We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Peel en Maas
Living in Panningen-Noord
The population is growing faster than in Peel en Maas. Homes cost less than the average in the municipality of Peel en Maas, and registered crime per resident is higher.
The average WOZ value in Panningen-Noord is €367,000, 4% lower than in Peel en Maas (€381,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 7%, the same as in Peel en Maas. 53% of the homes are owner-occupied, 20 percentage points less than in Peel en Maas (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€367,000
▼4% lower than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+7%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
53%
▼20 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
32%
▲13 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
15%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
59%
▼26 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Average WOZ value
€367,000
▼4% lower than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+7%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
53%
▼20 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
32%
▲13 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
15%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
59%
▼26 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
7%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1945–1964
19%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Built 2006–2015
12%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 7% between 2024 and 2025, to €367,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€367,000▼ 4% below Peel en Maas
+7% since 2024
Peel en Maas +7%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€305 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€305/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
142 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €367,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€111NL median
Water board levy€42–
Sewage levy€27€22
Property tax (OZB)€23€32
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€194
Maintenance reserve€181–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Peel en Maas's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 30th of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 142 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €367,000.
Levies: Peel en Maas's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Panningen-Noord has the 4th-lowest WOZ value of the 8 buurten in Panningen.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €367,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Panningen-Noord
367,000
923
–
Panningen-Zuid
300,000
1,216
–
De Riet Panningen
331,000
764
–
Buitengebied Vosberg-Loo
488,000
132
–
Ringoven
329,000
416
–
Buitengebied Zelen-Hub
510,000
92
–
Buitengebied Industrie Panningen
605,000
8
–
Buitengebied Everlo
478,000
172
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 53% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied53%
Social housing32%
Private rent15%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
59% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes59%
Multi-family homes41%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
28% of dwellings were built between 1992 and 2005, against 15% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Before 19456.6%
1945-196419.4%
1965-197416.5%
1975-19917%
1992-200528.4%
2006-201512.4%
2016 and later9.6%
Explanation
Based on 933 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
More registered crime per resident than the Peel en Maas average.
In 2025, 79 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Panningen-Noord, 3.0 times as high as in Peel en Maas (26). Since 2024 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 10%, against a rise of 3% in Peel en Maas. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
79
▲3.0 times as high as Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
+10%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.2
▼19% lower than Peel en Maas (2.7)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
79
▲3.0 times as high as Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
+10%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
2.2
▼19% lower than Peel en Maas (2.7)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Panningen-Noord registered 79 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Panningen-Noord79
The municipality of Peel en Maas26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Panningen-Noord is 'Theft and burglary': 32.5 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.4 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Panningen-NoordPeel en Maas
Theft and burglary32.5
Peel en Maas 9.4▲ +246% vs Peel en Maas
Traffic13.1
Peel en Maas 4.9▲ +167% vs Peel en Maas
Vandalism and public order12.1
Peel en Maas 3.1▲ +290% vs Peel en Maas
Violence and threats10.0
Peel en Maas 3.0▲ +233% vs Peel en Maas
Fraud and scams5.2
Peel en Maas 3.8▲ +37% vs Peel en Maas
Other and withheld4.7
Peel en Maas 1.4▲ +236% vs Peel en Maas
Environmental1.0
Peel en Maas 0.1▲ +900% vs Peel en Maas
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Panningen-Noord registered 2 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health below the Peel en Maas average; green space is below the Peel en Maas average.
