The population is shrinking, while it grows in Meppel. Homes cost more than the average in the municipality of Meppel, and registered crime per resident is lower.
The average WOZ value in Vlinderbuurt is €382,000, 23% higher than in Meppel (€310,000). Between 2021 and 2025 the average WOZ value rose 30%, against a rise of 37% in Meppel. 80% of the homes are owner-occupied, 22 percentage points more than in Meppel (58%).
Key figures
Average WOZ value
€382,000
▲23% higher than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+30%
▼lower than Meppel (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲22 percentage points higher than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
10%
▼21 percentage points lower than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
10%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲15 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1975–1991
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
Average WOZ value
€382,000
▲23% higher than Meppel (€310,000)
Rise in WOZ value since 2021
+30%
▼lower than Meppel (+37%)
More figures
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲22 percentage points higher than Meppel (58%)
Social housing
10%
▼21 percentage points lower than Meppel (31%)
Private rent
10%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (11%)
Single-family dwellings
88%
▲15 percentage points higher than Meppel (73%)
Built 1975–1991
0%
▼19 percentage points lower than Meppel (19%)
Built before 1945
3%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (16%)
Built 1945–1964
1%
▼11 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
WOZ value per year
The average WOZ value rose 30% between 2021 and 2025, to €382,000.
Average WOZ value, 2025
€382,000▲ 23% above Meppel
+30% since 2021
Meppel +37%
Explanation
The WOZ value as struck on 1 January of the year before the KWB edition.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Modelled ownership costs
Modelled ownership costs for a typical dwelling here: ~€313 per month (excluding mortgage and energy)
€313/ month
Typical home here, before mortgage and energy
144 m² · measured buurt average
WOZ €382,000 · average here
Levies you'll be billed€116NL median
Water board levy€42–
Property tax (OZB)€37€34
Waste levy€20€27
Sewage levy€17€22
Costs to set aside€197
Maintenance reserve€184–
Buildings insurance€13–
Model estimates, not bills.
For this home, Meppel's OZB, sewage and waste levies rank 61st of 334 gemeenten, cheapest first.
cheapestdearest
Water board, maintenance and insurance are estimated from national rates and the home's value and size, so they aren't compared.
Explanation
The home: one typical home of 144 m² (measured average in this buurt) with the average WOZ value here, €382,000.
Levies: Meppel's own OZB, sewage and waste rates for 2026. The water board levy uses national average rates.
Set aside: maintenance at 0.85% and buildings insurance at 0.06% a year of the rebuild cost (€1,800 per m²).
NL median: what the same home would pay in the middle gemeente. Gemeenten where a regional body collects the waste levy are left out.
Not included: mortgage and energy. These are estimates, not actual bills.
Source: Municipal levies + CBS 2026
Dwelling value ladder
Vlinderbuurt has the 2nd-highest WOZ value of the 4 buurten in Oosterboer.
Average WOZ value from the Netherlands down to this area, and its rank within its own group (e.g. buurten within the same wijk). Provincie is omitted: KWB publishes no province rows to average.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
WOZ value and age structure
Here: €382,000 average WOZ value.
Value
Dwellings
Aged 65+
Vlinderbuurt
382,000
641
–
Veldenbuurt
335,000
931
–
Vogelbuurt
405,000
383
–
Verzetsbuurt
272,000
1,265
–
Explanation
Each circle is an area: position by average WOZ value, size by dwelling count. The 65-and-over share (pct_65_plus) travels on every point but is not yet drawn as a second axis.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB)
Dwellings by ownership
The largest category is owner-occupied, at 80% of dwellings.
Owner-occupied80%
Social housing10%
Private rent10%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by type
88% of the dwelling stock is single-family homes.
Single-family homes88%
Multi-family homes12%
Explanation
CBS publishes this as a share of the dwelling stock, not a count.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Dwellings by build period
94% of dwellings were built between 1992 and 2005, against 16% in the municipality of Meppel.
Before 19452.6%
1945-19640.6%
1975-19910.2%
1992-200593.9%
2006-20152.7%
Explanation
Based on 621 dwellings with a registered construction year in the BAG (verblijfsobjecten whose pand has no usable bouwjaar, such as 1005 or 9999, are excluded).
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
02 · Safety
Less registered crime per resident than the Meppel average.
