We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
District · 's-Gravenhage
Living in Regentessekwartier
The population is growing slower than in 's-Gravenhage. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Regentessekwartier is €389,000, 2% higher than in 's-Gravenhage (€383,000). Between 2014 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 119%, against a rise of 104% in 's-Gravenhage. 35% of the homes are owner-occupied, 8 percentage points less than in 's-Gravenhage (43%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€389,000
▲2% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+119%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+104%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
35%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Rented from a housing corporation
17%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Rented from another landlord
48%
▲21 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 1945–1964
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 1992–2005
7%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
Average WOZ value
€389,000
▲2% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2014
+119%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+104%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
35%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Rented from a housing corporation
17%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Rented from another landlord
48%
▲21 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
12%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 1945–1964
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 1992–2005
7%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼5 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 119% between 2014 and 2025, to €389,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€389,000▲ 2% above 's-Gravenhage
+119% since 2014
's-Gravenhage +104%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€243 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€243/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
95 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €389,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€113NL median
Water board levy€43–
Waste levy€35€27
Property tax (OZB)€18€34
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€130
Maintenance reserve€121–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, 's-Gravenhage's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 24th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 95 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €389,000.
Levies: 's-Gravenhage's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Regentessekwartier has the 21st-lowest WOZ value of the 43 wijken in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €389,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Regentessekwartier
389,000
7,774
–
Belgisch Park
541,000
4,165
–
Westbroekpark en Duttendel
752,000
1,387
–
Benoordenhout
654,000
7,886
–
Archipelbuurt
658,000
3,764
–
Van Stolkpark en Scheveningse Bo
979,000
436
–
Scheveningen
425,000
10,984
–
Duindorp
377,000
2,840
–
Geuzen- en Statenkwartier
620,000
7,565
–
Zorgvliet
939,000
418
–
Duinoord
546,000
4,698
–
Bomen- en Bloemenbuurt
428,000
7,795
–
Vogelwijk
939,000
2,170
–
Bohemen en Meer en Bos
363,000
3,119
–
Kijkduin en Ockenburgh
670,000
1,673
–
Kraayenstein en Vroondaal
594,000
4,109
–
Loosduinen
325,000
8,751
–
Waldeck
308,000
10,020
–
Vruchtenbuurt
443,000
4,600
–
Valkenboskwartier
333,000
9,878
–
Zeeheldenkwartier
437,000
6,868
–
Willemspark
564,000
1,218
–
Haagse Bos
295,000
419
–
Mariahoeve en Marlot
301,000
8,931
–
Bezuidenhout
390,000
10,853
–
Stationsbuurt
289,000
7,165
–
Centrum
375,000
13,893
–
Schildersbuurt
269,000
12,740
–
Transvaalkwartier
276,000
6,205
–
Rustenburg en Oostbroek
255,000
8,529
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Who owns the homes
The largest group: rented from another landlord, 48% of homes.
Owner-occupied
Regentessekwartier
35%
's-Gravenhage
43%
the Netherlands
57%
Rented from a housing corporation
Regentessekwartier
17%
's-Gravenhage
30%
the Netherlands
28%
Rented from another landlord
Regentessekwartier
48%
's-Gravenhage
27%
the Netherlands
14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
What kind of homes
The largest group: apartments and other multi-family homes, 88% of homes.
Single-family houses
Regentessekwartier
12%
's-Gravenhage
21%
the Netherlands
63%
Apartments and other multi-family homes
Regentessekwartier
88%
's-Gravenhage
79%
the Netherlands
37%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
72% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 39% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Before 194572%
1945-19641.8%
1965-19740.7%
1975-19917.7%
1992-20056.9%
2006-20155.4%
2016 and later5.5%
Explanation
Based on 7,814 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the 's-Gravenhage average.
In 2025, 56 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Regentessekwartier, 19% lower than in 's-Gravenhage (69). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 2%, against a rise of 8% in 's-Gravenhage. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
56
▼19% lower than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
+2%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
More figures
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.5
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
3.74
▲12% higher than 's-Gravenhage (3.34)
Change since 2020
+116%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+83%)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
56
▼19% lower than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
+2%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
More figures
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.5
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
3.74
▲12% higher than 's-Gravenhage (3.34)
Change since 2020
+116%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+83%)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Regentessekwartier registered 56 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 69 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Regentessekwartier56
The municipality of 's-Gravenhage69
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Regentessekwartier is 'Theft and burglary': 29.0 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 31.7 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Regentessekwartier's-Gravenhage
Theft and burglary29.0
's-Gravenhage 31.7▼ −9% vs 's-Gravenhage
Traffic9.2
's-Gravenhage 11.7▼ −21% vs 's-Gravenhage
Vandalism and public order7.0
's-Gravenhage 8.2▼ −15% vs 's-Gravenhage
Violence and threats4.9
's-Gravenhage 8.4▼ −42% vs 's-Gravenhage
Fraud and scams4.4
's-Gravenhage 6.0▼ −27% vs 's-Gravenhage
Other and withheld1.8
's-Gravenhage 2.9▼ −38% vs 's-Gravenhage
Environmental0.2
's-Gravenhage 0.3≈ 's-Gravenhage
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Regentessekwartier registered 106 traffic accidents, of which 54 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the 's-Gravenhage average; green space is below the 's-Gravenhage average.
