We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Living in Oud-Delfgauw
The population is growing slower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp, and registered crime per resident is lower.
Homes cost less than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
The average WOZ value in Oud-Delfgauw is €492,000, 6% lower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 46%, against a rise of 43% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. 70% of the homes are owner-occupied, 2 percentage points less than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€492,000
▼6% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+46%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%)
Social housing
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (20%)
Private rent
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (9%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲14 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (76%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼20 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (30%)
Built 1945–1964
25%
▲19 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (6%)
Built 2016 and later
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (14%)
Average WOZ value
€492,000
▼6% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+46%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
70%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%)
Social housing
18%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (20%)
Private rent
12%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (9%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲14 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (76%)
Built 1992–2005
10%
▼20 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (30%)
Built 1945–1964
25%
▲19 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (6%)
Built 2016 and later
6%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 46% between 2021 and 2025, to €492,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€492,000▼ 6% below Pijnacker-Nootdorp
+46% since 2021
Pijnacker-Nootdorp +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€298 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€298/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
123 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €492,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€130NL median
Water board levy€46–
Waste levy€34€27
Property tax (OZB)€32€43
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€168
Maintenance reserve€157–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Pijnacker-Nootdorp's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 69th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 123 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €492,000.
Levies: Pijnacker-Nootdorp's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Oud-Delfgauw has the 2nd-lowest WOZ value of the 6 buurten in Delfgauw.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €492,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Oud-Delfgauw
492,000
795
–
Emerald Noord
524,000
591
–
Emerald Centrum
480,000
1,156
–
Emerald Zuid
520,000
720
–
Zuidpolder Delfgauw
785,000
116
–
Noordpolder Delfgauw
947,000
77
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 70% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied70%
Social housing18%
Private rent12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
90% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes90%
Multi-family homes10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
27% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 5% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Before 194526.5%
1945-196424.9%
1965-197410.9%
1975-19916%
1992-200510.3%
2006-201515.8%
2016 and later5.5%
Explanation
Based on 796 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
In 2025, 15 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Oud-Delfgauw, 48% lower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 14%, against a rise of 2% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼48% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29)
Change since 2021
-14%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+2%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.7
▼19% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
15
▼48% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29)
Change since 2021
-14%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+2%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
1.7
▼19% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Oud-Delfgauw registered 15 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 29 in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Oud-Delfgauw15
The municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp29
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Oud-Delfgauw is 'Fraud and scams': 6.3 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 3.9 in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Oud-DelfgauwPijnacker-Nootdorp
Fraud and scams6.3
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 3.9▲ +62% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Vandalism and public order2.9
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 2.9≈ Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Violence and threats2.4
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 2.8▼ −14% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Traffic1.9
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 5.1▼ −63% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Theft and burglary1.0
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 12.9▼ −92% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Environmental0.0
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 0.1≈ Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Other and withheld0.0
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 1.5▼ −100% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Oud-Delfgauw registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health about average; green space is below the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Oud-Delfgauw rate their own health as good, about the same as in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. More adults meet the physical activity guideline (52% against 48%), more smoke (15% against 13%) and more report anxiety or depression (46% against 44%), but fewer are overweight (46% against 49%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Oud-Delfgauw, covering 74% of the area, against 24% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 6% of the area, 6 percentage points below the 12% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (12%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
52%
▲4 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Overweight
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (49%)
Smokes
15%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (13%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (44%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲50 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (24%)
Agriculture, share of the area
11%
▼43 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
6%
▼6 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (12%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
52%
▲4 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Overweight
46%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (49%)
Smokes
15%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (13%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
46%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (44%)
Built-up, share of the area
74%
▲50 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (24%)
Agriculture, share of the area
11%
▼43 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 78% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Good self-rated health
77.6%
78.2%
Smokes
14.9%
12.7%
Excessive drinking
4.9%
4.4%
Overweight
46.4%
48.9%
Lonely
42.2%
42.9%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.7%
44.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
52%
47.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
6% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Traffic5.7%
Built-up74.3%
Recreation5.7%
Agriculture11.4%
Water2.9%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A primary school lies here at an average road distance of 600 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,200 m
–
GP practice
1,000 m
–
Primary school
600 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0.4
Daycares
–
1.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
Oud-Delfgauw has 2,045 inhabitants (2026), or 6,099 per km² (3.8 times as high as in Pijnacker-Nootdorp). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 2%, against a rise of 6% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (30%)
Never married
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Dutch origin
76%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (73%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
40%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (40%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+5%)
Aged 45 to 65
29%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (30%)
Never married
51%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Dutch origin
76%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (73%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
40%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (40%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 2% between 2021 and 2026, to 2,045.
Residents, 2026
2,045
+2% since 2021
Pijnacker-Nootdorp +6%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 6,099 residents per km², this buurt is 3.8 times as densely populated as the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Residents per km²6,099
Dwellings per km²2,338.2
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 4.8 children were born per 1,000 residents; 4.8 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
29% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15335
15 to 25335
25 to 45455
45 to 65585
65 to 80260
80 and over75
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
51% of residents are never married.
Never married1,045
Married815
Divorced110
Widowed70
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
76% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,550
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)220
Outside Europe280
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
40% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1350
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4590
Higher professional, university620
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Pijnacker-Nootdorp voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Pijnacker-NootdorpThe Netherlands
D66
20.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10.1%
12.8%
CDA
13.3%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.9%
4.5%
BBB
1.6%
2.6%
Other
9.9%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Oud-Delfgauw has an average of 0.9 cars per household, 25% lower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2). 26% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), about the same as in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%).
Key figures
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (19%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (5%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
▼25% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+12 pp
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
10%
▼27 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
18%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲27 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Government, education and care, share of businesses
22%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (19%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
2%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (5%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Cars per household (2025)
0.9
▼25% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
26%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+12 pp
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+11 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
94%
▲4 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (90%)
Industrial, share of addresses
1%
▼3 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2%)
Multi-family dwellings
10%
▼27 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
18%
▼10 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Single-family dwellings
90%
▲27 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (63%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 65 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca30
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie20
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening65
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg50
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
26% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2025).
Petrol73.6%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)26.4%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 26% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
26%– about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%)
+12 pp since 2021
Pijnacker-Nootdorp +11 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 875 passenger cars and 85 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars875
Motorcycles85
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
94% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (0.9%).
Residential94.2%
Retail0.7%
Office0.2%
Assembly0.5%
Healthcare0.6%
Industrial0.9%
Lodging0.1%
Other4.3%
Explanation
Based on 845 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
6,099 residents per km²: 11 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²6,099
NL 539▲ +1032% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings10%
NL 37%▼ −73% vs NL
Social housing18%
NL 28%▼ −36% vs NL
Single-family dwellings90%
NL 63%▲ +43% vs NL
Average WOZ value€492,000
NL €398,000▲ +24% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026