We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Living in Keijzershof Boszoom
The population is growing slower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp, and registered crime per resident is lower.
Homes cost more than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
The average WOZ value in Keijzershof Boszoom is €548,000, 4% higher than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 45%, against a rise of 43% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. 59% of the homes are owner-occupied, 13 percentage points less than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€548,000
▲4% higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
59%
▼13 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%)
Social housing
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (20%)
Private rent
29%
▲20 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (9%)
Single-family dwellings
76%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (76%)
Built 2016 and later
44%
▲30 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (14%)
Average WOZ value
€548,000
▲4% higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (€526,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+45%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+43%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
59%
▼13 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (72%)
Social housing
11%
▼9 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (20%)
Private rent
29%
▲20 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (9%)
Single-family dwellings
76%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (76%)
Built 2016 and later
44%
▲30 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 45% between 2021 and 2025, to €548,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€548,000▲ 4% above Pijnacker-Nootdorp
+45% since 2021
Pijnacker-Nootdorp +43%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€303 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€303/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
123 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €548,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€135NL median
Water board levy€47–
Property tax (OZB)€36€48
Waste levy€34€27
Sewage levy€18€22
Costs to set aside€168
Maintenance reserve€157–
Buildings insurance€11–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Pijnacker-Nootdorp's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 69th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 123 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €548,000.
Levies: Pijnacker-Nootdorp's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Keijzershof Boszoom has the 8th-highest WOZ value of the 16 buurten in Pijnacker.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €548,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Keijzershof Boszoom
548,000
808
–
Pijnacker-Centrum/Dorp
461,000
1,908
–
Pijnacker Noord
381,000
1,904
–
Koningshof
466,000
1,009
–
Klapwijk
483,000
1,431
–
Tolhek
534,000
1,144
–
Keijzershof Erven
448,000
1,001
–
Ackerswoude
762,000
1,073
–
Keijzershof Eilanden
687,000
265
–
Tuindershof
504,000
442
–
Zuidpolder Oude Leede
735,000
351
–
Pijnacker Oost
852,000
282
–
Noordpolder Pijnacker
605,000
75
–
De Boezem
656,000
86
–
De Scheg
558,000
144
–
Tolhek Centrumlijn
404,000
222
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 59% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied59%
Social housing11%
Private rent29%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
76% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes76%
Multi-family homes24%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
56% of dwellings were built between 2006 and 2015, against 19% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
2006-201555.9%
2016 and later44.1%
Explanation
Based on 808 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
In 2025, 18 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Keijzershof Boszoom, 38% lower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 5%, against a rise of 2% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
18
▼38% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29)
Change since 2021
+5%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+2%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.8
▼62% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2.1)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
18
▼38% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (29)
Change since 2021
+5%
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+2%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
0.8
▼62% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2.1)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Keijzershof Boszoom registered 18 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 29 in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Keijzershof Boszoom18
The municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp29
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Keijzershof Boszoom is 'Theft and burglary': 7.2 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 12.9 in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Keijzershof BoszoomPijnacker-Nootdorp
Theft and burglary7.2
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 12.9▼ −44% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Vandalism and public order3.0
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 2.9≈ Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Fraud and scams2.1
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 3.9▼ −46% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Other and withheld2.1
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 1.5▲ +40% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Violence and threats1.7
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 2.8▼ −39% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Traffic1.7
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 5.1▼ −67% vs Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Environmental0.0
Pijnacker-Nootdorp 0.1≈ Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Keijzershof Boszoom registered 4 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average; green space is about the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
An estimated 81% of adults in Keijzershof Boszoom rate their own health as good, 3 percentage points more than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Fewer adults meet the physical activity guideline (42% against 48%) and fewer drink excessively (3% against 4%), but more report anxiety or depression (47% against 44%) and more feel lonely (45% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Keijzershof Boszoom, covering 80% of the area, against 24% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 12% of the area, in line with the 12% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (12%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼6 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (44%)
Lonely
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (43%)
Excessive drinking
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
80%
▲56 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (24%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼54 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (78%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
=about the same as Pijnacker-Nootdorp (12%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼6 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
47%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (44%)
Lonely
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (43%)
Excessive drinking
3%
▼1 percentage point lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Built-up, share of the area
80%
▲56 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (24%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼54 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (54%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Health
An estimated 81% of adults rate their own health as good, against 78% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
Good self-rated health
80.6%
78.2%
Smokes
13.3%
12.7%
Excessive drinking
3.4%
4.4%
Overweight
49.2%
48.9%
Lonely
45.1%
42.9%
Anxiety or depression feelings
46.7%
44.2%
Meets physical activity guideline
42.4%
47.9%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
12% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 12% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Traffic8%
Built-up80%
Recreation12%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 500 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
500 m
–
GP practice
600 m
–
Primary school
600 m
–
Daycare
600 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
1
GP practices
–
2
Daycares
–
2.6
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing slower than the Pijnacker-Nootdorp average.
