We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · 's-Gravenhage
Living in Rosenburg
The population is growing about as fast as in 's-Gravenhage. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Rosenburg is €324,000, 15% lower than in 's-Gravenhage (€383,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 31%, against a rise of 34% in 's-Gravenhage. 30% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points less than in 's-Gravenhage (43%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€324,000
▼15% lower than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+31%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
30%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
36%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 2016 and later
19%
▲12 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (7%)
Built 1945–1964
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Average WOZ value
€324,000
▼15% lower than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+31%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
30%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
36%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
2%
▼19 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built 2016 and later
19%
▲12 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (7%)
Built 1945–1964
5%
▼9 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Built 1992–2005
8%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 31% between 2021 and 2025, to €324,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€324,000▼ 15% below 's-Gravenhage
+31% since 2021
's-Gravenhage +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€219 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€219/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
82 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €324,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€108NL median
Water board levy€41–
Waste levy€35€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Property tax (OZB)€15€28
Costs to set aside€111
Maintenance reserve€104–
Buildings insurance€7–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, 's-Gravenhage's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 32nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 82 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €324,000.
Levies: 's-Gravenhage's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Rosenburg has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Waldeck.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €324,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Rosenburg
324,000
1,859
–
Waldeck-Zuid
275,000
1,194
–
Nieuw Waldeck
293,000
3,648
–
Componistenbuurt
406,000
1,069
–
Waldeck-Noord
293,000
2,250
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is social housing, at 36% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied30%
Social housing36%
Private rent33%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
98% of the dwelling stock is multi-family homes.
Single-family homes2%
Multi-family homes98%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
44% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 39% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Before 194543.9%
1945-19645.3%
1965-197410.4%
1975-19916.8%
1992-20057.8%
2006-20157%
2016 and later18.7%
Explanation
Based on 2,005 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the 's-Gravenhage average.
In 2025, 92 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Rosenburg, 33% higher than in 's-Gravenhage (69). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 1%, against a rise of 8% in 's-Gravenhage. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
92
▲33% higher than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
-1%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼8% lower than 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
92
▲33% higher than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
-1%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.3
▼8% lower than 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Rosenburg registered 92 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 69 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Rosenburg92
The municipality of 's-Gravenhage69
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Rosenburg is 'Theft and burglary': 39.4 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 31.7 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Rosenburg's-Gravenhage
Theft and burglary39.4
's-Gravenhage 31.7▲ +24% vs 's-Gravenhage
Violence and threats16.3
's-Gravenhage 8.4▲ +94% vs 's-Gravenhage
Traffic13.6
's-Gravenhage 11.7▲ +16% vs 's-Gravenhage
Vandalism and public order11.1
's-Gravenhage 8.2▲ +35% vs 's-Gravenhage
Fraud and scams7.4
's-Gravenhage 6.0▲ +23% vs 's-Gravenhage
Other and withheld3.4
's-Gravenhage 2.9▲ +17% vs 's-Gravenhage
Environmental0.9
's-Gravenhage 0.3≈ 's-Gravenhage
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Rosenburg registered 21 traffic accidents, of which 17 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the 's-Gravenhage average; green space is below the 's-Gravenhage average.
An estimated 66% of adults in Rosenburg rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points less than in 's-Gravenhage. Fewer adults meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 50%) and fewer smoke (21% against 22%), but more are overweight (52% against 50%) and more drink excessively (6% against 5%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Rosenburg, covering 76% of the area, against 50% in 's-Gravenhage. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 18% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 25% in 's-Gravenhage.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
66%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Overweight
52%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
54%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Lonely
55%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Built-up, share of the area
76%
▲26 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (12%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
66%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
18%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
44%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Overweight
52%
▲2 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
54%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Lonely
55%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Built-up, share of the area
76%
▲26 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼13 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (12%)
Health
An estimated 66% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2024).
This areaThe municipality of 's-Gravenhage
Good self-rated health
66.2%
68.6%
Smokes
21.1%
21.7%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
5.1%
Overweight
52%
49.5%
Lonely
55.4%
56.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
53.5%
55.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.1%
50.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
18% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Traffic3.9%
Built-up76.5%
Recreation17.6%
Water2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
800 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1
GP practices
–
2.4
Daycares
–
7.8
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the 's-Gravenhage average.
Rosenburg has 3,365 inhabitants (2026), or 6,653 per km² (3% lower than in 's-Gravenhage). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 4%, the same as in 's-Gravenhage. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage was 69%, 9 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+4%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
53%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
61%
▲22 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+4%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
53%
▼6 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Dutch origin
61%
▲22 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 4% between 2021 and 2026, to 3,365.
Residents, 2026
3,365
+4% since 2021
's-Gravenhage +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 6,653 residents per km², this buurt is 3% less densely populated than the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Residents per km²6,653
Dwellings per km²3,645.1
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 29.3 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15305
15 to 25215
25 to 45930
45 to 65780
65 to 80825
80 and over315
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
53% of residents are never married.
Never married1,780
Married835
Divorced480
Widowed265
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
61% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,035
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)400
Outside Europe925
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
43% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1530
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4800
Higher professional, university1,020
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of 's-Gravenhage; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 69% of eligible voters in 's-Gravenhage voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of 's-GravenhageThe Netherlands
D66
19.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.8%
16.7%
VVD
12.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
16.5%
12.8%
CDA
6.8%
11.8%
JA21
4.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.4%
4.5%
BBB
0.8%
2.6%
Other
20.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Rosenburg has an average of 0.6 cars per household, 14% lower than in 's-Gravenhage (0.7). 19% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 8 percentage points less than in 's-Gravenhage (27%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▼5 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.6
▼14% lower than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Residents per km²
6,653
▲12 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Multi-family dwellings
98%
▲61 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
33%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
16%
▼5 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
21%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
16%
▲3 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.6
▼14% lower than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
19%
▼8 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+8 pp
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (+8 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than 's-Gravenhage (0%)
Residential, share of addresses
91%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Residents per km²
6,653
▲12 times as high as the Netherlands (539)
Multi-family dwellings
98%
▲61 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Private rent
33%
▲19 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 90 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie60
Handel en horeca60
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie30
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening90
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg80
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
19% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 27% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2025).
Petrol80.5%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)19.5%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 11% to 19% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,105 passenger cars and 60 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,105
Motorcycles60
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
91% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (3%).
Residential91.4%
Retail2.6%
Office0.8%
Assembly0.6%
Healthcare1.2%
Industrial0.3%
Education0.2%
Sports0.4%
Other3.1%
Explanation
Based on 2,193 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2% single-family dwellings, against 63% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Single-family dwellings2%
NL 63%▼ −97% vs NL
Residents per km²6,653
NL 539▲ +1134% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings98%
NL 37%▲ +165% vs NL
Private rent33%
NL 14%▲ +136% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings30%
NL 57%▼ −47% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025