The average WOZ value in Majoppeveld-Noord is €464,000, 44% higher than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 18%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 89% of the homes are owner-occupied, 27 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€464,000
▲44% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+18%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲27 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲22 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
11%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1945–1964
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (16%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
Average WOZ value
€464,000
▲44% higher than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+18%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲27 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
11%
▲1 percentage point higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲22 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
11%
▼6 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 1945–1964
21%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (16%)
Built 2006–2015
4%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (6%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 18% between 2021 and 2025, to €464,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€464,000▲ 44% above Roosendaal
+18% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€426 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€426/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
209 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €464,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€140NL median
Water board levy€45–
Property tax (OZB)€35€41
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Costs to set aside€286
Maintenance reserve€267–
Buildings insurance€19–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 222nd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 209 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €464,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Majoppeveld-Noord has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Industriegebieden.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €464,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Majoppeveld-Noord
464,000
28
–
Borchwerf-Noord
310,000
34
–
Borchwerf-Zuid
435,000
24
–
Majoppeveld-Zuid
479,000
68
–
Vijfhuizenberg
514,000
84
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 89% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied89%
Private rent11%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
96% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes96%
Multi-family homes4%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
36% of dwellings were built between 1992 and 2005, against 17% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
1945-196421.4%
1965-197410.7%
1975-199128.6%
1992-200535.7%
2006-20153.6%
Explanation
Based on 28 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Majoppeveld-Noord has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 67 crimes were registered, against 46 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
67
▲up from 46 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
67
▲up from 46 in 2021
Home burglary
2
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
67 crimes were registered in Majoppeveld-Noord in 2025 (46 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
67
up from 46 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Majoppeveld-Noord is 'Theft and burglary': 42 in 2025.
Theft and burglary42
Traffic9
Vandalism and public order7
Violence and threats7
Fraud and scams2
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Majoppeveld-Noord registered 10 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is below the Roosendaal average.
Built-up land is the largest land use in Majoppeveld-Noord, covering 74% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼59 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲55 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Other built-up, share of the area
12%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
6%
▼59 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲55 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Other built-up, share of the area
12%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Land use
0% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic7.1%
Built-up74.1%
Other built-up12.5%
Agriculture6.2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 1300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,300 m
–
GP practice
1,500 m
–
Primary school
1,400 m
–
Daycare
1,400 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.2
GP practices
–
0.3
Daycares
–
0.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Majoppeveld-Noord has 55 inhabitants (2026), or 48 per km² (93% lower than in Roosendaal). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-15%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
40%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
56%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
64%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-15%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
40%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
56%
▲17 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
64%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (69%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 15% between 2021 and 2026, to 55.
Residents, 2026
55
-15% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 48 residents per km², this buurt is 93% less densely populated than the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²48
Dwellings per km²25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
40% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 155
15 to 255
25 to 4510
45 to 6520
65 to 8010
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
56% of residents are married.
Never married15
Married25
Divorced5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
64% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands35
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
50% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 29 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
55%
▲36 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
3%
▼14 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Business services, share of businesses
13%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
50%
▲29 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+12 pp
▲higher than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
79%
▲75 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
11%
▼72 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Retail, share of addresses
9%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
4%
▼33 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
55%
▲36 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
3%
▼14 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Business services, share of businesses
13%
▼10 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (23%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
50%
▲29 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+12 pp
▲higher than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
79%
▲75 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
11%
▼72 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Retail, share of addresses
9%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
4%
▼33 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
89%
▲32 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Single-family dwellings
96%
▲33 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 105 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca105
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening25
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
50% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol50%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)50%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 38% to 50% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
50%▲ 29 percentage points above Roosendaal (21%)
+12 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 160 passenger cars and 10 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars160
Motorcycles10
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
11% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (79%).
Residential10.5%
Retail9.4%
Office4.9%
Assembly0.4%
Healthcare0.4%
Industrial78.6%
Sports0.4%
Other6.4%
Explanation
Based on 266 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
48 residents per km²: 91% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²48
NL 539▼ −91% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings4%
NL 37%▼ −89% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings89%
NL 57%▲ +56% vs NL
Single-family dwellings96%
NL 63%▲ +52% vs NL
Private rent11%
NL 14%▼ −21% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026