The average WOZ value in Bakkersberg-Langendijk is €797,000, 2.5 times as high as in Roosendaal (€323,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 13%, against a rise of 34% in Roosendaal. 88% of the homes are owner-occupied, 26 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (62%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€797,000
▲2.5 times as high as Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+13%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼14 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 1965–1974
15%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2016 and later
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Average WOZ value
€797,000
▲2.5 times as high as Roosendaal (€323,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+13%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+34%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (62%)
Social housing
0%
▼27 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (27%)
Private rent
12%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (10%)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲26 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (74%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼14 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (26%)
Built 1965–1974
15%
▼2 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Built 2016 and later
6%
▲2 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 13% between 2021 and 2025, to €797,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€797,000▲ 2.5 times as high as Roosendaal
+13% since 2021
Roosendaal +34%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€541 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€541/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
269 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €797,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€174NL median
Property tax (OZB)€60€70
Water board levy€54–
Sewage levy€33€22
Waste levy€27€27
Costs to set aside€367
Maintenance reserve€343–
Buildings insurance€24–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Roosendaal's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 175th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 269 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €797,000.
Levies: Roosendaal's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Bakkersberg-Langendijk has the highest WOZ value of the 5 buurten in Kortendijk.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €797,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Bakkersberg-Langendijk
797,000
34
–
Kortendijk A
361,000
1,833
–
Kortendijk C
316,000
1,479
–
Kortendijk L
321,000
1,069
–
Landerije
748,000
342
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 88% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied88%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
100% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes100%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
32% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 12% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Before 194532.4%
1945-196417.6%
1965-197414.7%
1975-199111.8%
1992-200517.6%
2016 and later5.9%
Explanation
Based on 34 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Bakkersberg-Langendijk has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 9 crimes were registered, against 6 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
9
▲up from 6 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
9
▲up from 6 in 2021
Home burglary
1
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
9 crimes were registered in Bakkersberg-Langendijk in 2025 (6 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
9
up from 6 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Bakkersberg-Langendijk is 'Theft and burglary': 5 in 2025.
Theft and burglary5
Vandalism and public order2
Traffic2
Violence and threats0
Fraud and scams0
Environmental0
Other and withheld0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Bakkersberg-Langendijk registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is about the Roosendaal average.
Agricultural land is the largest land use in Bakkersberg-Langendijk, covering 85% of the area, against 65% in Roosendaal. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 10% of the area, in line with the 10% in Roosendaal.
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
10%
=about the same as Roosendaal (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
85%
▲20 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Traffic, share of the area
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
10%
=about the same as Roosendaal (10%)
Agriculture, share of the area
85%
▲20 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (65%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (19%)
Traffic, share of the area
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (4%)
Land use
10% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 10% in the municipality of Roosendaal.
Traffic1.5%
Built-up0.4%
Other built-up3.3%
Recreation2.9%
Agriculture84.9%
Forest and nature7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 2000 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
2,000 m
–
GP practice
2,100 m
–
Primary school
2,100 m
–
Daycare
2,100 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.2
GP practices
–
0.3
Daycares
–
0.1
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Roosendaal average.
Bakkersberg-Langendijk has 95 inhabitants (2026), or 33 per km² (96% lower than in Roosendaal). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Roosendaal was 73%, 5 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 22% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+12%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
50%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+12%
▲higher than Roosendaal (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Roosendaal
73%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Roosendaal (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
33%
▲6 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (27%)
Married
50%
▲11 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (39%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲19 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (69%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (43%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
22%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 12% between 2021 and 2026, to 95.
Residents, 2026
95
+12% since 2021
Roosendaal +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 33 residents per km², this buurt is 96% less densely populated than the municipality of Roosendaal.
Residents per km²33
Dwellings per km²12.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
33% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1510
15 to 2510
25 to 4510
45 to 6525
65 to 8020
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
50% of residents are married.
Never married30
Married45
Divorced5
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands75
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
38% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo120
Havo, vwo, mbo2-430
Higher professional, university30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2023
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Roosendaal; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 73% of eligible voters in Roosendaal voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 22% of the valid votes.
Municipality of RoosendaalThe Netherlands
D66
14.9%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
21.5%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
8.8%
12.8%
CDA
12%
11.8%
JA21
7.3%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.5%
4.5%
BBB
2.2%
2.6%
Other
11.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
42% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 21 percentage points more than in Roosendaal (21%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
25%
▲22 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
42%
▲21 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−4 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
9%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
79%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Average WOZ value
€797,000
▲2.0 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
25%
▲22 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (3%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
0%
▼17 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (17%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (16%)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
42%
▲21 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (21%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
−4 pp
▼lower than Roosendaal (+4 pp)
Assembly, share of addresses
9%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (1%)
Industrial, share of addresses
12%
▲8 percentage points higher than Roosendaal (4%)
Residential, share of addresses
79%
▼4 percentage points lower than Roosendaal (83%)
Average WOZ value
€797,000
▲2.0 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Single-family dwellings
100%
▲37 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
88%
▲31 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 5 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie0
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg0
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Passenger cars by fuel type
42% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 21% in the municipality of Roosendaal (2025).
Petrol58.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)41.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 45% to 42% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
42%▲ 21 percentage points above Roosendaal (21%)
-3 pp since 2021
Roosendaal +4 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 60 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars60
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
79% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (12%).
Residential79.1%
Assembly9.3%
Healthcare2.3%
Industrial11.6%
Lodging2.3%
Sports2.3%
Other7%
Explanation
Based on 43 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
33 residents per km²: 94% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²33
NL 539▼ −94% vs NL
Average WOZ value€797,000
NL €398,000▲ +100% vs NL
Single-family dwellings100%
NL 63%▲ +59% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings88%
NL 57%▲ +54% vs NL
Private rent12%
NL 14%▼ −14% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026