The average WOZ value in Forepark is €757,000, 98% higher than in 's-Gravenhage (€383,000). Between 2019 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 41%, against a rise of 64% in 's-Gravenhage. 89% of the homes are owner-occupied, 46 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage (43%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€757,000
▲98% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+41%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+64%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲46 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
0%
▼30 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
11%
▼16 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲75 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 1992–2005
32%
▲17 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1945–1964
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 2016 and later
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (7%)
Average WOZ value
€757,000
▲98% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2019
+41%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+64%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲46 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
0%
▼30 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
11%
▼16 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲75 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 1992–2005
32%
▲17 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1945–1964
2%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 2016 and later
13%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (7%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 41% between 2019 and 2025, to €757,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€757,000▲ 98% above 's-Gravenhage
+41% since 2019
's-Gravenhage +64%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€269 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€269/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
95 m² · estimated gemeente average
WOZ €757,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€139NL median
Water board levy€53–
Waste levy€35€27
Property tax (OZB)€34€66
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€130
Maintenance reserve€121–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, 's-Gravenhage's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 6th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 95 m² (estimated gemeente average) with the average WOZ value here, €757,000.
Levies: 's-Gravenhage's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Forepark has the 4th-highest WOZ value of the 43 wijken in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €757,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Forepark
757,000
47
–
Belgisch Park
541,000
4,165
–
Westbroekpark en Duttendel
752,000
1,387
–
Benoordenhout
654,000
7,886
–
Archipelbuurt
658,000
3,764
–
Van Stolkpark en Scheveningse Bo
979,000
436
–
Scheveningen
425,000
10,984
–
Duindorp
377,000
2,840
–
Geuzen- en Statenkwartier
620,000
7,565
–
Zorgvliet
939,000
418
–
Duinoord
546,000
4,698
–
Bomen- en Bloemenbuurt
428,000
7,795
–
Vogelwijk
939,000
2,170
–
Bohemen en Meer en Bos
363,000
3,119
–
Kijkduin en Ockenburgh
670,000
1,673
–
Kraayenstein en Vroondaal
594,000
4,109
–
Loosduinen
325,000
8,751
–
Waldeck
308,000
10,020
–
Vruchtenbuurt
443,000
4,600
–
Valkenboskwartier
333,000
9,878
–
Regentessekwartier
389,000
7,774
–
Zeeheldenkwartier
437,000
6,868
–
Willemspark
564,000
1,218
–
Haagse Bos
295,000
419
–
Mariahoeve en Marlot
301,000
8,931
–
Bezuidenhout
390,000
10,853
–
Stationsbuurt
289,000
7,165
–
Centrum
375,000
13,893
–
Schildersbuurt
269,000
12,740
–
Transvaalkwartier
276,000
6,205
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 89% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied89%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
32% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 39% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Before 194531.9%
1945-19642.1%
1965-19744.3%
1975-199114.9%
1992-200531.9%
2006-20152.1%
2016 and later12.8%
Explanation
Based on 47 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Forepark has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 243 crimes were registered, against 222 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
243
▲up from 222 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
337.93
▲101 times as high as 's-Gravenhage (3.34)
Change since 2020
+98%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+83%)
Registered crimes, 2025
243
▲up from 222 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Injury accidents per 1,000 residents (2024)
337.93
▲101 times as high as 's-Gravenhage (3.34)
Change since 2020
+98%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+83%)
Registered crime per year
243 crimes were registered in Forepark in 2025 (222 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
243
up from 222 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Forepark is 'Traffic': 111 in 2025.
Traffic111
Theft and burglary81
Vandalism and public order17
Violence and threats15
Other and withheld11
Fraud and scams7
Environmental1
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Forepark registered 268 traffic accidents, of which 49 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the 's-Gravenhage average; green space is below the 's-Gravenhage average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Forepark rate their own health as good, 9 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage. Fewer adults feel lonely (42% against 56%), fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 55%) and fewer smoke (14% against 22%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (56% against 50%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Forepark, covering 38% of the area, against 50% in 's-Gravenhage. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 19% of the area, 6 percentage points below the 25% in 's-Gravenhage.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Lonely
42%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Smokes
14%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (22%)
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Traffic, share of the area
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
17%
▲15 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲9 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
19%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Lonely
42%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Smokes
14%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (22%)
Meets physical activity guideline
56%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Traffic, share of the area
23%
▲17 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (6%)
Agriculture, share of the area
17%
▲15 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2024).
This areaThe municipality of 's-Gravenhage
Good self-rated health
78.1%
68.6%
Smokes
14.2%
21.7%
Excessive drinking
6.1%
5.1%
Overweight
45.7%
49.5%
Lonely
41.6%
56.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
55.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
56.1%
50.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
19% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Traffic22.8%
Built-up38.3%
Other built-up0.7%
Recreation18.5%
Agriculture17.5%
Forest and nature0.3%
Water2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the 's-Gravenhage average.
Forepark has 155 inhabitants (2026), or 52 per km² (99% lower than in 's-Gravenhage). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage was 69%, 9 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2014
+0%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+18%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (26%)
Never married
45%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
69%
▲30 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2014
+0%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+18%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+10%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (26%)
Never married
45%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
69%
▲30 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2014 and 2026, at 155.
Residents, 2026
155
+0% since 2014
's-Gravenhage +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 52 residents per km², this wijk is 99% less densely populated than the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Residents per km²52
Dwellings per km²15.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 33.3 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1525
15 to 2515
25 to 4535
45 to 6545
65 to 8035
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married70
Married70
Divorced15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
69% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands110
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)25
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of 's-Gravenhage; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 69% of eligible voters in 's-Gravenhage voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of 's-GravenhageThe Netherlands
D66
19.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.8%
16.7%
VVD
12.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
16.5%
12.8%
CDA
6.8%
11.8%
JA21
4.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.4%
4.5%
BBB
0.8%
2.6%
Other
20.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
67% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 40 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage (27%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲11 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼10 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
7%
▼10 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
67%
▲40 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+21 pp
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
7%
▼84 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
46%
▲44 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Lodging, share of addresses
18%
▲18 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
4%
▼33 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€757,000
▲90% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
24%
▲11 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
11%
▼10 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
7%
▼10 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
67%
▲40 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2014
+21 pp
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
7%
▼84 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
46%
▲44 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Lodging, share of addresses
18%
▲18 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
4%
▼33 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€757,000
▲90% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 270 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie95
Handel en horeca205
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie110
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed60
Zakelijke dienstverlening270
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg60
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
67% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 27% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2025).
Petrol33.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)66.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 46% to 67% between 2014 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,240 passenger cars and 25 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,240
Motorcycles25
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
7% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (46%).
Residential7.5%
Retail0.8%
Office16.1%
Assembly2.2%
Industrial46.5%
Lodging18.5%
Education0.3%
Sports1%
Other8.4%
Explanation
Based on 628 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
52 residents per km²: 90% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²52
NL 539▼ −90% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Average WOZ value€757,000
NL €398,000▲ +90% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings89%
NL 57%▲ +56% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026