The average WOZ value in Borteldonk is €570,000, 76% higher than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 30%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 91% of the homes are owner-occupied, 29 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€570,000
▲76% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+30%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲29 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
9%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1945–1964
12%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Average WOZ value
€570,000
▲76% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+30%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲29 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
9%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
2%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1992–2005
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1945–1964
12%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 30% between 2021 and 2025, to €570,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€570,000▲ 76% above Roosendaal
+30% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€423 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€423/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
199 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €570,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€151NL median
Water board levy€48–
Property tax (OZB)€43€50
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Costs to set aside€272
Maintenance reserve€254–
Buildings insurance€18–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 197th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 199 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €570,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Borteldonk has the highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Groot Kroeven.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €570,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Borteldonk
570,000
66
–
Kroeven-Noordwest
330,000
525
–
Kroeven-Noordoost
303,000
585
–
Kroeven-Zuidwest
271,000
864
–
Kroeven-Zuidoost
275,000
1,102
–
Minnebeek-Watermolen
274,000
1,366
–
De Krogten
330,000
715
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 91% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied91%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
44% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 194543.9%
1945-196412.1%
1965-19741.5%
1975-199122.7%
1992-200512.1%
2006-20153%
2016 and later4.5%
Explanation
Based on 66 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Borteldonk has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 7 crimes were registered, against 18 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
7
▼down from 18 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
7
▼down from 18 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
7 crimes were registered in Borteldonk in 2025 (18 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
7
down from 18 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Borteldonk is 'Theft and burglary': 3 in 2025.
Theft and burglary3
Vandalism and public order1
Violence and threats1
Fraud and scams1
Traffic1
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Borteldonk registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Roosendaal average; green space is above the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 79% of adults in Borteldonk rate their own health as good, 10 percentage points more than in Roosendaal. Fewer adults feel lonely (41% against 52%), fewer report anxiety or depression (40% against 49%) and fewer smoke (12% against 18%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (51% against 43%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Borteldonk, covering 81% of the area, against 65% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 12% of the area, 2 percentage points above the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
41%
▼11 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
81%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
10%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
79%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
41%
▼11 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
40%
▼9 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Built-up, share of the area
2%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Agriculture, share of the area
81%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
10%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Health
An estimated 79% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
78.8%
69.3%
Smokes
11.8%
18%
Excessive drinking
6.5%
5.7%
Overweight
52%
57.5%
Lonely
41.3%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.1%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
51.2%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
12% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic4.6%
Built-up1.8%
Recreation1.8%
Agriculture80.7%
Forest and nature10.4%
Water0.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,400 m
–
GP practice
2,400 m
–
Primary school
1,600 m
–
Daycare
1,600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Roosendaal average.
Borteldonk has 155 inhabitants (2026), or 56 per km² (92% lower than in Roosendaal). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
52%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
93%
▲24 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+3%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
28%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
52%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
93%
▲24 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 155.
Residents, 2026
155
+3% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 56 residents per km², this buurt is 92% less densely populated than the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²56
Dwellings per km²23.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
28% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2525
25 to 4535
45 to 6545
65 to 8035
80 and over5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
52% of residents are married.
Never married60
Married75
Divorced5
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
93% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands140
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Borteldonk has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 9% higher than in Roosendaal (1.1). 25% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
20%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲9% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
20%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (0%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
20%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
20%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲9% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
25%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+2 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
20%
▲16 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
87%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (0%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 5 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
25% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol75%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)25%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 23% to 25% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
25%▲ 4 percentage points above Roosendaal (21%)
+2 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 80 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars80
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
87% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (20%).
Residential86.8%
Retail2.6%
Office1.3%
Assembly1.3%
Industrial19.7%
Lodging1.3%
Other3.9%
Explanation
Based on 76 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
56 residents per km²: 90% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²56
NL 539▼ −90% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings91%
NL 57%▲ +60% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Average WOZ value€570,000
NL €398,000▲ +43% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026