The average WOZ value in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder is €507,000, 33% higher than in Peel en Maas (€381,000). Between 2024 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 7%, the same as in Peel en Maas. 92% of the homes are owner-occupied, 19 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas (73%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€507,000
▲33% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+7%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲19 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼18 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1945–1964
31%
▲17 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
Average WOZ value
€507,000
▲33% higher than Peel en Maas (€381,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2024
+7%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+7%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲19 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Social housing
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
Private rent
7%
▼1 percentage point lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Single-family dwellings
97%
▲12 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (85%)
Built 1975–1991
8%
▼18 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (26%)
Built 1945–1964
31%
▲17 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (14%)
Built 1992–2005
6%
▼9 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (15%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 7% between 2024 and 2025, to €507,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€507,000▲ 33% above Peel en Maas
+7% since 2024
Peel en Maas +7%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€425 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€425/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
221 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €507,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€124NL median
Water board levy€46–
Property tax (OZB)€32€45
Sewage levy€27€22
Waste levy€19€27
Costs to set aside€301
Maintenance reserve€281–
Buildings insurance€20–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Peel en Maas's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 23rd of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 221 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €507,000.
Levies: Peel en Maas's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder has the 3rd-highest WOZ value of the 8 buurten in Meijel.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €507,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder
507,000
71
–
Meijel-centrum
347,000
1,228
–
Buitengebied Platveld-Krum-Witdonk
508,000
93
–
Hof-Startebos
478,000
548
–
Donk
341,000
561
–
Buitengebied Molenbaan-Vieruitersten
510,000
65
–
Buitengebied Nederweerterdijk-Berg
489,000
59
–
Buitengebied Steenoven
491,000
93
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 92% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied92%
Private rent7%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
97% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes97%
Multi-family homes3%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
35% of dwellings were built before 1945, against 10% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Before 194535.2%
1945-196431%
1965-197415.5%
1975-19918.5%
1992-20055.6%
2016 and later4.2%
Explanation
Based on 71 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Too few residents for a rate per resident: these are counts.
Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder has too few residents for a reliable rate per 1,000 residents (under 200), so counts are shown instead of a comparison. In 2025, 5 crimes were registered, against 14 in 2021. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 14 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crimes, 2025
5
▼down from 14 in 2021
Home burglary
0
2023–2025
Registered crime per year
5 crimes were registered in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder in 2025 (14 in 2021).
Registered crimes, 2025
5
down from 14 in 2021
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200) — registered crime, not all crime — CBS/Politie 47018NED.
The largest category in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder is 'Theft and burglary': 1 in 2025.
Theft and burglary1
Violence and threats1
Fraud and scams1
Traffic1
Other and withheld1
Vandalism and public order0
Environmental0
Explanation
Too few residents for a reliable per-1,000 figure (threshold 200). Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2024, police in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder registered 6 traffic accidents, of which 2 with injury and none fatal.
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2024
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Peel en Maas average; green space is below the Peel en Maas average.
An estimated 80% of adults in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas. Fewer adults report anxiety or depression (37% against 43%), fewer feel lonely (38% against 43%), fewer smoke (12% against 14%) and fewer are overweight (51% against 53%). Agricultural land is the largest land use in Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder, covering 83% of the area, against 69% in Peel en Maas. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 12% of the area, 7 percentage points below the 19% in Peel en Maas.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (14%)
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
11%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
80%
▲7 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (73%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
12%
▼7 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (19%)
More figures
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Lonely
38%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (43%)
Smokes
12%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (14%)
Overweight
51%
▼2 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (53%)
Agriculture, share of the area
83%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (69%)
Built-up, share of the area
0%
▼8 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (8%)
Forest and nature, share of the area
11%
▼5 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (16%)
Health
An estimated 80% of adults rate their own health as good, against 73% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Peel en Maas
Good self-rated health
79.6%
73.4%
Smokes
11.5%
14.2%
Excessive drinking
5.8%
6.1%
Overweight
50.8%
53.4%
Lonely
38.2%
43%
Anxiety or depression feelings
37%
42.9%
Meets physical activity guideline
49.1%
47.3%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
12% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 19% in the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Traffic2.7%
Recreation1.6%
Agriculture82.9%
Forest and nature10.8%
Water2%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 1200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,700 m
–
GP practice
1,600 m
–
Primary school
1,600 m
–
Daycare
1,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0.4
GP practices
–
0.6
Daycares
–
0.4
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is growing about as fast as the Peel en Maas average.
Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder has 170 inhabitants (2026), or 54 per km² (81% lower than in Peel en Maas). In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Peel en Maas was 81%, 3 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) had the highest share there: 25% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2024
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
31%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (27%)
Married
47%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (42%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
55%
▲29 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2024
+0%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Turnout, municipality of Peel en Maas
81%
▲3 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+1%
=about the same as Peel en Maas (+1%)
Aged 45 to 65
31%
▲4 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (27%)
Married
47%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (42%)
Dutch origin
94%
▲10 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (84%)
Higher education (hbo, wo)
55%
▲29 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (26%)
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid), share of the vote
25%
▲8 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population held steady between 2024 and 2026, at 170.
Residents, 2026
170
+0% since 2024
Peel en Maas +1%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 54 residents per km², this buurt is 81% less densely populated than the municipality of Peel en Maas.
Residents per km²54
Dwellings per km²22.4
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 29.4 children were born per 1,000 residents; almost no one died.
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
31% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 1515
15 to 2515
25 to 4540
45 to 6555
65 to 8040
80 and over10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
47% of residents are married.
Never married70
Married80
Divorced10
Widowed10
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
94% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands160
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)5
Outside Europe5
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
55% of residents have a higher professional (hbo) or university (wo) education.
Havo, vwo, mbo2-450
Higher professional, university60
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Peel en Maas; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 81% of eligible voters in Peel en Maas voted. The largest party was PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid) with 25% of the valid votes.
Municipality of Peel en MaasThe Netherlands
D66
12.3%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
25.1%
16.7%
VVD
16.3%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
6.1%
12.8%
CDA
17.2%
11.8%
JA21
8.4%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
4.1%
4.5%
BBB
4.2%
2.6%
Other
6.2%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Buitengebied Katsberg-Polder has an average of 1.1 cars per household, 15% lower than in Peel en Maas (1.3). 31% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 11 percentage points more than in Peel en Maas (20%).
Key figures
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲23 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲11 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+3 pp
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
19%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Assembly, share of addresses
6%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residents per km²
54
▼90% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲35 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Agriculture, forestry and fishing, share of businesses
33%
▲23 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (10%)
Culture, recreation and other services, share of businesses
0%
▼10 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (10%)
Financial services and real estate, share of businesses
0%
▼6 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (6%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.1
▼15% lower than Peel en Maas (1.3)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
31%
▲11 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (20%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2024
+3 pp
▲higher than Peel en Maas (+2 pp)
Industrial, share of addresses
19%
▲14 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (5%)
Assembly, share of addresses
6%
▲5 percentage points higher than Peel en Maas (1%)
Lodging, share of addresses
1%
▼4 percentage points lower than Peel en Maas (5%)
Residents per km²
54
▼90% lower than the Netherlands (539)
Private rent
7%
▼7 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (14%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
92%
▲35 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij is the largest sector, with 10 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij10
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca5
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie0
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed0
Zakelijke dienstverlening5
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg5
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten0
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
31% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 20% in the municipality of Peel en Maas (2025).
Petrol68.8%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)31.2%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 28% to 31% between 2024 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
31%▲ 11 percentage points above Peel en Maas (20%)
+3 pp since 2024
Peel en Maas +2 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 80 passenger cars and 15 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars80
Motorcycles15
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
84% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is industrial (19%).
Residential83.5%
Retail2.4%
Office1.2%
Assembly5.9%
Industrial18.8%
Lodging1.2%
Sports1.2%
Other2.4%
Explanation
Based on 85 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3% multi-family dwellings, against 37% nationally.
This areaThe Netherlands
Multi-family dwellings3%
NL 37%▼ −92% vs NL
Residents per km²54
NL 539▼ −90% vs NL
Private rent7%
NL 14%▼ −50% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings92%
NL 57%▲ +61% vs NL
Single-family dwellings97%
NL 63%▲ +54% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025