Living in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Utrecht. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Utrecht, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e is €455,000, 7% lower than in Utrecht (€490,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 33%, against a rise of 37% in Utrecht. 54% of the homes are owner-occupied, 9 percentage points more than in Utrecht (45%). 14 homes are currently for sale, with asking prices from €299,000 to €695,000.
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€455,000
▼7% lower than Utrecht (€490,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Utrecht (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Utrecht (45%)
Social housing
25%
▼6 percentage points lower than Utrecht (31%)
Private rent
21%
▼3 percentage points lower than Utrecht (24%)
Single-family dwellings
31%
▼10 percentage points lower than Utrecht (41%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Utrecht (14%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Utrecht (9%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (11%)
Average WOZ value
€455,000
▼7% lower than Utrecht (€490,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+33%
▼lower than Utrecht (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
54%
▲9 percentage points higher than Utrecht (45%)
Social housing
25%
▼6 percentage points lower than Utrecht (31%)
Private rent
21%
▼3 percentage points lower than Utrecht (24%)
Single-family dwellings
31%
▼10 percentage points lower than Utrecht (41%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than Utrecht (14%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼9 percentage points lower than Utrecht (9%)
Built 1975–1991
4%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (11%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 33% between 2021 and 2025, to €455,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€455,000▼ 7% below Utrecht
+33% since 2021
Utrecht +37%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€252 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€252/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
87 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €455,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€133NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€35€40
Waste levy€31€27
Sewage levy€22€22
Costs to set aside€119
Maintenance reserve€111–
Buildings insurance€8–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Utrecht's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 156th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 87 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €455,000.
Levies: Utrecht's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e has the 6th-highest WOZ value of the 11 buurten in West.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €455,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e
455,000
2,596
–
Welgelegen, Den Hommel
462,000
911
–
Oog in Al
740,000
1,428
–
Halve Maan-Zuid
489,000
595
–
Halve Maan-Noord
377,000
887
–
Lombok-Oost
421,000
1,101
–
Leidseweg en omgeving
434,000
589
–
Lombok-West
450,000
2,323
–
Laan van Nieuw-Guinea, Spinozaweg e.o.
421,000
2,109
–
Schepenbuurt, Cartesiusweg e.o.
462,000
828
–
Bedrijventerrein Lageweide
548,000
65
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Asking prices
For the 14 homes for sale here the median asking price is €6,053 per m²; the middle half ask €5,706 to €7,144 per m².
Value
Homes for sale (with asking price and floor area)
14
Median asking price per m²
€6,053
Middle half
€5,706 – €7,144
Explanation
Asking prices of homes currently listed on Funda, not the prices homes sell for. Only homes HuisWeter has collected; the middle half runs from the first to the third quartile.
Source: Funda
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 54% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied54%
Social housing25%
Private rent21%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
69% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes31%
Multi-family homes69%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
65% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 28% in the municipality of Utrecht.
Before 194565.4%
1945-196416.8%
1965-19740.1%
1975-19914%
1992-20056.3%
2006-20157.3%
2016 and later0.1%
Explanation
Based on 2,494 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · For sale
14 homes for sale now
Asking prices from €299,000 to €695,000; median €6,053 per m². Asking prices, not sale prices.
Less registered crime per resident than the Utrecht average.
In 2025, 46 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e, 37% lower than in Utrecht (73). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 15%, against a rise of 21% in Utrecht. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▼37% lower than Utrecht (73)
Change since 2021
+15%
▼lower than Utrecht (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.6
▼13% lower than Utrecht (3.0)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
46
▼37% lower than Utrecht (73)
Change since 2021
+15%
▼lower than Utrecht (+21%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.6
▼13% lower than Utrecht (3.0)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e registered 46 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 73 in the municipality of Utrecht.
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e46
The municipality of Utrecht73
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e is 'Theft and burglary': 26.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 44.3 in the municipality of Utrecht.
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen eUtrecht
Theft and burglary26.1
Utrecht 44.3▼ −41% vs Utrecht
Traffic9.2
Utrecht 8.5▲ +8% vs Utrecht
Vandalism and public order3.4
Utrecht 7.4▼ −54% vs Utrecht
Fraud and scams2.9
Utrecht 4.7▼ −38% vs Utrecht
Violence and threats2.3
Utrecht 5.4▼ −57% vs Utrecht
Other and withheld2.3
Utrecht 2.6▼ −12% vs Utrecht
Environmental0.0
Utrecht 0.2≈ Utrecht
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e registered 25 traffic accidents, of which 7 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
04 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Utrecht average; green space is below the Utrecht average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Utrecht. Fewer adults are overweight (33% against 39%) and fewer feel lonely (43% against 47%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (63% against 57%) and more smoke (22% against 19%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e, covering 74% of the area, against 44% in Utrecht. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 9% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 16% in Utrecht.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (16%)
More figures
Overweight
33%
▼6 percentage points lower than Utrecht (39%)
Meets physical activity guideline
63%
▲6 percentage points higher than Utrecht (57%)
Lonely
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than Utrecht (47%)
Smokes
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (19%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲30 percentage points higher than Utrecht (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Utrecht (24%)
Traffic, share of the area
16%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (76%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (16%)
More figures
Overweight
33%
▼6 percentage points lower than Utrecht (39%)
Meets physical activity guideline
63%
▲6 percentage points higher than Utrecht (57%)
Lonely
43%
▼4 percentage points lower than Utrecht (47%)
Smokes
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (19%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲30 percentage points higher than Utrecht (44%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼24 percentage points lower than Utrecht (24%)
Traffic, share of the area
16%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (8%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 76% in the municipality of Utrecht (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Utrecht
Good self-rated health
79.1%
76.1%
Smokes
21.8%
18.9%
Excessive drinking
7.3%
6.3%
Overweight
33.3%
39.3%
Lonely
43.4%
47.2%
Anxiety or depression feelings
54.6%
53.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
62.6%
56.7%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
9% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 16% in the municipality of Utrecht.