An estimated 68% of adults in Panningen-Noord rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points less than in Peel en Maas. Fewer adults meet the physical activity guideline (42% against 47%) and fewer drink excessively (5% against 6%), but more feel lonely (47% against 43%) and more report anxiety or depression (45% against 43%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Panningen-Noord, covering 68% of the area, against 8% in Peel en Maas. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 10% of the area, 9 percentage points below the 19% in Peel en Maas.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (47%)
Lonely
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (43%)
Excessive drinking
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
68%
▲60 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Agriculture, share of the area
17%
▼52 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (69%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
68%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Meets physical activity guideline
42%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (47%)
Lonely
47%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (43%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
45%
▲2 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (43%)
Excessive drinking
5%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (6%)
Built-up, share of the area
68%
▲60 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Agriculture, share of the area
17%
▼52 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (69%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
0%
▼16 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Health
An estimated 68% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Peel en Maas
Good self-rated health
67.8%
73.4%
Smokes
14.5%
14.2%
Excessive drinking
4.9%
6.1%
Overweight
53.6%
53.4%
Lonely
47%
43%
Anxiety or depression feelings
45.2%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
42.4%
47.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
10% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 19% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Traffic3.8%
Built-up68%
Other built-up0.5%
Recreation10.2%
Agriculture17.5%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 300 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
300 m
–
GP practice
1,300 m
–
Primary school
1,100 m
–
Daycare
500 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
4
GP practices
–
0.2
Daycares
–
1.5
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Peel en Maas average.
Panningen-Noord has 1,915 inhabitants (2026), or 2,382 per km² (8.3 times as high as in Peel en Maas). Between 2024 and 2026 the population rose 6%, against a rise of 1% in Peel en Maas. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Peel en Maas was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+6%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Never married
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (46%)
Dutch origin
81%
▼3 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
+6%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Never married
42%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (46%)
Dutch origin
81%
▼3 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
49%
▲3 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 6% between 2024 and 2026, to 1,915.
Residents, 2026
1,915
+6% since 2024
Peel en Maas +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 2,382 residents per km², this buurt is 8.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Residents per km²2,382
Dwellings per km²1,153.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 5.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 7.9 died per 1,000.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
24% of residents are between 65 and 80.
0 to 15240
15 to 25175
25 to 45390
45 to 65435
65 to 80465
80 and over210
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
42% of residents are never married.
Never married795
Married795
Divorced155
Widowed165
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
81% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,555
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)130
Outside Europe230
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
49% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1350
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4640
Higher professional, university320
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Peel en Maas; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Peel en Maas voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
25.1%
16.7%
VVD
16.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.1%
12.8%
CDA
17.2%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
6.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Panningen-Noord has an average of 1.0 cars per household, 23% lower than in Peel en Maas (1.3). 21% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 1 percentage point more than in Peel en Maas (20%).
Key figures
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
38%
▲19 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+3 pp
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Retail, share of addresses
11%
▲9 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (86%)
Social housing
32%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
41%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€367,000
▼8% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
38%
▲19 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (19%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
2%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (10%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
9%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.0
▼23% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
21%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+3 pp
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Retail, share of addresses
11%
▲9 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (2%)
Industrial, share of addresses
0%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
82%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (86%)
Social housing
32%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (28%)
Multi-family dwellings
41%
▲4 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (37%)
Average WOZ value
€367,000
▼8% lower than the Netherlands (€398,000)
Business establishments by sector
Handel en horeca is the largest sector, with 105 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij5
Nijverheid en energie25
Handel en horeca105
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed15
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg30
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
21% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2025).
Petrol79.3%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)20.7%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 18% to 21% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
21%▲ 1 percentage point above Peel en Maas (20%)
+3 pp since 2024
Peel en Maas +2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 1,015 passenger cars and 70 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars1,015
Motorcycles70
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
82% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is retail (11%).
Residential81.7%
Retail10.9%
Office1.2%
Assembly1.3%
Healthcare0.3%
Industrial0.4%
Sports0.4%
Other6.2%
Explanation
Based on 1,142 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
2,382 residents per km²: 4.4 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²2,382
NL 539▲ +342% vs NL
Social housing32%
NL 28%▲ +14% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings41%
NL 37%▲ +11% vs NL
Average WOZ value€367,000
NL €398,000▼ −8% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings53%
NL 57%▼ −7% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026