We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · 's-Gravenhage
Living in Erasmus Veld
The population is growing faster than in 's-Gravenhage. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Erasmus Veld is €437,000, 14% higher than in 's-Gravenhage (€383,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 25%, against a rise of 34% in 's-Gravenhage. 47% of the homes are owner-occupied, 4 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage (43%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€437,000
▲14% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+25%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
37%
▲7 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
16%
▼11 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
51%
▲30 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built before 1945
1%
▼38 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
Built 1992–2005
42%
▲27 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1945–1964
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Average WOZ value
€437,000
▲14% higher than 's-Gravenhage (€383,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+25%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
Social housing
37%
▲7 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Private rent
16%
▼11 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Single-family dwellings
51%
▲30 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Built before 1945
1%
▼38 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (39%)
Built 1992–2005
42%
▲27 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Built 1945–1964
0%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 25% between 2021 and 2025, to €437,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€437,000▲ 14% above 's-Gravenhage
+25% since 2021
's-Gravenhage +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€272 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€272/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
114 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €437,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€116NL median
Water board levy€44–
Waste levy€35€27
Property tax (OZB)€20€38
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€156
Maintenance reserve€146–
Buildings insurance€10–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, 's-Gravenhage's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 16th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 114 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €437,000.
Levies: 's-Gravenhage's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Erasmus Veld has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Wateringse Veld.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €437,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Erasmus Veld
437,000
1,524
–
Hoge Veld
501,000
3,169
–
Parkbuurt oosteinde
572,000
1,247
–
Lage Veld
411,000
1,631
–
Zonne Veld
469,000
1,137
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 47% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied47%
Social housing37%
Private rent16%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
51% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes51%
Multi-family homes49%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
55% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 7% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Before 19450.6%
1945-19640.4%
1965-19740.1%
1975-19910.3%
1992-200542.4%
2006-20151.3%
2016 and later55%
Explanation
Based on 1,583 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the 's-Gravenhage average.
In 2025, 33 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Erasmus Veld, 52% lower than in 's-Gravenhage (69). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 2%, against a rise of 8% in 's-Gravenhage. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
33
▼52% lower than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
+2%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▲12% higher than 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
33
▼52% lower than 's-Gravenhage (69)
Change since 2021
+2%
▼lower than 's-Gravenhage (+8%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.8
▲12% higher than 's-Gravenhage (2.5)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Erasmus Veld registered 33 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 69 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Erasmus Veld33
The municipality of 's-Gravenhage69
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Erasmus Veld is 'Theft and burglary': 17.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 31.7 in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Erasmus Veld's-Gravenhage
Theft and burglary17.1
's-Gravenhage 31.7▼ −46% vs 's-Gravenhage
Traffic5.9
's-Gravenhage 11.7▼ −50% vs 's-Gravenhage
Violence and threats4.1
's-Gravenhage 8.4▼ −51% vs 's-Gravenhage
Fraud and scams3.2
's-Gravenhage 6.0▼ −47% vs 's-Gravenhage
Vandalism and public order2.7
's-Gravenhage 8.2▼ −67% vs 's-Gravenhage
Other and withheld0.2
's-Gravenhage 2.9▼ −93% vs 's-Gravenhage
Environmental0.0
's-Gravenhage 0.3≈ 's-Gravenhage
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Erasmus Veld registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the 's-Gravenhage average; green space is above the 's-Gravenhage average.
An estimated 73% of adults in Erasmus Veld rate their own health as good, 4 percentage points more than in 's-Gravenhage. More adults are overweight (54% against 50%), but fewer meet the physical activity guideline (46% against 50%), fewer report anxiety or depression (52% against 55%) and fewer drink excessively (3% against 5%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Erasmus Veld, covering 43% of the area, against 50% in 's-Gravenhage. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 39% of the area, 14 percentage points above the 25% in 's-Gravenhage.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
39%
▲14 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Overweight
54%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
52%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Lonely
54%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Recreation, share of the area
39%
▲25 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Other built-up, share of the area
14%
▲12 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
73%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
39%
▲14 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (25%)
More figures
Overweight
54%
▲4 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Meets physical activity guideline
46%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (50%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
52%
▼3 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (55%)
Lonely
54%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (56%)
Recreation, share of the area
39%
▲25 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (14%)
Water, share of the area
1%
▼14 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (15%)
Other built-up, share of the area
14%
▲12 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Health
An estimated 73% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2024).
