The population is growing faster than in Rotterdam. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Rotterdam, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Schieveen is €633,000, 85% higher than in Rotterdam (€342,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 1%, against a rise of 2% in Rotterdam. 84% of the homes are owner-occupied, 49 percentage points more than in Rotterdam (35%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€633,000
▲85% higher than Rotterdam (€342,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+1%
▼lower than Rotterdam (+2%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲49 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (35%)
Social housing
0%
▼43 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (43%)
Private rent
16%
▼6 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (22%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲70 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (25%)
Built 1975–1991
6%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (21%)
Built 1945–1964
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (16%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼10 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (12%)
Average WOZ value
€633,000
▲85% higher than Rotterdam (€342,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+1%
▼lower than Rotterdam (+2%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
84%
▲49 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (35%)
Social housing
0%
▼43 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (43%)
Private rent
16%
▼6 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (22%)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲70 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (25%)
Built 1975–1991
6%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (21%)
Built 1945–1964
5%
▼11 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (16%)
Built 1992–2005
2%
▼10 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value held steady between 2024 and 2025, at €633,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€633,000▲ 85% above Rotterdam
+1% since 2024
Rotterdam +2%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€387 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€387/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
172 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €633,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€153NL median
Water board levy€50–
Property tax (OZB)€38€56
Waste levy€35€27
Sewage levy€30€22
Costs to set aside€234
Maintenance reserve€219–
Buildings insurance€15–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Rotterdam's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 142nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 172 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €633,000.
Levies: Rotterdam's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Schieveen has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Overschie.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €633,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Schieveen
633,000
148
–
Kleinpolder
306,000
4,143
–
Noord Kethel
758,000
27
–
Zestienhoven
779,000
1,492
–
Overschie
375,000
3,364
–
Landzicht
250,000
198
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 84% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied84%
Private rent16%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
95% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes95%
Multi-family homes5%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
68% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 29% in the municipality of Rotterdam.
Before 194567.5%
1945-19644.6%
1965-19742.6%
1975-19916%
1992-20052%
2006-20156.6%
2016 and later10.6%
Explanation
Based on 151 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Rotterdam average.
In 2025, 129 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Schieveen, 63% higher than in Rotterdam (79). Since 2024 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 1%, against a fall of 3% in Rotterdam. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
129
▲63% higher than Rotterdam (79)
Change since 2024
-1%
▲higher than Rotterdam (-3%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
129
▲63% higher than Rotterdam (79)
Change since 2024
-1%
▲higher than Rotterdam (-3%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Schieveen registered 129 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 79 in the municipality of Rotterdam.
Schieveen129
The municipality of Rotterdam79
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Schieveen is 'Traffic': 91.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 14.0 in the municipality of Rotterdam.
SchieveenRotterdam
Traffic91.2
Rotterdam 14.0▲ +551% vs Rotterdam
Theft and burglary29.4
Rotterdam 34.8▼ −16% vs Rotterdam
Vandalism and public order2.9
Rotterdam 8.1▼ −64% vs Rotterdam
Violence and threats2.9
Rotterdam 10.7▼ −73% vs Rotterdam
Fraud and scams2.9
Rotterdam 6.5▼ −55% vs Rotterdam
Environmental0.0
Rotterdam 0.5≈ Rotterdam
Other and withheld0.0
Rotterdam 3.9▼ −100% vs Rotterdam
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Schieveen registered 54 traffic accidents, of which 8 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Rotterdam average; green space is below the Rotterdam average.
An estimated 80% of adults in Schieveen rate their own health as good, 13 percentage points more than in Rotterdam. Fewer adults feel lonely (37% against 55%), fewer report anxiety or depression (41% against 56%), fewer smoke (15% against 23%) and fewer are overweight (48% against 53%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Schieveen, covering 78% of the area, against 7% in Rotterdam. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 1% of the area, 9 percentage points below the 10% in Rotterdam.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (67%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
1%
▼9 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (10%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼18 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (55%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (56%)
Smokes
15%
▼8 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (23%)
Overweight
48%
▼5 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲71 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (7%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼35 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (38%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼30 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (32%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (67%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
1%
▼9 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (10%)
More figures
Lonely
37%
▼18 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (55%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (56%)
Smokes
15%
▼8 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (23%)
Overweight
48%
▼5 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
78%
▲71 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (7%)
Built-up, share of the area
3%
▼35 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (38%)
Water, share of the area
2%
▼30 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (32%)
Health
An estimated 80% of adults rate their own health as good, against 67% in the municipality of Rotterdam (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Rotterdam
Good self-rated health
80%
67%
Smokes
15.2%
22.9%
Excessive drinking
6.5%
5.4%
Overweight
47.8%
53%
Lonely
36.6%
54.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.8%
56%
Meets physical activity guideline
49.6%
45.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
0.9% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Rotterdam.