An estimated 72% of adults in Regentessekwartier rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage. Fewer adults are overweight (41% against 50%) and fewer feel lonely (53% against 56%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (58% against 50%) and more smoke (24% against 22%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Regentessekwartier, covering 83% of the area, against 50% in 's-Gravenhage. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 8% of the area, 17 percentage points below the 25% in 's-Gravenhage.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Overweight
41%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Meets physical activity guideline
58%
▲8 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Lonely
53%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Smokes
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (22%)
Built-up, share of the area
83%
▲33 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Water, share of the area
3%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (12%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
72%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
8%
▼17 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Overweight
41%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Meets physical activity guideline
58%
▲8 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Lonely
53%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Smokes
24%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (22%)
Built-up, share of the area
83%
▲33 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Water, share of the area
3%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (12%)
Health
An estimated 72% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2024).
This areaThe municipality of 's-Gravenhage
Good self-rated health
72.5%
68.6%
Smokes
23.7%
21.7%
Excessive drinking
6.3%
5.1%
Overweight
41.2%
49.5%
Lonely
52.8%
56.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
57.2%
55.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
58.1%
50.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
8% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Traffic5.3%
Built-up83.2%
Recreation8.4%
Water3.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the 's-Gravenhage average.
Regentessekwartier has 14,375 inhabitants (2026), or 15,712 per km² (2.3 times as high as in 's-Gravenhage). Between 2014 and 2026 the population rose 6%, against a rise of 12% in 's-Gravenhage. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage was 69%, 9 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+6%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+16%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+10%)
Aged 25 to 45
39%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
68%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
43%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+6%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+16%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+10%)
Aged 25 to 45
39%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
68%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
43%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 6% between 2014 and 2026, to 14,375.
Residents, 2026
14,375
+6% since 2014
's-Gravenhage +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 15,712 residents per km², this wijk is 2.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Residents per km²15,712
Dwellings per km²8,542.9
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 12.1 children were born per 1,000 residents; 4.9 died per 1,000.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
39% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 151,975
15 to 251,745
25 to 455,550
45 to 653,400
65 to 801,400
80 and over305
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
68% of residents are never married.
Never married9,765
Married3,230
Divorced1,080
Widowed295
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
42% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands6,110
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)3,250
Outside Europe5,015
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
52% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo12,390
Havo, vwo, mbo2-43,360
Higher professional, university6,110
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of 's-Gravenhage; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 69% of eligible voters in 's-Gravenhage voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of 's-GravenhageThe Netherlands
D66
19.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.8%
16.7%
VVD
12.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
16.5%
12.8%
CDA
6.8%
11.8%
JA21
4.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.4%
4.5%
BBB
0.8%
2.6%
Other
20.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Regentessekwartier has an average of 0.5 cars per household, 29% lower than in 's-Gravenhage (0.7). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 6 percentage points less than in 's-Gravenhage (27%).
Key figures
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
16%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Business services, share of businesses
27%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.5
▼29% lower than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Retail, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Single-family dwellings
12%
▼51 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Rented from another landlord
48%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
88%
▲51 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
16%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Business services, share of businesses
27%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (24%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.5
▼29% lower than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+5 pp
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Retail, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
3%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Single-family dwellings
12%
▼51 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Rented from another landlord
48%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
88%
▲51 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 805 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij95
Nijverheid en energie510
Handel en horeca350
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie200
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed60
Zakelijke dienstverlening805
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg505
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten495
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 27% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2025).
Petrol79.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 15% to 21% between 2014 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 3,770 passenger cars and 275 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars3,770
Motorcycles275
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
93% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (3%).
Residential92.8%
Retail3.2%
Office1.2%
Assembly0.9%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial2.6%
Other1.9%
Explanation
Based on 8,424 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
15,712 residents per km²: 29 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²15,712
NL 539▲ +2815% vs NL
Single-family dwellings12%
NL 63%▼ −81% vs NL
Rented from another landlord48%
NL 14%▲ +243% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings88%
NL 37%▲ +138% vs NL
Rented from a housing corporation17%
NL 28%▼ −39% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026