The average WOZ value in Majoppeveld-Zuid is €479,000, 48% higher than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 16%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 88% of the homes are owner-occupied, 26 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€479,000
▲48% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+16%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲23 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Built before 1945
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Average WOZ value
€479,000
▲48% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+16%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲23 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Built before 1945
4%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (12%)
Built 1992–2005
13%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 16% between 2021 and 2025, to €479,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€479,000▲ 48% above Roosendaal
+16% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€487 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€487/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
254 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €479,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€141NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€36€42
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Costs to set aside€346
Maintenance reserve€323–
Buildings insurance€23–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 218th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 254 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €479,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Majoppeveld-Zuid has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Industriegebieden.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €479,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Majoppeveld-Zuid
479,000
68
–
Borchwerf-Noord
310,000
34
–
Borchwerf-Zuid
435,000
24
–
Majoppeveld-Noord
464,000
28
–
Vijfhuizenberg
514,000
84
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 88% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied88%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
60% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 19454.4%
1945-19641.5%
1965-197414.7%
1975-199160.3%
1992-200513.2%
2006-20155.9%
Explanation
Based on 68 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Majoppeveld-Zuid has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 60 crimes were registered, against 62 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
60
▼down from 62 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
60
▼down from 62 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
60 crimes were registered in Majoppeveld-Zuid in 2025 (62 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
60
down from 62 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Majoppeveld-Zuid is 'Theft and burglary': 36 in 2025.
Theft and burglary36
Violence and threats8
Traffic7
Vandalism and public order4
Fraud and scams4
Other and withheld1
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Majoppeveld-Zuid registered 16 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and 1 fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Roosendaal average; green space is below the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 76% of adults in Majoppeveld-Zuid rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points more than in Roosendaal. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (41% against 49%), fewer feel lonely (45% against 52%) and fewer are overweight (52% against 58%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (48% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Majoppeveld-Zuid, covering 70% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 2% of the area, 8 percentage points below the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Lonely
45%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Overweight
52%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (58%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
7%
▼58 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
70%
▲51 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Other built-up, share of the area
15%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
76%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
41%
▼8 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Lonely
45%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Overweight
52%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (58%)
Meets physical activity guideline
48%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (43%)
Agriculture, share of the area
7%
▼58 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
70%
▲51 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Other built-up, share of the area
15%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Health
An estimated 76% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
76.3%
69.3%
Smokes
14.7%
18%
Excessive drinking
7%
5.7%
Overweight
51.7%
57.5%
Lonely
45.2%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
40.9%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
48.2%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
2% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic5.8%
Built-up70.2%
Other built-up14.6%
Recreation2.3%
Agriculture7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 1700 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,800 m
–
GP practice
2,000 m
–
Primary school
1,700 m
–
Daycare
1,700 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Majoppeveld-Zuid has 155 inhabitants (2026), or 92 per km² (87% lower than in Roosendaal). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-6%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Never married
45%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-6%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
-1%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
32%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Never married
45%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (46%)
Dutch origin
74%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 6% between 2021 and 2026, to 155.
Residents, 2026
155
-6% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 92 residents per km², this buurt is 87% less densely populated than the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²92
Dwellings per km²40
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
32% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1525
15 to 2515
25 to 4530
45 to 6550
65 to 8025
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
45% of residents are never married.
Never married70
Married60
Divorced15
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
74% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands115
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)20
Outside Europe20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
40% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 19 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
38%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
2%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲20 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
17%
▼66 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
66%
▲62 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Retail, share of addresses
12%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (2%)
Residents per km²
92
▼83% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
38%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
2%
▼15 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Business services, share of businesses
19%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
41%
▲20 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
17%
▼66 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Industrial, share of addresses
66%
▲62 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Retail, share of addresses
12%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (2%)
Residents per km²
92
▼83% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 90 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie45
Handel en horeca90
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie25
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening45
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
41% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol58.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)41.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 38% to 41% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
41%▲ 20 percentage points above Roosendaal (21%)
+3 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 235 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars235
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
17% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (66%).
Residential17%
Retail11.5%
Office5.5%
Assembly1.5%
Healthcare0.2%
Industrial65.8%
Lodging0.5%
Sports0.8%
Other6.5%
Explanation
Based on 400 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Residents per km²92
NL 539▼ −83% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings88%
NL 57%▲ +54% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Average WOZ value€479,000
NL €398,000▲ +20% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025