This areaThe municipality of 's-Gravenhage
Good self-rated health
73%
68.6%
Smokes
21.7%
21.7%
Excessive drinking
3.4%
5.1%
Overweight
53.9%
49.5%
Lonely
53.7%
56.5%
Anxiety or depression feelings
52.5%
55.4%
Meets physical activity guideline
46.5%
50.2%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
39% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 25% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Traffic1.3%
Built-up43.4%
Other built-up14.5%
Recreation39.5%
Water1.3%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 900 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,200 m
–
GP practice
1,000 m
–
Primary school
1,000 m
–
Daycare
900 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.4
GP practices
–
0.4
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the 's-Gravenhage average.
Erasmus Veld has 4,380 inhabitants (2026), or 5,790 per km² (16% lower than in 's-Gravenhage). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 64%, against a rise of 4% in 's-Gravenhage. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage was 69%, 9 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+64%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+46%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
30%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
52%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Origin outside Europe
56%
▲13 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+64%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+4%)
Turnout, municipality of 's-Gravenhage
69%
▼9 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+46%
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+3%)
Aged 25 to 45
30%
=about the same as 's-Gravenhage (30%)
Never married
52%
▼7 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (59%)
Origin outside Europe
56%
▲13 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (43%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 64% between 2021 and 2026, to 4,380.
Residents, 2026
4,380
+64% since 2021
's-Gravenhage +4%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 5,790 residents per km², this buurt is 16% less densely populated than the municipality of 's-Gravenhage.
Residents per km²5,790
Dwellings per km²2,005.3
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 11.0 children were born per 1,000 residents; 28.0 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
30% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15860
15 to 25470
25 to 451,295
45 to 651,035
65 to 80490
80 and over225
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
52% of residents are never married.
Never married2,285
Married1,515
Divorced380
Widowed195
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
56% of residents have origin outside Europe.
Netherlands1,590
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)320
Outside Europe2,475
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
35% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1940
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,010
Higher professional, university920
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of 's-Gravenhage; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 69% of eligible voters in 's-Gravenhage voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of 's-GravenhageThe Netherlands
D66
19.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.8%
16.7%
VVD
12.2%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
16.5%
12.8%
CDA
6.8%
11.8%
JA21
4.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.4%
4.5%
BBB
0.8%
2.6%
Other
20.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Erasmus Veld has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 43% higher than in 's-Gravenhage (0.7). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point less than in 's-Gravenhage (27%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▲43% higher than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+9 pp
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+8 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
97%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
49%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
37%
▲9 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
51%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (17%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
6%
▼4 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
19%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (21%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▲43% higher than 's-Gravenhage (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (27%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+9 pp
▲higher than 's-Gravenhage (+8 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
97%
▲6 percentage points higher than 's-Gravenhage (91%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than 's-Gravenhage (2%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than 's-Gravenhage (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
49%
▲12 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
37%
▲9 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
51%
▼12 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 150 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij15
Nijverheid en energie115
Handel en horeca65
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie55
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening145
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg150
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 27% in the municipality of 's-Gravenhage (2025).
Petrol73.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)26.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 17% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%▼ 1 percentage point below 's-Gravenhage (27%)
+9 pp since 2021
's-Gravenhage +8 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,635 passenger cars and 80 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,635
Motorcycles80
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
97% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is office (0.4%).
Residential97.5%
Office0.4%
Assembly0.2%
Healthcare0.1%
Industrial0.1%
Lodging0.1%
Sports0.2%
Other1.7%
Explanation
Based on 1,624 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5,790 residents per km²: 11 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²5,790
NL 539▲ +974% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings49%
NL 37%▲ +32% vs NL
Social housing37%
NL 28%▲ +32% vs NL
Single-family dwellings51%
NL 63%▼ −19% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings47%
NL 57%▼ −17% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026