We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Roosendaal
Living in Minnebeek-Watermolen
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Roosendaal, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Minnebeek-Watermolen is €274,000, 15% lower than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 38%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 56% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€274,000
▼15% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
56%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Rented from a housing corporation
37%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Rented from another landlord
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1992–2005
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built before 1945
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
Average WOZ value
€274,000
▼15% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+38%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
56%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (62%)
Rented from a housing corporation
37%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Rented from another landlord
7%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1992–2005
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built before 1945
0%
▼12 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 38% between 2021 and 2025, to €274,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€274,000▼ 15% below Roosendaal
+38% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€261 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€261/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
104 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €274,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€120NL median
Water board levy€39–
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€21€24
Costs to set aside€141
Maintenance reserve€132–
Buildings insurance€9–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 252nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 104 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €274,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Minnebeek-Watermolen has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Groot Kroeven.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €274,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Minnebeek-Watermolen
274,000
1,366
–
Kroeven-Noordwest
330,000
525
–
Kroeven-Noordoost
303,000
585
–
Kroeven-Zuidwest
271,000
864
–
Kroeven-Zuidoost
275,000
1,102
–
De Krogten
330,000
715
–
Borteldonk
570,000
66
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Who owns the homes
The largest group: owner-occupied, 56% of homes.
Owner-occupied
Minnebeek-Watermolen
56%
Roosendaal
62%
the Netherlands
57%
Rented from a housing corporation
Minnebeek-Watermolen
37%
Roosendaal
27%
the Netherlands
28%
Rented from another landlord
Minnebeek-Watermolen
7%
Roosendaal
10%
the Netherlands
14%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
What kind of homes
The largest group: single-family houses, 87% of homes.
Single-family houses
Minnebeek-Watermolen
87%
Roosendaal
74%
the Netherlands
63%
Apartments and other multi-family homes
Minnebeek-Watermolen
13%
Roosendaal
26%
the Netherlands
37%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a rounded share of the dwelling stock, so the parts do not always add up to 100.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
99% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 19450.4%
1965-19740.4%
1975-199199%
1992-20050.2%
2006-20150.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,366 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Roosendaal average.
In 2025, 31 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Minnebeek-Watermolen, 42% lower than in Roosendaal (53). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 18%, against a fall of 9% in Roosendaal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
31
▼42% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-18%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.5
▼53% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
31
▼42% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-18%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.5
▼53% lower than Roosendaal (3.2)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Minnebeek-Watermolen registered 31 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 53 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Minnebeek-Watermolen31
The municipality of Roosendaal53
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Minnebeek-Watermolen is 'Theft and burglary': 10.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 26.0 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Minnebeek-WatermolenRoosendaal
Theft and burglary10.3
Roosendaal 26.0▼ −60% vs Roosendaal
Fraud and scams6.2
Roosendaal 5.1▲ +22% vs Roosendaal
Vandalism and public order5.2
Roosendaal 6.1▼ −15% vs Roosendaal
Traffic4.8
Roosendaal 7.7▼ −38% vs Roosendaal
Violence and threats3.1
Roosendaal 5.3▼ −42% vs Roosendaal
Other and withheld1.7
Roosendaal 2.6▼ −35% vs Roosendaal
Environmental0.0
Roosendaal 0.2≈ Roosendaal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Minnebeek-Watermolen registered 6 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Roosendaal average; green space is above the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 68% of adults in Minnebeek-Watermolen rate their own health as good, 1 percentage point less than in Roosendaal. More adults smoke (20% against 18%), more are overweight (60% against 58%), more feel lonely (54% against 52%) and more report anxiety or depression (51% against 49%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Minnebeek-Watermolen, covering 74% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 20% of the area, 10 percentage points above the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Overweight
60%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (58%)
Lonely
54%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (52%)
Smokes
20%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (49%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲55 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Recreation, share of the area
20%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Overweight
60%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (58%)
Lonely
54%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (52%)
Smokes
20%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (18%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (49%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲55 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Recreation, share of the area
20%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Health
An estimated 68% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
68.3%
69.3%
Smokes
20.2%
18%
Excessive drinking
5.2%
5.7%
Overweight
60.1%
57.5%
Lonely
54.1%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
51%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
43.2%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
20% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic3.7%
Built-up74.1%
Recreation20.4%
Water1.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A gp practice lies here at an average road distance of 1400 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,100 m
–
GP practice
1,400 m
–
Primary school
2,200 m
–
Daycare
2,000 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Minnebeek-Watermolen has 2,865 inhabitants (2026), or 5,375 per km² (7.3 times as high as in Roosendaal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 1%, against a rise of 1% in Roosendaal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (25%)
Never married
50%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
71%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 25 to 45
28%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (25%)
Never married
50%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
71%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 1% between 2021 and 2026, to 2,865.
Residents, 2026
2,865
-1% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 5,375 residents per km², this buurt is 7.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²5,375
Dwellings per km²2,577.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 6.9 children were born per 1,000 residents; 5.2 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15410
15 to 25325
25 to 45810
45 to 65805
65 to 80455
80 and over55
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are never married.
Never married1,425
Married1,065
Divorced295
Widowed85
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
71% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,020
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)360
Outside Europe480
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
47% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1540
Havo, vwo, mbo2-41,110
Higher professional, university690
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Minnebeek-Watermolen has an average of 1.1 cars per household, about the same as in Roosendaal (1.1). 17% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Industry and energy, share of businesses
22%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
=about the same as Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Rented from another landlord
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€274,000
▼31% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
22%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (16%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
=about the same as Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
90%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (0%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Rented from another landlord
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Average WOZ value
€274,000
▼31% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Business establishments by sector
Nijverheid en energie is the largest sector, with 45 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca30
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening45
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg45
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
17% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol83.4%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)16.6%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 12% to 17% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
17%▼ 4 percentage points below Roosendaal (21%)
+5 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,445 passenger cars and 120 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,445
Motorcycles120
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
90% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (0.3%).
Residential89.9%
Assembly0.1%
Healthcare0.3%
Other9.8%
Explanation
Based on 1,520 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
5,375 residents per km²: 10.0 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²5,375
NL 539▲ +897% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Rented from another landlord7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Average WOZ value€274,000
NL €398,000▼ −31% vs NL
Single-family dwellings87%
NL 63%▲ +38% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026