In 2025, 19 crimes per 1,000 residents were registered in Vlinderbuurt, 41% lower than in Meppel (32). Since 2021 the registered rate per 1,000 residents rose 94%, against a rise of 11% in Meppel. Crimes are counted where they happen, not where the offender lives.
Key figures
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
19
▼41% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
+94%
▲higher than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.2
▲75% higher than Meppel (2.4)
Crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
19
▼41% lower than Meppel (32)
Change since 2021
+94%
▲higher than Meppel (+11%)
Home burglary per 1,000 dwellings
4.2
▲75% higher than Meppel (2.4)
Registered crimes per 1,000 residents, 2025
In 2025, Vlinderbuurt registered 19 crimes per 1,000 residents, against 32 in the municipality of Meppel.
Vlinderbuurt19
The municipality of Meppel32
Explanation
Crime is counted where it happens and divided by the number of residents, so places with many visitors — city centres, nightlife, stations — score higher.
The largest category in Vlinderbuurt is 'Fraud and scams': 7.6 per 1,000 residents in 2025, against 4.5 in the municipality of Meppel.
VlinderbuurtMeppel
Fraud and scams7.6
Meppel 4.5▲ +69% vs Meppel
Traffic5.1
Meppel 5.8▼ −12% vs Meppel
Theft and burglary3.8
Meppel 11.9▼ −68% vs Meppel
Violence and threats1.3
Meppel 4.5▼ −71% vs Meppel
Vandalism and public order0.6
Meppel 4.1▼ −85% vs Meppel
Other and withheld0.6
Meppel 1.5▼ −60% vs Meppel
Environmental0.0
Meppel 0.1≈ Meppel
Explanation
Four categories are structurally withheld at buurt level (sex offences, child pornography, child prostitution, other integrity offences); the gap with the published total is shown under 'other'.
In 2021, police in Vlinderbuurt registered 1 traffic accidents, of which 0 with injury and none fatal.
2021
FatalInjuryMaterial damage only
Explanation
Registered accidents (BRON, Rijkswaterstaat); material-damage-only accidents have not been systematically registered since roughly 2010 and are not comparable between areas. This area shows only accidents with an exactly known location (roughly 80-85% of all registered accidents); the rest is known only at street, intersection or gemeente level. The comparison with the gemeente therefore also uses only the gemeente's exactly-located accidents, which is why that figure is lower than on the gemeente's own page.
Source: BRON — Bestand geRegistreerde Ongevallen Nederland (Rijkswaterstaat) 2021
03 · Living environment
Residents rate their health above the Meppel average; green space is above the Meppel average.
An estimated 81% of adults in Vlinderbuurt rate their own health as good, 7 percentage points more than in Meppel. Fewer adults feel lonely (38% against 46%), fewer report anxiety or depression (36% against 44%) and fewer smoke (12% against 17%), but more meet the physical activity guideline (51% against 49%). Built-up land is the largest land use in Vlinderbuurt, covering 89% of the area, against 17% in Meppel. Green space such as parks, sports fields, forest and nature covers 9% of the area, 3 percentage points above the 6% in Meppel.
Key figures
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲7 percentage points higher than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (44%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲2 percentage points higher than Meppel (49%)
Built-up, share of the area
89%
▲72 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼69 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Recreation, share of the area
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Self-rated health (estimated)
81%
▲7 percentage points higher than Meppel (74%)
Green (parks, sport, nature)
9%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (6%)
More figures
Lonely
38%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (46%)
Anxiety or depression feelings
36%
▼8 percentage points lower than Meppel (44%)
Smokes
12%
▼5 percentage points lower than Meppel (17%)
Meets physical activity guideline
51%
▲2 percentage points higher than Meppel (49%)
Built-up, share of the area
89%
▲72 percentage points higher than Meppel (17%)
Agriculture, share of the area
0%
▼69 percentage points lower than Meppel (69%)
Recreation, share of the area
9%
▲6 percentage points higher than Meppel (3%)
Health
An estimated 81% of adults rate their own health as good, against 74% in the municipality of Meppel (2024).
This areaThe municipality of Meppel
Good self-rated health
80.6%
74%
Smokes
11.7%
17%
Excessive drinking
5.5%
6%
Overweight
53.7%
53.4%
Lonely
38.4%
45.6%
Anxiety or depression feelings
36.5%
43.5%
Meets physical activity guideline
51.1%
48.8%
Explanation
An RIVM model estimate (small-area estimation from the 2024 Health Monitor for Adults and Elderly), not a direct tabulation — even a buurt that was not itself surveyed gets an estimate. Figures cover adults aged 18 and over.
