
24.7%
18–64
18.8%
2.9 pp lower than in Utrecht 21.7%
65+
26.1%
1.7 pp lower than in Utrecht 27.8%
Volunteering
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who do volunteer work. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Volunteering is a sign of how active residents are in their area.
Original value
19.3%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Who lives here
Pijlsweerd-Zuid · 4,570 residents
edition 2026
Residents by age group
0–15
8%
15–25
14%
25–45
56%
45–65
15%
65–80
5%
80+
1%
Households
Living alone1,730
59.8%
No children805
27.8%
With children360
12.4%
Average household size: 1.6
Marital status
Never married3,555
77.8%
Married760
16.6%
Divorced195
4.3%
Widowed60
1.3%
Counts every resident, children included; children count as never married.
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
Primary, vmbo, mbo1460
10.8%
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4810
19.0%
Higher professional, university2,990
70.2%
Pupils and students
Primary school160
20.3%
Secondary school100
12.7%
Vocational (mbo)30
3.8%
Higher professional (hbo)170
21.5%
University (wo)330
41.8%
Residents by country of origin
Netherlands2,865
62.6%
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)695
15.2%
Outside Europe1,015
22.2%
Residents by country of origin
Residents by country of origin
Country of origin
2023
2024
2025
2026
Change
Netherlands
65.3% (3,075)
64.0% (3,035)
63.2% (2,965)
62.6% (2,865)
−2.7 pp
Outside Europe
20.8% (980)
20.6% (975)
21.7% (1,020)
22.2% (1,015)
+1.4 pp
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)
13.9% (655)
15.4% (730)
15.1% (710)
15.2% (695)
+1.3 pp
The series starts in 2023: CBS changed to the country-of-origin classification then. Earlier figures use a different classification and cannot be compared with these.
Figures from CBS Kerncijfers Wijken en Buurten for the buurt Pijlsweerd-Zuid (4,570 residents). Percentages are calculated over the sum of the categories shown, not over the total population: CBS rounds every count to a multiple of five, so the two need not be equal. Not every block comes from the same edition; each block states which edition it comes from. A published 0 means 0, 1 or 2 residents, not 'none'. Every figure describes the neighbourhood as a whole, not a street, a household or a person. Editions read: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB), edities 2021-2026
00Crime
What is registered in the area.
E
19/100
Crimes per 1,000 residents
Pijlsweerd-Zuid · 2025
66.6per 1,000 residents
+5% registered crimes since 2019
Higher than 81% of neighbourhoods in the Netherlands (median 27.1)
The number of registered crimes per 1,000 residents, across the NEIGHBOURHOOD this address is in (not the municipality) — the finest breakdown police/CBS publish for registered crime. The figure is ranked against every other Dutch neighbourhood: half of them sit below 27 crimes per 1,000 residents, a quarter above 52. This describes an area as a whole, not this specific address or the people living there.
Original value
66.6 per 1,000
Higher than 81% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
The buurt (neighbourhood) Pijlsweerd-Zuid (not the municipality or street) — the finest breakdown police/CBS publish for registered crime. 313 registered crimes in 2025 divided by 4,700 residents, times 1,000.
Crimes are counted where they happen, not where those involved live: a buurt with shops, nightlife or a station also counts offences against people who do not live there. CBS does not publish four crime types at buurt level (sexual offences among them); these are included in the total and in the 'other and withheld' category, but cannot be shown separately.
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents per year
Pijlsweerd-Zuid, 2019–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents per year in Pijlsweerd-Zuid
Year
Per 1,000 residents
Number of crimes
2019
63.6
299
2020
63.8
300
2021
51.5
242
2022
53.0
249
2023
60.4
284
2024
56.6
266
2025
66.6
313
Crimes per 1,000 residents
Pijlsweerd-Zuid, 2025
Higher than UtrechtLower than UtrechtPijlsweerd-ZuidGemeente Utrecht (average)
Registered crimes by category in Pijlsweerd-Zuid, per 1,000 residents and as a count
Category
Per 1,000
Count
Gemeente Utrecht, per 1,000
Theft and burglary
43.4
204
44.3
Vandalism and public order
8.7
41
7.4
Violence and threats
3.2
15
5.4
Fraud and scams
4.3
20
4.7
Traffic
6.4
30
8.5
Environmental
0.0
0
0.2
Other and withheld
0.6
3
2.6
Home burglaries
3.4per 1,000 homes per year
25 home burglaries in 2023–2025
Higher than 70% of neighbourhoods in the Netherlands (median 2.0)
13% higher than Utrecht as a whole (3.0)
Home burglaries
The number of registered home burglaries per year per 1,000 homes in the NEIGHBOURHOOD this address is in, averaged over the last three published years — a single year is too small in one neighbourhood to compare on. The figure is ranked against every other Dutch neighbourhood: half sit below 2.0 per 1,000 homes, a quarter above 3.9, and a quarter registered no home burglary at all in three years. Home burglaries are also part of the total above, so this figure does not count separately towards the score. It describes an area, not this address.
