The population is growing faster than in Zaltbommel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Zaltbommel, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Nederhemert is €431,000, 7% higher than in Zaltbommel (€404,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 62%, against a rise of 73% in Zaltbommel. 82% of the homes are owner-occupied, 15 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€431,000
▲7% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+62%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+73%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲15 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
7%
▼17 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 1945–1964
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (10%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Average WOZ value
€431,000
▲7% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+62%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+73%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
82%
▲15 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
7%
▼17 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 1945–1964
18%
▲8 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (10%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Built 1965–1974
10%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 62% between 2014 and 2025, to €431,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€431,000▲ 7% above Zaltbommel
+62% since 2014
Zaltbommel +73%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€310 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€310/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
145 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €431,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€112NL median
Water board levy€44–
Sewage levy€36€22
Property tax (OZB)€32€38
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Zaltbommel's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€198
Maintenance reserve€185–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 145 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €431,000.
Levies: Zaltbommel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Nederhemert has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 4 wijken in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €431,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Nederhemert
431,000
588
–
Zaltbommel
382,000
6,176
–
Brakel
406,000
3,184
–
Kerkwijk
453,000
2,375
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 82% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied82%
Social housing7%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
91% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes91%
Multi-family homes9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
19% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 14% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Before 194518.9%
1945-196417.8%
1965-19749.7%
1975-199116.5%
1992-20059.6%
2006-20158%
2016 and later19.5%
Explanation
Based on 647 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Zaltbommel average.
In 2025, 15 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Nederhemert, 59% lower than in Zaltbommel (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 29%, against a fall of 9% in Zaltbommel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼59% lower than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
-29%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼12% lower than Zaltbommel (2.6)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼59% lower than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
-29%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼12% lower than Zaltbommel (2.6)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Nederhemert registered 15 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Nederhemert15
The municipality of Zaltbommel37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Nederhemert is 'Traffic': 3.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 5.7 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
NederhemertZaltbommel
Traffic3.8
Zaltbommel 5.7▼ −33% vs Zaltbommel
Theft and burglary3.3
Zaltbommel 17.9▼ −82% vs Zaltbommel
Fraud and scams3.3
Zaltbommel 3.8▼ −13% vs Zaltbommel
Violence and threats2.2
Zaltbommel 3.0▼ −27% vs Zaltbommel
Vandalism and public order1.6
Zaltbommel 5.4▼ −70% vs Zaltbommel
Other and withheld0.5
Zaltbommel 0.5≈ Zaltbommel
Environmental0.0
Zaltbommel 0.2≈ Zaltbommel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Nederhemert registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Zaltbommel average; green space is below the Zaltbommel average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Nederhemert rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel. Fewer adults feel lonely (37% against 42%), fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 45%), fewer meet the physical activity guideline (39% against 42%) and fewer smoke (16% against 17%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Nederhemert, covering 73% of the area, against 64% in Zaltbommel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 10% in Zaltbommel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (45%)
Meets physical activity guideline
39%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Smokes
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
73%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (7%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (45%)
Meets physical activity guideline
39%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Smokes
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
73%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (7%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Zaltbommel
Good self-rated health
78%
74.2%
Smokes
15.6%
16.7%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.5%
Overweight
54.3%
54%
Lonely
37.3%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41.3%
44.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
39.3%
42.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Traffic1.5%
Built-up5.9%
Other built-up1.3%
Recreation0.3%
Agriculture73.1%
Forest and nature2.7%
Water15.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Zaltbommel average.
Nederhemert has 1,865 inhabitants (2026), or 220 per km² (44% lower than in Zaltbommel). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 17%, against a rise of 13% in Zaltbommel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Zaltbommel was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+17%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+13%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+19%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+16%)
Aged under 15
26%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (17%)
Never married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲12 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
39%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+17%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+13%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+19%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+16%)
Aged under 15
26%
▲9 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (17%)
Never married
48%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲12 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
39%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 17% between 2014 and 2026, to 1,865.
Residents, 2026
1,865
+17% since 2014
Zaltbommel +13%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 220 residents per km², this wijk is 44% less densely populated than the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Residents per km²220
Dwellings per km²69.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 19.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 2.7 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
26% of residents are between 0 and 15.
0 to 15480
15 to 25265
25 to 45430
45 to 65405
65 to 80230
80 and over60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
48% of residents are never married.
Never married890
Married845
Divorced65
Widowed70
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,755
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)60
Outside Europe50
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
39% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1330
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4480
Higher professional, university420
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Zaltbommel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Zaltbommel voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of ZaltbommelThe Netherlands
D66
12.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.3%
16.7%
VVD
12.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.2%
12.8%
CDA
12.3%
11.8%
JA21
6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
1.9%
2.6%
Other
24.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Nederhemert has an average of 1.5 cars per household, 15% higher than in Zaltbommel (1.3). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points less than in Zaltbommel (24%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
18%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
25%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
7%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−3 pp
=about the same as Zaltbommel (−3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (3%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
220
▼59% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business services, share of businesses
18%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
25%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
7%
▼6 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−3 pp
=about the same as Zaltbommel (−3 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Residential, share of addresses
88%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (3%)
Social housing
7%
▼21 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Residents per km²
220
▼59% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Single-family dwellings
91%
▲28 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 70 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij25
Nijverheid en energie70
Handel en horeca50
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie35
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed20
Zakelijke dienstverlening50
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg20
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
22% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2025).
Petrol78.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 24% to 22% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
22%▼ 2 percentage points below Zaltbommel (24%)
-2 pp since 2014
Zaltbommel -3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 905 passenger cars and 65 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars905
Motorcycles65
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
88% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (9%).
Residential88.4%
Retail1%
Office1.6%
Assembly1.4%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial8.7%
Lodging1%
Education0.3%
Sports0.1%
Other2.7%
Explanation
Based on 732 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
9% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings9%
NL 37%▼ −76% vs NL
Social housing7%
NL 28%▼ −75% vs NL
Residents per km²220
NL 539▼ −59% vs NL
Single-family dwellings91%
NL 63%▲ +44% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings82%
NL 57%▲ +44% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025