The average WOZ value in Julianapark is €799,000, 2.2 times as high as in Rijswijk (ZH.) (€358,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 29%, against a rise of 32% in Rijswijk (ZH.). 78% of the homes are owner-occupied, 29 percentage points more than in Rijswijk (ZH.) (49%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€799,000
▲2.2 times as high as Rijswijk (ZH.) (€358,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+29%
▼lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+32%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
78%
▲29 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (49%)
Social housing
0%
▼32 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Private rent
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (19%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲65 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (29%)
Built before 1945
37%
▲22 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (15%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼22 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (23%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼18 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (22%)
Average WOZ value
€799,000
▲2.2 times as high as Rijswijk (ZH.) (€358,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+29%
▼lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+32%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
78%
▲29 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (49%)
Social housing
0%
▼32 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Private rent
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (19%)
Single-family dwellings
94%
▲65 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (29%)
Built before 1945
37%
▲22 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (15%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼22 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (23%)
Built 1965–1974
4%
▼18 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (22%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 29% between 2021 and 2025, to €799,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€799,000▲ 2.2 times as high as Rijswijk (ZH.)
+29% since 2021
Rijswijk (ZH.) +32%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€433 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€433/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
198 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €799,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€163NL median
Property tax (OZB)€55€70
Water board levy€54–
Waste levy€36€27
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€270
Maintenance reserve€252–
Buildings insurance€18–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Rijswijk (ZH.)'s OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 78th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 198 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €799,000.
Levies: Rijswijk (ZH.)'s own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Julianapark has the highest WOZ value of the 3 buurten in 04.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €799,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Julianapark
799,000
32
–
Huis te Lande
357,000
624
–
Te Werve
273,000
2,120
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 78% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied78%
Private rent22%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
94% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes94%
Multi-family homes6%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
55% of dwellings were built in 2016 or later, against 11% in the municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.).
Before 194536.6%
1945-19641.4%
1965-19744.2%
1975-19912.8%
2016 and later54.9%
Explanation
Based on 71 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Julianapark has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 61 crimes were registered, against 54 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
61
▲up from 54 in 2021
Home burglary
5
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
61
▲up from 54 in 2021
Home burglary
5
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
61 crimes were registered in Julianapark in 2025 (54 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
61
up from 54 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Julianapark is 'Theft and burglary': 25 in 2025.
Theft and burglary25
Other and withheld10
Violence and threats9
Traffic9
Vandalism and public order6
Fraud and scams1
Environmental1
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Julianapark registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 3 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Green space is above the Rijswijk (ZH.) average.
Recreational land is the largest land use in Julianapark, covering 76% of the area, against 32% in Rijswijk (ZH.). Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 76% of the area, 44 percentage points above the 32% in Rijswijk (ZH.).
Key figures
Green (parks, sport, nature)
76%
▲44 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Recreation, share of the area
76%
▲44 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Built-up, share of the area
15%
▼37 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (52%)
Traffic, share of the area
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (7%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
76%
▲44 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Recreation, share of the area
76%
▲44 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (32%)
Built-up, share of the area
15%
▼37 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (52%)
Traffic, share of the area
4%
▼3 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (7%)
Land use
76% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 32% in the municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.).
Traffic3.6%
Built-up14.5%
Recreation76.4%
Water5.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,000 m
–
GP practice
800 m
–
Primary school
800 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.5
GP practices
–
2.6
Daycares
–
3.3
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Rijswijk (ZH.) average.
Julianapark has 165 inhabitants (2026), or 318 per km² (93% lower than in Rijswijk (ZH.)). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.) was 74%, 4 percentage points below the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 19% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+43%
▲higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.)
74%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+8%)
Aged 25 to 45
27%
▼2 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (29%)
Never married
52%
▼1 percentage point lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (53%)
Dutch origin
55%
=about the same as Rijswijk (ZH.) (55%)
D66, share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+43%
▲higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+12%)
Turnout, municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.)
74%
▼4 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+8%)
Aged 25 to 45
27%
▼2 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (29%)
Never married
52%
▼1 percentage point lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (53%)
Dutch origin
55%
=about the same as Rijswijk (ZH.) (55%)
D66, share of the vote
19%
▲2 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 43% between 2021 and 2026, to 165.
Residents, 2026
165
+43% since 2021
Rijswijk (ZH.) +12%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 318 residents per km², this buurt is 93% less densely populated than the municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.).
Residents per km²318
Dwellings per km²61.5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 1530
15 to 2525
25 to 4545
45 to 6540
65 to 8015
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
52% of residents are never married.
Never married85
Married65
Divorced10
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
55% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands90
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Outside Europe65
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.); there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 74% of eligible voters in Rijswijk (ZH.) voted. The largest party was D66 with 19% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.)The Netherlands
D66
19.4%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
17.9%
16.7%
VVD
14.1%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
14.3%
12.8%
CDA
9%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4%
4.5%
BBB
1.1%
2.6%
Other
14%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Julianapark has an average of 0.7 cars per household, 22% lower than in Rijswijk (ZH.) (0.9). 43% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 18 percentage points more than in Rijswijk (ZH.) (25%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
33%
▲14 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (28%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.7
▼22% lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (0.9)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
43%
▲18 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+18 pp
▲higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
76%
▼12 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (88%)
Assembly, share of addresses
11%
▲10 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (1%)
Sports, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (0%)
Average WOZ value
€799,000
▲2.0 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Residents per km²
318
▼41% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
22%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
33%
▲14 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (19%)
Business services, share of businesses
17%
▼11 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (28%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (10%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.7
▼22% lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (0.9)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
43%
▲18 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (25%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+18 pp
▲higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (+6 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
76%
▼12 percentage points lower than Rijswijk (ZH.) (88%)
Assembly, share of addresses
11%
▲10 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (1%)
Sports, share of addresses
2%
▲2 percentage points higher than Rijswijk (ZH.) (0%)
Average WOZ value
€799,000
▲2.0 times as high as the Netherlands (€398,000)
Residents per km²
318
▼41% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
22%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg10
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
43% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 25% in the municipality of Rijswijk (ZH.) (2025).
Petrol57.1%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)42.9%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 25% to 43% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 35 passenger cars and 5 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars35
Motorcycles5
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
76% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is assembly (11%).
Residential75.5%
Assembly10.6%
Healthcare2.1%
Industrial1.1%
Education2.1%
Sports2.1%
Other7.4%
Explanation
Based on 94 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
6% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings6%
NL 37%▼ −84% vs NL
Average WOZ value€799,000
NL €398,000▲ +101% vs NL
Residents per km²318
NL 539▼ −41% vs NL
Private rent22%
NL 14%▲ +57% vs NL
Single-family dwellings94%
NL 63%▲ +49% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025