The buurt (neighbourhood) of Pijlsweerd-Zuid — not the street or the address — from CBS/Politie 47018NED. The trend shows registered crimes per 1,000 residents per year over the last 7 published years. Every year is divided by the same population (4,700), because no matching population figure is available for earlier years: the line therefore shows how recorded crime moved, not how crime per resident moved. The breakdown by type covers 2025, divided by 4,700 residents, times 1,000. The 'other and withheld' category is the published total minus the summed categories, so the bars add up to the total exactly. The comparison figure is the gemeente (municipality) of Utrecht as a whole in the same year, from the same table and the same grouping of crime types, divided by 376,757 residents.
Source: CBS/Politie: Geregistreerde misdrijven; soort misdrijf, wijk, buurt (47018NED)
00Health
How healthy residents say they are.
How the adults in this neighbourhood experience their health and their lives, according to RIVM's Gezondheidsmonitor, and how far the nearest GP, pharmacy, dentist, physiotherapist and hospital are from this address. Without a score and not counted in the overall grade.
Good self-rated health
81.3%
5.2 pp
higher than in Utrecht
76.1%
8.5 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
72.8%
18–64
82.8%
4.4 pp higher than in Utrecht 78.4%
65+
60.6%
0.4 pp similar to Utrecht 61.0%
Good self-rated health
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who rate their own health as good. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It gives a picture of the neighbourhood's population, for instance how old and how vulnerable it is on average. It says nothing about this dwelling.
Original value
81.3%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Long-term condition
26.2%
4.4 pp
lower than in Utrecht
30.6%
8.7 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
34.9%
18–64
24.4%
3.2 pp lower than in Utrecht 27.6%
65+
50.9%
0.2 pp similar to Utrecht 50.7%
Long-term condition
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who have one or more long-term conditions. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
A high share can go with an older population. It is a characteristic of the residents, not a quality of the area.
Original value
26.2%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Smokes
23.2%
4.3 pp
higher than in Utrecht
18.9%
6.0 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
17.2%
18–64
24.0%
3.9 pp higher than in Utrecht 20.1%
65+
13.3%
2.1 pp higher than in Utrecht 11.2%
Smokes
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who smoke tobacco. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It describes the residents' lifestyle, which goes with their age and income. It says nothing about this dwelling.
Original value
23.2%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Excessive drinking
9.4%
3.1 pp
higher than in Utrecht
6.3%
3.6 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
5.8%
18–64
9.3%
3.2 pp higher than in Utrecht 6.1%
65+
9.8%
2.2 pp higher than in Utrecht 7.6%
Excessive drinking
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who drink more alcohol than the alcohol guideline advises. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It describes the residents' lifestyle, not a quality of the area.
Original value
9.4%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Overweight
30.8%
8.5 pp
lower than in Utrecht
39.3%
20.8 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
51.6%
18–64
29.2%
8.0 pp lower than in Utrecht 37.2%
65+
52.9%
0.4 pp similar to Utrecht 53.3%
Overweight
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are overweight. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Being overweight is more common among older residents; the figures per age group below show whether the age mix makes the difference.
Original value
30.8%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Anxiety or depression feelings
55.9%
2.5 pp
higher than in Utrecht
53.4%
8.6 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
47.3%
18–64
56.6%
1.6 pp higher than in Utrecht 55.0%
65+
45.1%
2.0 pp higher than in Utrecht 43.1%
Anxiety or depression feelings
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who had feelings of anxiety or depression in the last four weeks. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It gives a picture of the residents' mental wellbeing as a group. It says nothing about any resident or about this dwelling.