Source: RIVM/CBS Gezondheidsmonitor Volwassenen en Ouderen (kleine-gebieden-schatting) 2024
Land use
9% of the area is green (parks, sport, nature), against 6% in the municipality of Meppel.
Traffic2.3%
Built-up88.6%
Recreation9.1%
Explanation
Every share is calculated as a percentage of the TOTAL area (land and water together, peiljaar 2022); water is therefore one of the slices itself, not a separate whole. Green is the sum of recreational terrain (parks, sport fields, allotments, day recreation) and natural terrain (forest, open natural terrain) — agricultural land is not counted as green here.
Source: CBS Bodemgebruik (86211NED) 2022
Distance to amenities
A daycare lies here at an average road distance of 1200 m.
Distance
Value
Large supermarket
1,500 m
–
GP practice
1,700 m
–
Primary school
1,900 m
–
Daycare
1,200 m
–
Large supermarkets
–
0
GP practices
–
0
Daycares
–
0.2
Explanation
Average road distance from every address in this buurt to the nearest amenity, and the average count within 1 km — a buurt average, not a distance from one address.
Source: CBS proximity statistics 2025
04 · Residents
The population is shrinking, while it grows in Meppel.
Vlinderbuurt has 1,555 inhabitants (2026), or 3,516 per km² (5.3 times as high as in Meppel). Between 2021 and 2026 the population fell 4%, against a rise of 6% in Meppel. In the 2025 House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer) election, turnout in the municipality of Meppel was 83%, 5 percentage points above the national 78%. Of the parties that are largest nationally, D66 had the highest share there: 17% of the vote, against 17% nationally. Election results exist only per municipality, so these are the municipality's figures.
Key figures
Population growth since 2021
-4%
▼lower than Meppel (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Meppel (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Never married
46%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (83%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
36%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (28%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population growth since 2021
-4%
▼lower than Meppel (+6%)
Turnout, municipality of Meppel
83%
▲5 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (78%)
More figures
Growth of the dwelling stock
+0%
▼lower than Meppel (+4%)
Aged 45 to 65
34%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Never married
46%
▼2 percentage points lower than Meppel (48%)
Dutch origin
88%
▲5 percentage points higher than Meppel (83%)
Lower education (primary, vmbo, mbo 1)
36%
▲8 percentage points higher than Meppel (28%)
D66, share of the vote
17%
=about the same as the Netherlands (17%)
Population per year
The population shrank 4% between 2021 and 2026, to 1,555.
Residents, 2026
1,555
-4% since 2021
Meppel +6%
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Density
With 3,516 residents per km², this buurt is 5.3 times as densely populated as the municipality of Meppel.
Residents per km²3,516
Dwellings per km²1,456.8
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Births and deaths per 1,000 residents
In 2025, 3.2 children were born per 1,000 residents; 3.2 died per 1,000.
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
BirthsDeaths
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Residents by age group
34% of residents are between 45 and 65.
0 to 15250
15 to 25180
25 to 45335
45 to 65525
65 to 80245
80 and over30
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Marital status
46% of residents are never married.
Never married715
Married685
Divorced115
Widowed35
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Residents by country of origin
88% of residents have Dutch origin.
Netherlands1,375
Europe (excluding the Netherlands)55
Outside Europe125
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026
Education level of residents aged 15 to 75
36% of residents have a primary, vmbo or mbo1 level education.
Primary, vmbo, mbo1450
Havo, vwo, mbo2-4390
Higher professional, university410
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2024
Parliamentary election
These figures are for the whole municipality of Meppel; there is no result per buurt or wijk. At the general election (Tweede Kamer) of 29 October 2025, 83% of eligible voters in Meppel voted. The largest party was D66 with 17% of the valid votes.
Municipality of MeppelThe Netherlands
D66
16.8%
16.9%
PVV (Partij voor de Vrijheid)
15.2%
16.7%
VVD
14.9%
14.2%
GROENLINKS / Partij van de Arbeid (PvdA)
11.8%
12.8%
CDA
13.1%
11.8%
JA21
6.1%
5.9%
Forum voor Democratie
5.8%
4.5%
BBB
3.7%
2.6%
Other
12.6%
14.4%
Explanation
Official election result (Kiesraad), top 8 parties by national vote count plus 'Other'; share of valid votes. A voter may vote at any polling station in their own gemeente; there is therefore no reliable buurt- or wijk-level result. This figure is the whole gemeente's own result.