Keijzershof Boszoom has 2,335 inhabitants (2026), or 9,266 per km² (5.8 times as high as in Pijnacker-Nootdorp). Between 2021 and 2026 the population rose 2%, against a rise of 6% in Pijnacker-Nootdorp. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 20% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+5%)
Aged 25 to 45
35%
▲12 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (23%)
Never married
57%
▲9 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Dutch origin
65%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (73%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
43%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (40%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
+2%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+5%)
Aged 25 to 45
35%
▲12 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (23%)
Never married
57%
▲9 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (48%)
Dutch origin
65%
▼8 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (73%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
43%
▲3 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (40%)
D66, share of the vote
20%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 2% between 2021 and 2026, to 2,335.
Residents, 2026
2,335
+2% since 2021
Pijnacker-Nootdorp +6%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 9,266 residents per km², this buurt is 5.8 times as densely populated as the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp.
Residents per km²9,266
Dwellings per km²3,232
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 10.6 children were born per 1,000 residents; 2.1 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
35% of residents are between 25 and 45.
0 to 15725
15 to 25205
25 to 45815
45 to 65435
65 to 80140
80 and over25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
57% of residents are never married.
Never married1,335
Married840
Divorced135
Widowed25
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
65% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,510
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)150
Outside Europe675
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
43% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1320
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4570
Higher professional, university660
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Pijnacker-Nootdorp voted. The largest party was D66 with 20% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Pijnacker-NootdorpThe Netherlands
D66
20.1%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.6%
16.7%
VVD
17.6%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
10.1%
12.8%
CDA
13.3%
11.8%
JA21
7.9%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
3.9%
4.5%
BBB
1.6%
2.6%
Other
9.9%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Keijzershof Boszoom has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 8% lower than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2). 28% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 2 percentage points more than in Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%).
Key figures
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
13%
▲5 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+15 pp
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+11 pp)
Social housing
11%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
29%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
24%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Transport, information and communication, share of businesses
13%
▲5 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (8%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
0%
▼4 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (4%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
11%
▼2 percentage points lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (13%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼8% lower than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (1.2)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲2 percentage points higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+15 pp
▲higher than Pijnacker-Nootdorp (+11 pp)
Social housing
11%
▼17 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Private rent
29%
▲15 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (14%)
Multi-family dwellings
24%
▼13 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 70 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie35
Handel en horeca25
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie30
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed10
Zakelijke dienstverlening70
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg50
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
28% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Pijnacker-Nootdorp (2025).
Petrol72%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)28%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 14% to 28% between 2021 and 2025.
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 910 passenger cars and 65 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars910
Motorcycles65
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
100% of addresses are residential.
Residential99.6%
Other0.4%
Explanation
Based on 811 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
9,266 residents per km²: 17 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²9,266
NL 539▲ +1619% vs NL
Social housing11%
NL 28%▼ −61% vs NL
Private rent29%
NL 14%▲ +107% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings24%
NL 37%▼ −35% vs NL
Average WOZ value€548,000
NL €398,000▲ +38% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026