Original value
55.9%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Meets physical activity guideline
62.8%
6.1 pp
higher than in Utrecht
56.7%
14.5 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
48.3%
18–64
64.4%
5.3 pp higher than in Utrecht 59.1%
65+
40.2%
0.4 pp similar to Utrecht 40.6%
Meets physical activity guideline
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who meet the Health Council's physical activity guideline. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
How many residents move enough goes with their age, and partly with the room to walk, cycle and play sport.
Original value
62.8%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Lonely
42.6%
4.6 pp
lower than in Utrecht
47.2%
4.6 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
47.2%
18–64
42.0%
4.8 pp lower than in Utrecht 46.8%
65+
51.6%
1.8 pp higher than in Utrecht 49.8%
Lonely
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who feel lonely. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Loneliness occurs in every neighbourhood. The figure shows how connected residents feel on average.
Original value
42.6%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Severely lonely
12.1%
2.1 pp
lower than in Utrecht
14.2%
1.5 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
13.6%
18–64
12.0%
2.5 pp lower than in Utrecht 14.5%
65+
13.2%
1.2 pp higher than in Utrecht 12.0%
Severely lonely
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who feel severely lonely. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
Severe loneliness is the heavier form of the figure above.
Original value
12.1%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Control over their own life
91.5%
2.8 pp
higher than in Utrecht
88.7%
3.9 pp
higher than in the Netherlands
87.6%
18–64
92.0%
2.6 pp higher than in Utrecht 89.4%
65+
84.5%
0.6 pp similar to Utrecht 83.9%
Control over their own life
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who feel moderate to high control over their own life. An RIVM estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole: a characteristic of the area, not a statement about any resident or household.
Why does it matter?
It says something about how self-reliant residents feel. It is a characteristic of the population, not a quality of the area.
Original value
91.5%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Care near this address
Straight-line distance to the nearest, and how many are within reach. No verdict.
GP practice
Huisartsenpraktijk Weerdsingel
7 within 1 km
252 m
GP practice
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest GP practice, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average: the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the name, and how many lie within 1 km of this address. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped location will be missing, and nothing here says whether it is taking new patients. No verdict is given.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest pharmacy, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average: the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the name, and how many lie within 1 km of this address. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped location will be missing, and nothing here says whether it is taking new patients. No verdict is given.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest dental practice, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average: the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the name, and how many lie within 1 km of this address. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped location will be missing, and nothing here says whether it is taking new patients. No verdict is given.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest physiotherapy practice, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average: the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the name, and how many lie within 1 km of this address. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped location will be missing, and nothing here says whether it is taking new patients. No verdict is given.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest hospital, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average: the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the name, and how many lie within 5 km of this address. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped location will be missing, and nothing here says whether it is taking new patients. No verdict is given. OpenStreetMap also counts specialist and psychiatric hospitals here, and a hospital made up of several buildings counts as one when they share a name and lie within 500 m of each other. It says nothing about which departments there are, or whether there is an emergency department.
How far it is to the nearest supermarket, GP, school and daycare centre, and how many are close by. Measured straight-line from this address, according to OpenStreetMap.
A
80/100
Longer bar = better than elsewhere in the Netherlands
Supermarket
Albert Heijn
5 within 500 m
242 m
Supermarket
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest supermarket, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped supermarket will be missing. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). The distance is compared with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS), after converting straight-line to road.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest GP practice, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a newly opened or not-yet-mapped practice will be missing. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). The distance is compared with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS), after converting straight-line to road.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest primary school, wherever it is, according to DUO's school register — every school location in the country is in it. Special education is not counted here. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). The distance is compared with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS), after converting straight-line to road.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest secondary school, wherever it is, according to DUO's school register — every school location in the country is in it. Special education is not counted here. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). The distance is compared with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS), after converting straight-line to road.
52 primary schools and 20 secondary schools within 3 km — as the crow flies
Daycare centre
KiKeBOO 1 B.V.
4 within 500 m
215 m
Daycare centre
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest registered daycare centre, wherever it is, according to the Landelijk Register Kinderopvang — the national register every daycare centre must be in before it may open. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). The distance is compared with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS), after converting straight-line to road.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest playground, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. OpenStreetMap is volunteer-maintained; a not-yet-mapped playground will be missing. Beneath it: how many lie within 500 m of this address, or within 1 km when there are none within 500 m (left out when there are none). No verdict is given: CBS publishes no playground distance to compare it with.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest train station, wherever it is, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking or cycling route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor is it a neighbourhood average — the measurement starts at this front door. Beneath it: the station's name and how many stations lie within 500 m or 1 km. No verdict is given (yet).