Traffic15.5%
Built-up74.1%
Recreation8.6%
Water1.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
900 m
–
GP practice
700 m
–
Primary school
700 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
2.1
GP practices
–
1.5
Daycares
–
4.4
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
05 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Utrecht.
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e has 5,505 inhabitants (2026), or 9,672 per km² (2.4 times as high as in Utrecht). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 5%, against a rise of 5% in Utrecht. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Utrecht was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 27% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-5%
▼lower than Utrecht (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Utrecht
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Utrecht (+6%)
Aged 25 to 45
43%
▲6 percentage points higher than Utrecht (37%)
Never married
73%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (65%)
Dutch origin
64%
▲5 percentage points higher than Utrecht (59%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
62%
▲7 percentage points higher than Utrecht (55%)
D66, share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-5%
▼lower than Utrecht (+5%)
Turnout, municipality of Utrecht
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-2%
▼lower than Utrecht (+6%)
Aged 25 to 45
43%
▲6 percentage points higher than Utrecht (37%)
Never married
73%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (65%)
Dutch origin
64%
▲5 percentage points higher than Utrecht (59%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
62%
▲7 percentage points higher than Utrecht (55%)
D66, share of the vote
27%
▲10 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 5% between 2021 and 2026, to 5,505.
Residents, 2026
5,505
-5% since 2021
Utrecht +5%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 9,672 residents per km², this buurt is 2.4 times as densely populated as the municipality of Utrecht.
Residents per km²9,672
Dwellings per km²4,554.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 15.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; 2.7 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
43% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15775
15 to 25835
25 to 452,380
45 to 651,080
65 to 80335
80 and over95
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
73% of residents are never married.
Never married4,020
Married1,160
Divorced220
Widowed100
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
64% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands3,540
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)700
Outside Europe1,265
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
62% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1810
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4980
Higher professional, university2,900
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Utrecht; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Utrecht voted. The largest party was D66 with 27% of the valid votes.
Municipality of UtrechtThe Netherlands
D66
26.7%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
6.8%
16.7%
VVD
8.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
26.1%
12.8%
CDA
6.6%
11.8%
JA21
2.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
1.7%
4.5%
BBB
0.6%
2.6%
Other
20.1%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
06 · More figures
More figures
Nieuw Engeland, Th. a. Kempisplantsoen e has an average of 0.4 cars per household, 33% lower than in Utrecht (0.6). 22% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in Utrecht (28%).
Key figures
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
21%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (13%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than Utrecht (13%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
6%
▼1 percentage point lower than Utrecht (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.4
▼33% lower than Utrecht (0.6)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (28%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
=about the same as Utrecht (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (92%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Utrecht (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Utrecht (2%)
Single-family dwellings
31%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Multi-family dwellings
69%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
21%
▲8 percentage points higher than Utrecht (13%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than Utrecht (13%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
6%
▼1 percentage point lower than Utrecht (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.4
▼33% lower than Utrecht (0.6)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼7 percentage points lower than Utrecht (28%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
=about the same as Utrecht (+3 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
95%
▲3 percentage points higher than Utrecht (92%)
Office, share of addresses
1%
▼2 percentage points lower than Utrecht (3%)
Retail, share of addresses
1%
▼1 percentage point lower than Utrecht (2%)
Single-family dwellings
31%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Multi-family dwellings
69%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
21%
▲7 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 265 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie50
Handel en horeca75
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie110
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed25
Zakelijke dienstverlening265
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg185
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten185
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 28% in the municipality of Utrecht (2025).
Petrol78.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)21.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 19% to 21% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▼ 7 percentage points below Utrecht (28%)
+2 pp since 2021
Utrecht +3 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,370 passenger cars and 95 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,370
Motorcycles95
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
95% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (3%).
Residential94.7%
Retail0.6%
Office1.3%
Assembly0.8%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial2.8%
Education0.2%
Sports0.1%
Other3.4%
Explanation
Based on 2,634 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
9,672 residents per km²: 18 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²9,672
NL 539▲ +1694% vs NL
Single-family dwellings31%
NL 63%▼ −51% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings69%
NL 37%▲ +87% vs NL
Private rent21%
NL 14%▲ +50% vs NL
Average WOZ value€455,000
NL €398,000▲ +14% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026