Source: Kiesraad — Verkiezingsuitslag Tweede Kamer (data.overheid.nl) TK2025
05 · More figures
More figures
Vlinderbuurt has an average of 1.4 cars per household, 27% higher than in Meppel (1.1). 29% of cars run on something other than petrol (diesel, LPG or electricity, hybrids included), 3 percentage points more than in Meppel (26%).
Key figures
Business services, share of businesses
38%
▲14 percentage points higher than Meppel (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
▲higher than Meppel (+1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
98%
▲10 percentage points higher than Meppel (88%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (3%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
12%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
10%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business services, share of businesses
38%
▲14 percentage points higher than Meppel (24%)
Trade and hospitality, share of businesses
7%
▼13 percentage points lower than Meppel (20%)
Industry and energy, share of businesses
3%
▼9 percentage points lower than Meppel (12%)
Cars per household (2025)
1.4
▲27% higher than Meppel (1.1)
Cars not on petrol (2025)
29%
▲3 percentage points higher than Meppel (26%)
Change in cars not on petrol since 2021
+4 pp
▲higher than Meppel (+1 pp)
Residential, share of addresses
98%
▲10 percentage points higher than Meppel (88%)
Healthcare, share of addresses
4%
▲1 percentage point higher than Meppel (3%)
Office, share of addresses
0%
▼1 percentage point lower than Meppel (1%)
Multi-family dwellings
12%
▼25 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (37%)
Social housing
10%
▼18 percentage points lower than the Netherlands (28%)
Owner-occupied dwellings
80%
▲23 percentage points higher than the Netherlands (57%)
Business establishments by sector
Zakelijke dienstverlening is the largest sector, with 55 establishments.
Landbouw, bosbouw en visserij0
Nijverheid en energie5
Handel en horeca10
Vervoer, informatie en communicatie10
Financiële diensten, onroerend goed5
Zakelijke dienstverlening55
Overheid, onderwijs en zorg40
Cultuur, recreatie, overige diensten20
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Passenger cars by fuel type
29% of passenger cars do not run on petrol (diesel, LPG, electric etc.), against 26% in the municipality of Meppel (2025).
Petrol71%
Other fuel (diesel, LPG, electric etc.)29%
Explanation
CBS splits passenger cars into 'petrol' and 'other fuel' only. That second category bundles diesel, LPG, electric (including hybrid), hydrogen, alcohol, LNG and CNG together — CBS publishes no separate electric-car count per buurt, wijk or gemeente, so this is not the same as an 'electric share'.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Share on other fuel per year
The share of passenger cars not running on petrol went from 25% to 29% between 2021 and 2025.
Share on other fuel, 2025
29%▲ 3 percentage points above Meppel (26%)
+4 pp since 2021
Meppel +1 pp
Explanation
See the 'Passenger cars by fuel type' card for what 'other fuel' covers — this is not the share of electric cars.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Vehicles by kind
In 2025, 810 passenger cars and 70 motorcycles were registered here.
Passenger cars810
Motorcycles70
Explanation
At this level CBS publishes only passenger cars and motorcycles, no vans or trucks.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2025
Addresses by building use
98% of addresses are residential; the largest other use is healthcare (4%).
Residential97.6%
Office0.5%
Assembly0.3%
Healthcare4.1%
Sports0.2%
Other0.9%
Explanation
Based on 636 verblijfsobjecten in use. An object with several registered uses (e.g. a flat above a shop) is counted under each of them, so the shares can add up to more than 100%.
Source: Kadaster BAG (bag-light.gpkg) 2026-09-01
Biggest difference from the Netherlands
3,516 residents per km²: 6.5 times as densely populated as the Dutch average.
This areaThe Netherlands
Residents per km²3,516
NL 539▲ +552% vs NL
Multi-family dwellings12%
NL 37%▼ −68% vs NL
Social housing10%
NL 28%▼ −64% vs NL
Owner-occupied dwellings80%
NL 57%▲ +40% vs NL
Private rent10%
NL 14%▼ −29% vs NL
Explanation
The 5 characteristics that differ most from the national average, ranked by log ratio (so a halving and a doubling count as equally different); the shown percentage is the ordinary difference against the Netherlands.
Source: CBS Kerncijfers wijken en buurten (KWB) 2026