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest tram or metro stop (light rail included), according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor does it say how often anything calls there. Beneath it: the stop's name and how many tram and metro stops lie within 500 m or 1 km. No verdict is given.
The straight-line distance from this exact address to the nearest bus stop, according to OpenStreetMap. This is NOT a walking route: water, a railway, or a building in between can make the real distance longer. Nor does it say how often anything calls there. Beneath it: the stop's name and how many bus stops lie within 500 m or 1 km. No verdict is given.
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who say they are satisfied with the green in their surroundings. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole, not a measurement of the green around this address.
Why does it matter?
Green space nearby invites people outdoors and keeps the surroundings cooler in summer.
Original value
59.0%
Higher than 1.5% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
The verdict on supermarket, GP practice, primary school, secondary school and daycare centre compares the distance from this address with the average road distance in every Dutch neighbourhood (CBS 2025; secondary school: 2024). The straight-line distance is converted to a road distance for that. Playground, train station, tram or metro stop and bus stop carry no verdict: no national comparison is used for them.
Amenities within 3 km
Shopping
Health
Children & education
Getting around
Sport & green
Food & going out
Services
Counts what has been mapped in OpenStreetMap; a 0 can also mean nobody has mapped it. Schools from the DUO register, daycare from the LRK. Source: OpenStreetMap (extract 2026-09-13), DUO, LRK
00Environment
Where this address is exposed.
C
47/100
Road traffic noise (Lden)
Noisy (61 dB)
Attention
Road traffic noise (Lden)
61 dBNoisy
What is it?
How much noise road traffic makes at this home's facade on average, over a whole year. Evening and night-time noise counts more heavily, because it is more disturbing then. Measured in decibels (dB): 10 dB more sounds roughly twice as loud.
Why does it matter?
A lot of traffic noise can disturb your sleep and is a common source of annoyance. According to the WHO, living with high noise for years also raises the risk of heart and vascular disease.
Levels
Very quiet< 45 dB
Quiet45–50 dB
Average noise level50–55 dB
Noisy55–65 dBNow
Very noisy≥ 65 dB
Where do these limits come from? The WHO advises keeping road-traffic noise below 53 dB. The levels above are steps of 5 to 10 dB around that guideline.
Method
National noise map (RIVM Atlas Leefomgeving), published 2025-01-01, model year 2022. A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not a noise measurement at this exact address.
How much noise all sources together make at this home's facade on average, over a whole year: road traffic, trains, aircraft and industry. Evening and night-time noise counts more heavily. Measured in decibels (dB): 10 dB more sounds roughly twice as loud.
Why does it matter?
A lot of traffic noise can disturb your sleep and is a common source of annoyance. According to the WHO, living with high noise for years also raises the risk of heart and vascular disease.
Levels
Very quiet< 45 dB
Quiet45–50 dB
Average noise level50–55 dB
Noisy55–65 dBNow
Very noisy≥ 65 dB
Where do these limits come from? There is no official standard for noise from all sources combined, so we use the same levels as for road traffic, where the WHO advises staying below 53 dB.
Method
National noise map (RIVM Atlas Leefomgeving), published 2025-08-01, model year 2022. A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not a noise measurement at this exact address.
How much noise road traffic makes at this home's facade at night (23:00 to 07:00) on average, over a whole year. Measured in decibels (dB).
Why does it matter?
Night-time noise disturbs your sleep, even when it does not wake you. Sleeping badly for a long time can lead to tiredness and health problems.
Levels
Very quiet< 40 dB
Average noise level40–55 dBNow
Very noisy≥ 55 dB
Where do these limits come from? The limits come from the WHO's night-noise guidelines: below 40 dB, nights are quiet enough for healthy sleep. 55 dB is an interim target for places where 40 dB is not (yet) achievable.
Method
National noise map (RIVM Atlas Leefomgeving), published 2025-01-01, model year 2022. A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not a noise measurement at this exact address.