Traffic4.5%
Built-up3.1%
Other built-up11.7%
Recreation0.3%
Agriculture78%
Forest and nature0.5%
Water1.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 2500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
3,100 m
–
GP practice
3,700 m
–
Primary school
2,700 m
–
Daycare
2,500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Rotterdam average.
Schieveen has 340 inhabitants (2026), or 60 per km² (98% lower than in Rotterdam). Between 2024 and 2026 the population rose 3%, against no real change in Rotterdam. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Rotterdam was 63%, 15 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 18% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+3%
▲higher than Rotterdam (+0%)
Turnout, municipality of Rotterdam
63%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▲higher than Rotterdam (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
37%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (24%)
Never married
45%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (60%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲42 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (42%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
50%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (37%)
D66, share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
+3%
▲higher than Rotterdam (+0%)
Turnout, municipality of Rotterdam
63%
▼15 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+5%
▲higher than Rotterdam (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
37%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (24%)
Never married
45%
▼15 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (60%)
Dutch origin
84%
▲42 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (42%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
50%
▲13 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (37%)
D66, share of the vote
18%
▲1 percentage point higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2024 and 2026, to 340.
Residents, 2026
340
+3% since 2024
Rotterdam +0%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 60 residents per km², this buurt is 98% less densely populated than the municipality of Rotterdam.
Residents per km²60
Dwellings per km²26
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; 29.4 died per 1,000.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
37% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1530
15 to 2545
25 to 4555
45 to 65125
65 to 8055
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married155
Married145
Divorced25
Widowed20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
84% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands285
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)30
Outside Europe25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
50% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4110
Higher professional, university110
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Rotterdam; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 63% of eligible voters in Rotterdam voted. The largest party was D66 with 18% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RotterdamThe Netherlands
D66
18%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
14.9%
16.7%
VVD
10.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
17.1%
12.8%
CDA
7%
11.8%
JA21
5.7%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.4%
4.5%
BBB
0.7%
2.6%
Other
23%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Schieveen has an average of 1.6 cars per household, 2.3 times as high as in Rotterdam (0.7). 33% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 8 percentage points more than in Rotterdam (25%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
11%
▲11 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (0%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲2.3 times as high as Rotterdam (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲8 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
−1 pp
▼lower than Rotterdam (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▼1 percentage point lower than Rotterdam (91%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€633,000
▲59% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
11%
▲11 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (0%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
11%
▼8 percentage points lower than Rotterdam (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (27%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.6
▲2.3 times as high as Rotterdam (0.7)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
33%
▲8 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
−1 pp
▼lower than Rotterdam (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (3%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲2 percentage points higher than Rotterdam (2%)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▼1 percentage point lower than Rotterdam (91%)
Multi-family dwellings
5%
▼32 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€633,000
▲59% higher than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
95%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 30 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie10
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening30
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
33% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Rotterdam (2025).
Petrol67.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)32.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 33% to 33% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
33%▲ 8 percentage points above Rotterdam (25%)
+0 pp since 2024
Rotterdam +2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 230 passenger cars and 30 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars230
Motorcycles30
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (9%).
Residential89.9%
Assembly1.2%
Healthcare3.6%
Industrial8.9%
Education0.6%
Explanation
Based on 168 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
60 residents per km²: 89% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²60
NL 539▼ −89% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings5%
NL 37%▼ −86% vs NL
Average WOZ value€633,000
NL €398,000▲ +59% vs NL
Single-family dwellings95%
NL 63%▲ +51% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings84%
NL 57%▲ +47% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026