We're pulling the figures from public sources. This usually takes a few seconds.
Area and its neighbourhoodsCBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods
Residents and householdsCBS
Homes and WOZ valueCBS · Kadaster BAG
Housing marketNVM market overview
Municipal leviesMunicipal budgets · CBS
SafetyCBS and Police
HealthRIVM Health Monitor
Land use and amenitiesCBS land use · proximity statistics
Road safety and electionsRijkswaterstaat · Kiesraad
Comparing with the municipality and the countryRankings and comparisons
Neighbourhood · Peel en Maas
Living in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek
The population is growing faster than in Peel en Maas. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Peel en Maas, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek is €509,000, 34% higher than in Peel en Maas (€381,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 5%, against a rise of 7% in Peel en Maas. 91% of the homes are owner-occupied, 18 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲34% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+5%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲18 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
9%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼14 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
Built 1945–1964
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Average WOZ value
€509,000
▲34% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+5%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲18 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
9%
▲1 percentage point higher than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲3 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
12%
▼14 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1992–2005
5%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
Built 1945–1964
24%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 5% between 2024 and 2025, to €509,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€509,000▲ 34% above Peel en Maas
+5% since 2024
Peel en Maas +7%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€445 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€445/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
235 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €509,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€124NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€32€45
Sewage levy€27€22
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€321
Maintenance reserve€300–
Buildings insurance€21–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Peel en Maas's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 23rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 235 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €509,000.
Levies: Peel en Maas's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 7 buurten in Baarlo.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €509,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek
509,000
86
–
Baarlo-centrum
341,000
1,125
–
Kuukven
447,000
312
–
Diepenbroek
351,000
1,057
–
Buitengebied Hummeren-Heuvel
484,000
74
–
Buitengebied Schafelt-Hei-Berckt
495,000
134
–
Buitengebied Raay-Kesselse Bergen
670,000
33
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 91% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied91%
Private rent9%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
31% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 10% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Before 194531.4%
1945-196424.4%
1965-197422.1%
1975-199111.6%
1992-20054.7%
2006-20151.2%
2016 and later4.7%
Explanation
Based on 86 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Peel en Maas average.
In 2025, 5 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek, 81% lower than in Peel en Maas (26). Since 2024 the registered rate per 1,000 residents fell 51%, against a rise of 3% in Peel en Maas. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
5
▼81% lower than Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
-51%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
5
▼81% lower than Peel en Maas (26)
Change since 2024
-51%
▼lower than Peel en Maas (+3%)
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek registered 5 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 26 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek5
The municipality of Peel en Maas26
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek is 'Theft and burglary': 4.8 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 9.4 in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-SoeterbeekPeel en Maas
Theft and burglary4.8
Peel en Maas 9.4▼ −49% vs Peel en Maas
Vandalism and public order0.0
Peel en Maas 3.1▼ −100% vs Peel en Maas
Violence and threats0.0
Peel en Maas 3.0▼ −100% vs Peel en Maas
Fraud and scams0.0
Peel en Maas 3.8▼ −100% vs Peel en Maas
Traffic0.0
Peel en Maas 4.9▼ −100% vs Peel en Maas
Environmental0.0
Peel en Maas 0.1≈ Peel en Maas
Other and withheld0.0
Peel en Maas 1.4▼ −100% vs Peel en Maas
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 1 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Peel en Maas average; green space is below the Peel en Maas average.
An estimated 78% of adults in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek rate their own health as good, 5 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (37% against 43%), fewer feel lonely (38% against 43%) and fewer are overweight (49% against 53%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (53% against 47%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek, covering 93% of the area, against 69% in Peel en Maas. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 3% of the area, 16 percentage points below the 19% in Peel en Maas.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼16 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (47%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Overweight
49%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
93%
▲24 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (69%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
78%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
3%
▼16 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (47%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Overweight
49%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
93%
▲24 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (69%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Health
An estimated 78% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Peel en Maas
Good self-rated health
78.1%
73.4%
Smokes
11.6%
14.2%
Excessive drinking
6.1%
6.1%
Overweight
49.2%
53.4%
Lonely
37.8%
43%
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
53%
47.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
3% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 19% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Traffic4.1%
Agriculture93.2%
Forest and nature2.7%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A large supermarket lies here at an average road distance of 1700 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,700 m
–
GP practice
2,000 m
–
Primary school
2,100 m
–
Daycare
2,300 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.1
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing faster than the Peel en Maas average.
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek has 220 inhabitants (2026), or 103 per km² (64% lower than in Peel en Maas). Between 2024 and 2026 the population rose 7%, against a rise of 1% in Peel en Maas. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Peel en Maas was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+7%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (27%)
Married
49%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (42%)
Dutch origin
93%
▲9 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
60%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
+7%
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
27%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (27%)
Married
49%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (42%)
Dutch origin
93%
▲9 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Secondary education (havo, vwo, mbo 2–4)
60%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (46%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population grew 7% between 2024 and 2026, to 220.
Residents, 2026
220
+7% since 2024
Peel en Maas +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 103 residents per km², this buurt is 64% less densely populated than the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Residents per km²103
Dwellings per km²40.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, almost no children were born; almost no one died.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
27% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1530
15 to 2520
25 to 4550
45 to 6560
65 to 8045
80 and over15
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
49% of residents are married.
Never married95
Married105
Divorced10
Widowed5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
93% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands205
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)10
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
60% of residents have a havo, vwo or mbo2-4 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo140
Havo, vwo, mbo2-460
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Peel en Maas; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Peel en Maas voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
25.1%
16.7%
VVD
16.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.1%
12.8%
CDA
17.2%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
6.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Buitengebied Pratwinkel-Soeterbeek has an average of 1.5 cars per household, 15% higher than in Peel en Maas (1.3). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 9 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲30 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Business services, share of businesses
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲8 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+4 pp
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
11%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (5%)
Multi-family dwellings
12%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
40%
▲30 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Business services, share of businesses
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
10%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.5
▲15% higher than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
28%
▲8 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+4 pp
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
11%
▲6 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residential, share of addresses
86%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (86%)
Lodging, share of addresses
5%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (5%)
Multi-family dwellings
12%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
91%
▲34 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Private rent
9%
▼5 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 20 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij20
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie5
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
28% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2025).
Petrol72%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)28%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 24% to 28% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
28%▲ 8 percentage points above Peel en Maas (20%)
+4 pp since 2024
Peel en Maas +2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 120 passenger cars and 20 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars120
Motorcycles20
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
86% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (11%).
Residential86%
Industrial11%
Lodging5%
Other2%
Explanation
Based on 100 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
103 residents per km²: 81% less densely populated than the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²103
NL 539▼ −81% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings12%
NL 37%▼ −68% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings91%
NL 57%▲ +60% vs NL
Private rent9%
NL 14%▼ −36% vs NL
Single-family dwellings88%
NL 63%▲ +40% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026