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are seriously annoyed by road traffic. This is how residents experience it, next to the measured decibels above. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
Annoyance is not the same as decibels: the same noise level bothers some people more than others. The figure shows how many residents are bothered.
Original value
11.4%
Higher than 90.5% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
4.8% sleep badly because of it (Utrecht 4.4%, the Netherlands 3.4%) · RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Serious noise annoyance from trains
1.3%
0.1 pp
similar to Utrecht
1.4%
0.3 pp
similar to the Netherlands
1.0%
Serious noise annoyance from trains
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are seriously annoyed by train traffic. Around 1% almost everywhere, so without a score: it only rises along the railway. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
Train noise matters mainly right next to the railway.
Original value
1.3%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
0.7% sleep badly because of it (Utrecht 0.7%, the Netherlands 0.5%) · RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Serious noise annoyance from aircraft
1.3%
0.8 pp
similar to Utrecht
2.1%
2.1 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
3.4%
Neutral
Serious noise annoyance from aircraft
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are seriously annoyed by air traffic. In most neighbourhoods it is under 2%; the rank mainly sets apart the ones under a flight path. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
Aircraft noise stands out because it is irregular and often also sounds in the evening and at night.
Original value
1.3%
Higher than 31.8% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
0.6% sleep badly because of it (Utrecht 0.9%, the Netherlands 1.5%) · RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Serious noise annoyance from wind turbines
0.3%
0.1 pp
similar to Utrecht
0.4%
0.3 pp
similar to the Netherlands
0.6%
Serious noise annoyance from wind turbines
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who are seriously annoyed by wind turbines. Around 0.5% almost everywhere, so without a score: it only rises right next to a wind farm. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
Wind turbines make noticeable noise only in their immediate vicinity.
Original value
0.3%
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Air quality: nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
Clean air (20.0 µg/m³)
Plus
Air quality: nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
20.0 µg/m³Clean air
What is it?
How much nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) there is in the outdoor air on average, over a whole year. NO₂ mainly comes from car and lorry exhausts, and from burning fuel in factories and boilers. Measured in micrograms per cubic metre of air (µg/m³). It is calculated with a model, not measured at this address.
Why does it matter?
NO₂ irritates the airways. Children and people with asthma or a lung condition are affected most.
Levels
Very clean air< 10 µg/m³
Clean air10–20 µg/m³Now
Reduced air quality20–40 µg/m³
Poor air quality≥ 40 µg/m³
Where do these limits come from? The WHO advises at most 10 µg/m³. The European limit is 40 µg/m³ today and becomes 20 µg/m³ from 2030.
Method
National concentration map 2024 (RIVM/CBS Grootschalige Concentratiekaarten Nederland, published 2026-04-01). A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not an air-quality measurement at this exact address.
How much particulate matter (PM10) there is in the outdoor air on average, over a whole year. These are dust particles smaller than 10 micrometres, from traffic, industry, farming and wood stoves, among others. Measured in micrograms per cubic metre of air (µg/m³). It is calculated with a model, not measured at this address.
Why does it matter?
You breathe particulate matter deep into your airways. Years of high exposure raise the risk of lung and heart problems.
Levels
Very clean air< 15 µg/m³
Clean air15–20 µg/m³Now
Average air quality20–30 µg/m³
Reduced air quality30–50 µg/m³
Poor air quality≥ 50 µg/m³
Where do these limits come from? The WHO advises at most 15 µg/m³. The other limits (20, 30 and 50 µg/m³) are WHO interim targets. The European limit is 40 µg/m³ today.
Method
National concentration map 2024 (RIVM/CBS Grootschalige Concentratiekaarten Nederland, published 2026-04-01). A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not an air-quality measurement at this exact address.
How much fine particulate matter (PM2.5) there is in the outdoor air on average, over a whole year. These are the smallest dust particles, under 2.5 micrometres, mostly from burning (traffic, wood stoves, industry) and farming. Measured in micrograms per cubic metre of air (µg/m³). It is calculated with a model, not measured at this address.
Why does it matter?
These particles are so small they can pass through the lungs into your blood. Of all air pollution, PM2.5 has the largest effect on health.
