We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · Zaltbommel
Living in Kerkwijk
The population is growing faster than in Zaltbommel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Zaltbommel, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Kerkwijk is €453,000, 12% higher than in Zaltbommel (€404,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 70%, against a rise of 73% in Zaltbommel. 77% of the homes are owner-occupied, 10 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel (67%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€453,000
▲12% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+70%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+73%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲10 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
17%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
6%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 2006–2015
16%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (11%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Built before 1945
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Zaltbommel (15%)
Average WOZ value
€453,000
▲12% higher than Zaltbommel (€404,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+70%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+73%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
77%
▲10 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (67%)
Social housing
17%
▼7 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Private rent
6%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (9%)
Single-family dwellings
92%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Built 2006–2015
16%
▲5 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (11%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (15%)
Built before 1945
16%
▲1 percentage point higher than Zaltbommel (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 70% between 2014 and 2025, to €453,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€453,000▲ 12% above Zaltbommel
+70% since 2014
Zaltbommel +73%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€312 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€312/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
145 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €453,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€114NL median
Water board levy€45–
Sewage levy€36€22
Property tax (OZB)€33€40
Waste levy not included: a joint body (in Rivierenland, Avri) raises it on Zaltbommel's behalf, not the gemeente itself. Not counted in the total.
Costs to set aside€198
Maintenance reserve€185–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 145 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €453,000.
Levies: Zaltbommel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kerkwijk has the highest WOZ value of the 4 wijken in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €453,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kerkwijk
453,000
2,375
–
Zaltbommel
382,000
6,176
–
Brakel
406,000
3,184
–
Nederhemert
431,000
588
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 77% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied77%
Social housing17%
Private rent6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
92% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes92%
Multi-family homes8%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
18% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 20% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Before 194516.2%
1945-19649.4%
1965-197415.1%
1975-199118.1%
1992-200512.3%
2006-201516.2%
2016 and later12.7%
Explanation
Based on 2,532 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Zaltbommel average.
In 2025, 45 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Kerkwijk, 22% higher than in Zaltbommel (37). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 2%, against a fall of 9% in Zaltbommel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
45
▲22% higher than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
+2%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲38% higher than Zaltbommel (2.6)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
45
▲22% higher than Zaltbommel (37)
Change since 2021
+2%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
3.6
▲38% higher than Zaltbommel (2.6)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Kerkwijk registered 45 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 37 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Kerkwijk45
The municipality of Zaltbommel37
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Kerkwijk is 'Theft and burglary': 32.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 17.9 in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
KerkwijkZaltbommel
Theft and burglary32.8
Zaltbommel 17.9▲ +83% vs Zaltbommel
Traffic4.9
Zaltbommel 5.7▼ −14% vs Zaltbommel
Fraud and scams2.8
Zaltbommel 3.8▼ −26% vs Zaltbommel
Vandalism and public order2.5
Zaltbommel 5.4▼ −54% vs Zaltbommel
Violence and threats1.2
Zaltbommel 3.0▼ −60% vs Zaltbommel
Other and withheld0.6
Zaltbommel 0.5≈ Zaltbommel
Environmental0.2
Zaltbommel 0.2≈ Zaltbommel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kerkwijk registered 75 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Zaltbommel average; green space is below the Zaltbommel average.
An estimated 77% of adults in Kerkwijk rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Zaltbommel. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (42% against 45%), fewer feel lonely (40% against 42%), fewer smoke (16% against 17%) and fewer meet the physical activity guideline (41% against 42%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Kerkwijk, covering 77% of the area, against 64% in Zaltbommel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 4 percentage points below the 10% in Zaltbommel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Lonely
40%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (45%)
Smokes
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
41%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Water, share of the area
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
77%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
More figures
Lonely
40%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
42%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (45%)
Smokes
16%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
41%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (42%)
Agriculture, share of the area
77%
▲13 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (64%)
Water, share of the area
7%
▼5 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (12%)
Built-up, share of the area
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (10%)
Health
An estimated 77% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Zaltbommel
Good self-rated health
77%
74.2%
Smokes
15.6%
16.7%
Excessive drinking
5.7%
5.5%
Overweight
53.7%
54%
Lonely
40%
42.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
42.5%
44.8%
Meets physical activity guideline
41.2%
42.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Traffic3.7%
Built-up6.3%
Other built-up0.2%
Recreation2.1%
Agriculture77.4%
Forest and nature3.8%
Water6.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Zaltbommel average.
Kerkwijk has 6,630 inhabitants (2026), or 231 per km² (41% lower than in Zaltbommel). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 14%, against a rise of 13% in Zaltbommel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Zaltbommel was 85%, 7 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+14%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+13%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+16%)
Aged 45 to 65
25%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (26%)
Never married
46%
=about the same as Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+14%
▲higher than Zaltbommel (+13%)
Turnout, municipality of Zaltbommel
85%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+9%
▼lower than Zaltbommel (+16%)
Aged 45 to 65
25%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (26%)
Never married
46%
=about the same as Zaltbommel (46%)
Dutch origin
86%
▲4 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (82%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲6 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 14% between 2014 and 2026, to 6,630.
Residents, 2026
6,630
+14% since 2014
Zaltbommel +13%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 231 residents per km², this wijk is 41% less densely populated than the municipality of Zaltbommel.
Residents per km²231
Dwellings per km²82.6
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.7 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
25% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 151,195
15 to 25915
25 to 451,545
45 to 651,665
65 to 80970
80 and over350
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married3,030
Married2,980
Divorced315
Widowed310
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
86% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands5,730
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)620
Outside Europe280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
49% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo11,320
Havo, vwo, mbo2-42,330
Higher professional, university1,080
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Zaltbommel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 85% of eligible voters in Zaltbommel voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of ZaltbommelThe Netherlands
D66
12.5%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.3%
16.7%
VVD
12.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.2%
12.8%
CDA
12.3%
11.8%
JA21
6%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.7%
4.5%
BBB
1.9%
2.6%
Other
24.8%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Kerkwijk has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 8% higher than in Zaltbommel (1.3). 25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Zaltbommel (24%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (7%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−2 pp
▲higher than Zaltbommel (−3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (2%)
Residents per km²
231
▼57% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
14%
▲8 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (7%)
Business services, share of businesses
22%
▼2 percentage points lower than Zaltbommel (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲8% higher than Zaltbommel (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (24%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
−2 pp
▲higher than Zaltbommel (−3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
89%
▲3 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (86%)
Industrial, share of addresses
8%
▲2 percentage points higher than Zaltbommel (6%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Zaltbommel (2%)
Residents per km²
231
▼57% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Social housing
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 230 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij140
Nijverheid en energie185
Handel en horeca165
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie45
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed60
Zakelijke dienstverlening230
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg115
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten85
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 24% in the municipality of Zaltbommel (2025).
Petrol74.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 27% to 26% between 2014 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▲ 2 percentage points above Zaltbommel (24%)
-1 pp since 2014
Zaltbommel -3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 3,530 passenger cars and 275 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars3,530
Motorcycles275
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
89% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (8%).
Residential88.5%
Retail1.2%
Office1.2%
Assembly1.2%
Healthcare0.6%
Industrial7.9%
Lodging3.3%
Education0.2%
Sports0.2%
Other2.7%
Explanation
Based on 2,861 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
8% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings8%
NL 37%▼ −78% vs NL
Residents per km²231
NL 539▼ −57% vs NL
Private rent6%
NL 14%▼ −57% vs NL
Social housing17%
NL 28%▼ −39% vs NL
Single-family dwellings92%
NL 63%▲ +46% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025