The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Roosendaal, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Kortendijk C is €316,000, 2% lower than in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 36%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 68% of the homes are owner-occupied, 6 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€316,000
▼2% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+36%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
68%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2006–2015
11%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Average WOZ value
€316,000
▼2% lower than Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+36%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
68%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
29%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
3%
▼7 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲13 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1965–1974
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2006–2015
11%
▲5 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (6%)
Built 2016 and later
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 36% between 2021 and 2025, to €316,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€316,000▼ 2% below Roosendaal
+36% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€295 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€295/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
125 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €316,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€125NL median
Water board levy€41–
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Property tax (OZB)€24€28
Costs to set aside€170
Maintenance reserve€159–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 243rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 125 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €316,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Kortendijk C has the lowest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Kortendijk.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €316,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Kortendijk C
316,000
1,479
–
Kortendijk A
361,000
1,833
–
Kortendijk L
321,000
1,069
–
Landerije
748,000
342
–
Bakkersberg-Langendijk
797,000
34
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 68% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied68%
Social housing29%
Private rent3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
87% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes87%
Multi-family homes13%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
89% of dwellings were built between 1975 and 1991, against 26% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
1965-19740.1%
1975-199189.2%
2006-201510.7%
2016 and later0.1%
Explanation
Based on 1,479 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Roosendaal average.
In 2025, 34 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Kortendijk C, 36% lower than in Roosendaal (53). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 13%, against a fall of 9% in Roosendaal. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
34
▼36% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-13%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.5
▲41% higher than Roosendaal (3.2)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
34
▼36% lower than Roosendaal (53)
Change since 2021
-13%
▼lower than Roosendaal (-9%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.5
▲41% higher than Roosendaal (3.2)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Kortendijk C registered 34 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 53 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Kortendijk C34
The municipality of Roosendaal53
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Kortendijk C is 'Theft and burglary': 14.1 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 26.0 in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Kortendijk CRoosendaal
Theft and burglary14.1
Roosendaal 26.0▼ −46% vs Roosendaal
Vandalism and public order5.4
Roosendaal 6.1▼ −11% vs Roosendaal
Violence and threats4.8
Roosendaal 5.3▼ −9% vs Roosendaal
Fraud and scams4.2
Roosendaal 5.1▼ −18% vs Roosendaal
Traffic3.8
Roosendaal 7.7▼ −51% vs Roosendaal
Other and withheld1.3
Roosendaal 2.6▼ −50% vs Roosendaal
Environmental0.0
Roosendaal 0.2≈ Roosendaal
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Kortendijk C registered 8 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Roosendaal average; green space is above the Roosendaal average.
An estimated 71% of adults in Kortendijk C rate their own health as good, 2 percentage points more than in Roosendaal. Fewer adults feel lonely (49% against 52%), fewer report anxiety or depression (46% against 49%) and fewer smoke (16% against 18%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (44% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Kortendijk C, covering 75% of the area, against 19% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 17% of the area, 7 percentage points above the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
17%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
49%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Overweight
58%
=about the same as Roosendaal (58%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
75%
▲56 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Recreation, share of the area
17%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
71%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
17%
▲7 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
More figures
Lonely
49%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (52%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (49%)
Smokes
16%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (18%)
Overweight
58%
=about the same as Roosendaal (58%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼65 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
75%
▲56 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (19%)
Recreation, share of the area
17%
▲14 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Health
An estimated 71% of adults rate their own health as good, against 69% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Roosendaal
Good self-rated health
70.8%
69.3%
Smokes
16.3%
18%
Excessive drinking
5.5%
5.7%
Overweight
58.3%
57.5%
Lonely
49.3%
51.7%
Anxiety or depression feelings
46.5%
48.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
44.1%
43.4%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
17% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic5.3%
Built-up75%
Recreation17.1%
Water2.6%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 800 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,200 m
–
GP practice
900 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
800 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.8
GP practices
–
0.6
Daycares
–
1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Roosendaal.
Kortendijk C has 3,125 inhabitants (2026), or 4,185 per km² (5.7 times as high as in Roosendaal). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 3%, against a rise of 1% in Roosendaal. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
42%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
73%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-3%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
24%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
42%
▲3 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
73%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
42%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 3% between 2021 and 2026, to 3,125.
Residents, 2026
3,125
-3% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 4,185 residents per km², this buurt is 5.7 times as densely populated as the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²4,185
Dwellings per km²1,972
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 9.6 children were born per 1,000 residents; 22.4 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
24% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15475
15 to 25320
25 to 45700
45 to 65765
65 to 80635
80 and over235
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are married.
Never married1,250
Married1,325
Divorced305
Widowed245
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
74% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands2,300
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)285
Outside Europe545
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
42% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1620
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4940
Higher professional, university660
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Kortendijk C has an average of 1.2 cars per household, 9% higher than in Roosendaal (1.1). 17% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 4 percentage points less than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲9% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
23%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (17%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
15%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
11%
▲4 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (7%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.2
▲9% higher than Roosendaal (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
17%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
=about the same as Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
93%
▲10 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (83%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Assembly, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Roosendaal (1%)
Private rent
3%
▼11 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
13%
▼24 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Single-family dwellings
87%
▲24 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca35
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie25
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening50
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg55
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
17% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol82.7%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)17.3%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 13% to 17% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
17%▼ 4 percentage points below Roosendaal (21%)
+4 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,560 passenger cars and 115 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,560
Motorcycles115
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
93% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (0.4%).
Residential93.1%
Office0.1%
Assembly0.4%
Education0.2%
Sports0.1%
Other6.2%
Explanation
Based on 1,588 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
4,185 residents per km²: 7.8 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²4,185
NL 539▲ +676% vs NL
Private rent3%
NL 14%▼ −79% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings13%
NL 37%▼ −65% vs NL
Single-family dwellings87%
NL 63%▲ +38% vs NL
Average WOZ value€316,000
NL €398,000▼ −21% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026