Levels
Very clean air< 5 µg/m³
Clean air5–10 µg/m³
Average air quality10–15 µg/m³Now
Reduced air quality15–25 µg/m³
Poor air quality≥ 25 µg/m³
Where do these limits come from? The WHO advises at most 5 µg/m³. The other limits (10, 15 and 25 µg/m³) are WHO interim targets. The European limit is 25 µg/m³ today and becomes 10 µg/m³ from 2030.
Method
National concentration map 2024 (RIVM/CBS Grootschalige Concentratiekaarten Nederland, published 2026-04-01). A modelled annual average on a national, coarse-resolution grid — not an air-quality measurement at this exact address.
How likely it is, per year, that this spot ends up under water in a flood, for example when a dike breaks. It is a national estimate per area, not a prediction that it will happen here soon.
Why does it matter?
A flood can cause major damage to your home and belongings. Most Dutch buildings insurance policies do not cover damage from a dike breach.
Levels
Does not floodNow
Chance below 1 in 3,000 per year
Chance of 1 in 300 to 1 in 3,000 per year
Chance of 1 in 30 to 1 in 300 per year
Chance above 1 in 30 per year
Where do these limits come from? The levels are the official classes of the location-specific flood probability in the Klimaateffectatlas: the yearly chance of water standing at this spot in a flood.
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who can cool down well indoors in hot weather. This is how residents experience it, next to the calculated heat stress above. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
A home that stays warm in summer makes sleeping and resting hard.
Original value
32.7%
Higher than 1.4% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Cooling down outdoors in hot weather
29.0%
10.6 pp
lower than in Utrecht
39.6%
27.4 pp
lower than in the Netherlands
56.4%
Attention
Cooling down outdoors in hot weather
What is it?
The share of adults (18+) in this neighbourhood who can cool down well outdoors in hot weather, for instance in shade or near water. An estimate for the neighbourhood as a whole.
Why does it matter?
Shade and water nearby make hot days outdoors easier to bear.
Original value
29.0%
Higher than 0.6% of all Dutch neighbourhoods.
Method
RIVM model estimate (Gezondheidsmonitor 2024) for the adults (18+) in the buurt, derived from national surveys and characteristics of the residents.
RIVM estimate based on who lives here, not a count.
Land subsidence
Little to no ground movement (−0.7 mm/year)
Land subsidence
−0.7 mm/yearLittle to no ground movement
What is it?
How many millimetres the ground here sinks or rises per year. A minus means the ground is sinking. It is an average over a square of about 50 by 50 metres, not a measurement of this home's foundation.
Why does it matter?
Sinking ground can cause cracks in walls, sticking doors, and subsiding gardens, paths and pipes. The greatest risk is to an older home without piles or on wooden piles, in an area with peat or clay. It is mainly uneven sinking that damages a house; this map shows the pace in the area, not how evenly it happens.
Levels
Ground rising> 1.5 mm/year
Little to no ground movement−1.5 to 1.5 mm/yearNow
Limited subsidence−5 to −1.5 mm/year
Strong subsidence−10 to −5 mm/year
Very strong subsidence≤ −10 mm/year
Where do these limits come from? The levels are the classes of the Klimaateffectatlas's national subsidence map. Rising ground is uncommon and not good or bad in itself.
Method
Klimaateffectatlas, national subsidence map (published 2026-06-23), approximately 50 m grid cell — not a measurement of this dwelling's foundation specifically.
Built in 2013: no known point of attention from this signal — wooden pile foundations were no longer standard practice by this construction period.
Wooden pile foundation attention point
Signals, based on build year and a national indicative postcode-area soil map, whether a wooden pile foundation and possible pile rot are worth having investigated. This is NOT a statement about this dwelling's actual foundation condition.
Original value
Built in 2013: no known point of attention from this signal — wooden pile foundations were no longer standard practice by this construction period.
Method
Wooden pile foundations were standard practice until roughly 1970 in settlement-sensitive soil regions; concrete piling became standard from 1970 onward (KCAF). This signals only the build year, not this dwelling's actual foundation.
Applications, decisions and notifications about building, demolition and felling around this address.
Building work nearby
169permits and notifications published within 500 m, past 6 months
126 building work
6 rental and hospitality
37 undescribed
Open the map below to see where each one is. It opens in a pop-up window.
The 169 notices within 500 m of this address come from officielebekendmakingen.nl (KOOP) and are the same ones summarised in the 'recent notices' row above. For 37 of them the municipality publishes only the permit type and the address, not what is being done.